Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access
Total views : 215

Forest Resource Use Pattern in Relation to Socioeconomic Status (A Case Study from Two Altitudinal Zones of Western Himalaya, India)


  • Department of Botany and Microbiology, HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar Garhwal Uttarakhand, India


Biomass has been the principal component of domestic energy throughout the Indian Himalayan region. The present study, carried out in two altitudinal zones, explored the forest resource use pattern in relation to the socio economic status of the denizens in a part of Western Himalaya, India. Structured and pretested questionnaires were used to interview approximately 30% of the total households in each village (a total of 143 in 9 villages). The average cultivated land per family was less than 1 ha (0.85). In sub tropical and temperate zones, the average fuelwood and fodder consumption (kg/day/household) was found to be 14.93 and 63.80 and 13.16 and 60.42 respectively. Statistical analysis showed significant variation of fuelwood and fodder consumption in the two altitudinal zones (P < 0.000, t-test; n= 143 and df= 142). Alternative fuels (kerosene and LPG) are used occasionally. More than 70% of biomass is extracted from the forests and a total of 30 tree species are frequently lopped for this purpose. The pressure exerted by human and bovine populations, coupled with unsustainable management policies has resulted in the destruction of forest cover and ecological degradation. Support and active participation of local people is mandatory for conservation of these forests.


Biomass, Socioeconomic Profile, Dependency, Altitude, Western Himalaya.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 2)


