Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access
Total views : 324

Diversity, Population Structure and Regeneration Potential of Tree Species in a Community Conserved Sacred Forest from Western Odisha, India

Affiliations

  • Sambalpur University, Jyoti Vihar, Burla, Odisha, India

Abstract


Analysis of tree diversity, dominance, population structure and regeneration potential of tree species in a community conserved sacred forest from Western Odisha, India has been reported in this present paper. A total of 58 tree species of 50 genera and 31 families were recorded from the site. Shorea robusta emerged as the dominant tree species followed by sub dominant species like Cleistanthus collinus and Anogeissus latifolia. The tree stem density was found to be relatively higher than the nearby natural forest due to better management strategy and restriction of tree felling and overexploitation. This sacred forest site supports a rich biodiversity and act as a refuge for several RET (Rare, Endangered and Threatened) species. A reverse J shaped population curve with lagers stem density in lower girth class observed for the site showed a good regeneration potential with a stable nature of the forest stand. Besides this the sacred forest conserved through religious faith and beliefs posses a high cultural significance in the area. Hence the community based people participatory conservation measures should be encouraged for further effective conservational measures.

Keywords

Sacred Forest, Biodiversity, RET Species, Population Curve, People Participatory Conservation.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 1)

References


  • Butchart S.H.M., Walpole M. and Collen B. (2010). Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science, 328: 1164-1168.
  • Champion H.G. and Seth S.K. (1968). A Revised Survey of Forest Types of India. Manager of Publications, Govt of India, Delhi.
  • Chandrakanth M.G., Bhat M.G. and Accavva M.S. (2004). Socio- economic changes and sacred groves in South India: protecting a community based resource management institution. Natural resources Forum, 28: 102-111.
  • Devi U. and Behera N. (2003). Assessment of plant diversity in response to forest degradation in a tropical dry deciduous forest of Orissa. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 15: 147-163.
  • Gadgil M. and Vartak V.D. (1975). The Sacred groves of India: A plea for continued conservation. J. Bombay Natural History Society, 72: 314-320
  • Gao H., Ouyang Z., Chen S. and Van Koppen C.S.A. (2013). Role of culturally protected forests in biodiversity conservation in Southeast China. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22: 531-544.
  • Jamir S.A. and Pandey H.N. (2003). Vascular plant diversity in the sacred groves of Jaintia Hills in northeast India. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12: 1497-1510.
  • Janzen D.H. (1986). In Biodiversity (ed Wilson, E.O.) National Academy Press, Washington. Pp 130-137.
  • Jha C.S. and Singh J.S. (1990). Composition and dynamics of dry tropical forest in relation to soil texture. J. Vegetation Science, 1: 609-614.
  • Khan M.L., Khumbongmayum A.S and Tripathi R.S. (2008). The sacred groves and their significance in conserving biodiversity: an overview. Inter. J. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 34(3): 277-291
  • Khan M.L., Menon S. and Bawa K.S. (1997). Effectiveness of the protected area network in biodiversity conservation, a case study of Meghalaya state. Biodiversity and Conservation, 6: 853-868
  • Knight D.H. (1975). A Phytosociological analysis of species rich tropical forest on Barro-Colorado Island: Panama. Ecological Monograph, 45: 259-289.
  • Kothari A., Singh N. and Suri S. (1996). People and Protected Areas: Towards Partitipatory conservation in India. Sage Publication, New Delhi. 272pp.
  • Kushwaha S.P.S. and Nandy S. (2012). Species diversity and community structure in sal (Shorea robusta) forests of two different rainfall regimes in West Bengal, India. Biodiversity Conservation, 21: 1215-1228
  • Lalfakwma, Sahoo U.K., Roy S., Vanlalhritpuia K. and Vanlalhluna P.C. (2009). Community composition and tree population structure in undisturbed and disturbed tropical semi-evergreen forest stands of North-East India. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res., 7:303-318.