  • Anitha V., Muraleetharan P.K. and Binilkumar A.S. (2003). Natural resource depletion in protected areas: Socio economic linkages. Indian J. Social Development, 3: 44–59.
  • Bhargava A., Khanna R.N., Bhargava S.K. and Kumar S. (2004). Exposure risk to carcinogenic PAHs in indoor-air during biomass combustion whilst cooking in rural India. Atmospheric Environment, 38(28): 4761-4767.
  • Bhatt B.P., Negi A.K., Todaria N.P. (1994). Fuelwood consumption pattern at different altitudes in Garhwal Himalaya. Energy, 19 (4): 465–468.
  • Bhatt J.A., Hussain A., Malik Z.A. and Todaria N.P. (2016). Fuelwood consumption of dhabas (temporary hotels) along an altitudinal gradient in a pilgrim and tourist affected protected area of western Himalaya. J. Sustainable Forestry, 35(2):133-148.
  • Chettri N. and Sharma E. (2006). Assessment of natural resources uses patterns: a case study along a trekking corridor of Sikkim Himalaya, India. Resource Energy and Development, 3 (1): 21–34.
  • Chettri N., Sharma E., Deb D.C. and Sundriyal R.C. (2002). Effect of firewood extraction on tree structure, regeneration, and woody biomass productivity in a trekking corridor of the Sikkim Himalaya. Mountain Research and Development, 22 (2): 150–158.
  • Dhyani S. and Maikhuri R.K. (2012). Fodder banks can reduce women drudgery and anthropogenic pressure from forests of Western Himalaya. Current Science, 103 (7): 763.
  • Díaz E., Smith-Sivertsen T., Pope D., Lie R.T., Diaz A. and McCracken J. (2007). Eye discomfort, headache and back pain among Mayan Guatemalan women taking part in a randomised stove intervention trial. J. Epidemiology and Community Health, 61(1): 74-79.
  • FAO (2007). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, A review of the current state of bioenergy development in G8 +5 countries (
  • FAO (2008). (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), Bosques y energý´a: cuestiones claves. Roma Italia: Organizacio´n de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentacio´ n; p. 69 FAO: Montes 154.
  • FSI (2000). The State of Forest Report 1999. Dehradun, India: FSI, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.
  • Glatzel G. (1999). Historic forest use and its possible implication to recently accelerated tree growth in Central Europe. In: Causes and Consequences of Accelerated Tree Growth in Europe (T. Karjalainen, H. Spieker andO. Laroussine, Eds.), EFI (European Forest Institute), Joensuu, Finland, pp. 65–74.
  • Gupta R.K., Pathania M.S. and Gupta T. (1997). A study on fuel consumption pattern in Himachal Pradesh: a case study. Range Management and Agroforestry, 18 (2): 181–188.
  • Hastorf C.A., Whitehead W.T. and Johannessen S. (2005). Late prehistoric wood use in an Andean intermontane valley. Economic Botany, 59(4): 337-355.
  • Husen A. (2013). Growth characteristics, biomass and chlorophyll fluorescence variation of Garhwal Himalaya's fodder and fuelwood tree species at the nursery stage. Open J. Forestry, 3(1): 12–16.
  • Jain R.K. (1992). Fuelwood characteristics of certain hardwood and softwood tree species of India. Bioresource Technology, 41(2):129–133.
  • Jain R.K. (1993). Fuelwood characteristics of some tropical trees of India. Biomass Bioenergy, 4(6): 461–464.
  • Jain R.K. (1998). Fuelwood characteristics of some trees of India. Indian J. Forestry, 14:155–159.
  • Jain R.K. and Singh B. (1999). Fuelwood characteristics of selected indigenous tree species from central India. Bioresource Technology, 68:305–308.
  • Kataki R. and Konwer D. (2002). Fuelwood characteristics of indigenous tree species of north-east India. Biomass Bioenergy, 22(6):433-437.
  • Khanduri V.P., Sharma C.M., Ghildiyal S.K. and Puspwan K.S. (2002). Forest composition in relation to socio-economic status of people at three high altitudinal villages of a part of Garhwal Himalayas. Indian Forester, 128(12): 1335–1345.
  • Krishna S. and Ramaswamy S. (1932). Calorific Values of Some Indian Woods. Indian Forest Bulletin (N.S.) No 79. Chemistry. Calcutta, India: Central Publication Branch, Government of India.
  • Kumar J.I.N., Patel K., Kumar R.N. and Bhoi R.K. (2011). An evaluation of fuelwood properties of some Aravally mountain tree and shrub species of Western India. Biomass Bioenergy, 35: 411-414.
  • Kumar P. (2005). Natural resource policy: some related issues. In: Uttaranchal Vision and Action Programme (M.L. Dewan and J. Bahadur, Eds.), Concept publishing company; New Delhi.
  • Kumar R. and Shahabuddin G. (2005). Effects of biomass extraction on vegetation structure, diversity and composition of forest in Sariska Tiger Reserve India. Environmental Conservation, 32: 248–259.
  • Malik Z.A. (2014). Phytosociological behavoiur, anthropogenic disturbances and regeneration status along an altitudinal gradient in Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary (KWLS) and its adjoining areas. Ph. D. Thesis HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar Uttarakhand: 225 pp.
  • Malik Z.A., Bhat J.A. and Bhatt A.B. (2014a). Forest resource use pattern in Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary and its fringe areas (A case study from Western Himalaya, India). Energy Policy, 67: 138-145.
  • Malik Z.A., Hussain A., Iqbal K. and Bhatt A.B. (2014b). Species richness and diversity along the disturbance gradient in Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary and its adjoining areas in Garhwal Himalaya, India. Inter. J. Current Research, 6(12): 10918-10926.
  • Mishra V.K., Retherford R.D. and Smith K.R. (1999). Biomass cooking fuels and prevalence of tuberculosis in India. Inter. J. Infectious Diseases, 3(3): 119-129.
  • Mishra V., Dai X., Smith K.R. and Kika L. (2004). Maternal exposure to biomass smoke and reduced birth weight in Zimbabwe. Annals of Epidemiology, 14(10): 740-747.
  • Murali K.S., Shanker U., Shaanker U.R., Ganeshaiah K.N. and Bawa K.S. (1996). Impact of NTFPs extraction on regeneration, population structure and species composition. Economic Botany, 50: 252–269.
  • Pattanayak S., Sills E.O., Mehta A.D. and Kramer R.A. (2003). Local uses of parks: uncovering patterns of household production from forests of Siberut Indonesia. Conservation and Society, 1 (2): 209–222.
  • Rao K.S., Semwal R.L., Maikhuri R.K., Nautiyal S., Sen, K.K., Singh K., Chandrasekhar K. and Saxena K.G. (2003). Indigenous ecological knowledge, biodiversity and sustainable development in the central Himalayas. Tropical Ecology, 44(1): 93-111.
  • Ravindranath N.H. and Hall D.O. (1995). Biomass, Energy and Environment: a developing country perspective from India, Oxford University Press. 257 pp.
  • Regalado J., Perez-Padilla R., Sansores R.H., Paramo, Ramirez J.I., Brauer M. and Pare P. (2006). The effect of biomass burning on respiratory symptoms and lung function in rural Mexican women. American J. Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 174: 901-905.
  • Ruger N., Gutierrez A.G., Kissling W.D., Armesto J.J. and Huth A. (2007). Ecological impacts of different harvesting scenarios for temperate evergreen rain forest in southern Chile – a simulation experiment. Forest Ecology and Management, 252: 52-66.
  • Sharma A., Prasad R., Saksena S. and Joshi V. (1999). Micro level sustainable biomass system development in central Himalaya: Stress computation and biomass planning. Sustainable Development, 7(3):132–139.
  • Sharma C.M., Gairola S., Ghildiyal S.K. and Suyal S. (2009). Forest resource use patterns in relation to socioeconomic status. Mountain Research and Development, 29 (4):308–319.
  • Silori C.S., Mishra B.K. (2001). Assessment of livestock grazing pressure in and around the elephant corridors in Mudumalai wildlife sanctuary. Biodiversity and Conservation, 10: 2181–2195.
  • Singh G., Rawat G.S. and Veerma D. (2010). Comparative study of fuelwood consumption by villagers and seasonal Dhaba owners in the tourist affected regions of Garhwal Himalaya India. Energy Policy, 38 (4): 1895–1899.
  • Singh J.S. and Singh S.P. (1992). Forests of Himalaya. Structure, Functioning and Impact of Man. Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital, India, 176pp.
  • Tewari J.C., Tripathi D., Pratap N. and Singh S.P. (2003). A study of the structure, energy fluxes and emerging trends in traditional Central Himalayan agroforestry systems. Forests Trees and Livelihoods, 13: 17–38.
  • World Health Organization (2008). The global burden of disease:2004 update. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
  • Zhang J.J. and Smith K.R. (2007). Household air pollution from coal and biomass fuels in China: measurements, health impacts, and interventions. Environmental Health Perspectives, 115: 848-855.


  • There are currently no refbacks.