  • Malhotra K.C., Gokhale Y., Chatterjee S. and Srivastava S. (2007). Sacred groves in India an overview. IGRMS, Bhopal and Aryan Books International, New delhi.
  • Mishra B.P., Tripathi O.P. and Laloo R.C. (2005). Community characteristics of a climax subtropical humid forest of Meghalaya and population structure of ten important tree species. Tropical Ecology. 46: 241–251.
  • Mishra B.P., Tripathi R.S., Tripathy O.P. and Pandey H.N. (2003). Effect of disturbance on the regeneration of four dominant and economically important woody species in a broad- leaved subtropical humid forest of Meghalaya, northeast India. Current Science, 84:1449- 1453.
  • Mishra B.P., Tripathy O.P., Tripathi R.S. and Pandey H.N. (2004). Effect of anthropogenic disturbance on plant diversity and community structure of a sacred grove in Meghalaya, northeast India. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13: 421-436.
  • Misra R. (1968). Ecology Work Book. Oxford and IBH Publication, New Delhi, 244 pp
  • Murali K.S., Uma S., Shaanker U., Ganeshiah K.N. and Baswa K.S. (1996). 1. Extraction of forest products in the forests of Baligirrangan hills, India. 2: Impact of NTFP extraction on regeneration, population structure and species composition. Econ. Bot., 50: 252-269
  • Murphy P.G. and Lugo A.E. (1986). Ecology of Tropical Dry Forest. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17: 67-88.
  • Panda P.C., Mahapatra A.K., Acharya P.K. and Debata A.K. (2013), Plant diversity in tropical deciduous forests of Eastern Ghats, India: A landscape level assessment, Inter. J. Biodiversity and Conservation, 5(10): 625–639.
  • Pielou E.C. (1966). The measurements of diversity in different types of biological collections. J. Theor. Biol., 13:131-144.
  • Pimm S.L., Russell G.J., Gittleman J.L. and Brooks T.M. (1995). The future of biodiversity. Science, 269 (5222): 347-350.
  • Ramakrishnan P.S., Saxena K.G. and Chandrashekara U.M. (1998). Conserving the Sacred for Biodiversity Management. Oxford and IBH Publication Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India.
  • Rands M.R.W., Adams W.M., Bennun L., Butchart S.H.M., Clements A., Coomes D., Entwistle A., Hodge I., Kapos V., Scharlemann J.P.W., Sutherland W.J. and Vira B. (2010). Biodiversity Conservation: Challenges Beyond 2010. Science, 1298-1303pp.
  • Rawat G.S. (2008). Special Habitats and Threatened Plants of India. ENVIS Bulletin: Wildlife and Protected Areas, Vol. 11(1). Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, India. pp. 239.
  • Reddy C.S., Babar S., Amarnath G. and Pattanaik C. (2011). Structure and floristic composition of tree stand in tropical forest in the Eastern Ghats of northern Andhra Pradesh, India. J. For. Res., 22(4): 491-500.
  • Sahu S.C., Dhal N.K., Lal B. and Mohanty R.C. (2012). Differences in tree species diversity, distribution and population structure in a tropical dry deciduous forest of Malayagiri hill range, Eastern Ghats, India. J. Mount. Science, 9:492-500.
  • Saxena H.O. and Brahmam M. (1994-96). Flora of Orissa Vol. I-IV. Orissa Forest Development Corporation, Bhubaneswar.
  • Shannon C.E. and Wiener W. (1963). The mathematical Theory of Communication. University Illinois Press, Urbana, p.127
  • Simpson E.H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163:688
  • Singh J.S., Singh S.P., Saxena A.K. and Rawat Y.S. (1984). The forest vegetation of silent valley, India. Tropical Rain Forest (Chadwick, A.C. and S.L.
  • Sutton, eds). The Leeds Symposium. Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society, Leeds, England. Pp. 25-52.
  • Sundarapandian S.M. and Swamy P.S. (1997). Plant biodiversity at low- elevation evergreen and moist deciduous forests at Kodayar (W.Ghats, India). Inter. J. Ecology and Envir. Science, 23: 363- 379
  • Uma Shankar. (2001). A case of high tree diversity in a sal (Shorea robusta)- dominated lowland forest of Eastern Himalaya: Floristic composition, regeneration and conservation. Current Science, 81(7): 776- 786.
  • UNEP (1995). Global Biodiversity Assessment.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Visalakshi N. (1995). Vegetation analysis of two tropical dry evergreen forest in southern India. Tropical Ecology, 36: 117-127.
  • Whitmore T.C. (1975). Tropical rain forest of the far east. 282pp, Claren- don, Oxford.
  • Wild R. and McLeod C. (2008). Sacred Natural sites. Guidelines for Protected Area Managers, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.