Calotropis procera: A Browsing Record of alternate Food Choice by Blackbucks in Western Haryana, India

Vikram Delu; Dharambir Singh; Sumit Dookia; Priya; Vinod Karwasra

doi:10.36808/if/2022/v148i10/165672

Calotropis procera: A Browsing Record of alternate Food Choice by Blackbucks in Western Haryana, India

Authors

Vikram Delu Department of Zoology and Aquaculture, CCS Haryana Agricultural University Hisar -125004
Dharambir Singh Department of Zoology and Aquaculture, CCS Haryana Agricultural University Hisar -125004
Sumit Dookia Department of Zoology and Aquaculture, CCS Haryana Agricultural University Hisar -125004
Priya Department of Zoology and Aquaculture, CCS Haryana Agricultural University Hisar -125004
Vinod Karwasra Department of Zoology and Aquaculture, CCS Haryana Agricultural University Hisar -125004

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2022/v148i10/165672

Keywords:

Browsing, Semi arid, Blackbuck, Calotropis procera, Haryana

Abstract

During the present investigation, the first browsing record on the leaves of Calotropis procera by blackbucks have been reported from the two populations (Badopal and Mangali Surtia) of semi arid ecosystem in Western Haryana, India. The fortnightly visits were conducted to record the diurnal data of food preferences using Scan sampling from September 2019 to August 2020 at Badopal and consequently record was confirmed from Mangali Surtia. Out of a total of 53 floral species documented from the Badopal site, blackbucks consumed 26 plant species belonging to 25 families with varied degree of preferences according to availability and selectivity. Present study showed that the blackbucks are selective feeder and in scarcity of food they can be shifted from grazing to browsing habit and observed to consume Calotropis procera, as an alternate food choice during lean period of time, which is generally not eaten by herbivores due to its chemical mechanism. C. procera has enormous properties for its medicinal uses, therefore, based upon our observation in wild, it is suggested that leaves of Calotropis can be supplemented with other feed in captive ruminates like blackbucks and other ungulates in India to complete their therapeutic need.

References

Abbas B., Tayeb A.E. and Sulleiman Y.R. (1992). Calotropis procera: feed potential for arid zones. Vet. Rec., 131 (6): 132.

Altmann J. (1974). Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behavior 49: 227â€“265. https://doi. org/10.1163/156853974X00534

Amit K.K., Bhamare S.R. and Bhamare H.P.(2012).Calotropisprocera: An Ethnopharmacological Update. ARPB, 2 (II):142-150.

Asif M. and Modse S. (2015). Crop Damage by the Blackbuck Antilope cervicapra in and around Chitta Reserve Forest of Bidar, Karnataka. International Journal of Life Science and Scientific Research, 2(4): 500-505.

Campolucci P., Paolini C. (1990). Desertification control in the Sahel regions - low-cost large-scale afforestation techniques. Note Tecniche 10. Centro di Sperimentazione Agricola e Forestale di Sperimentazione per la Pioppicoltura.24 p.

Chauhan, N.P.S. and Singh R. (1990).Crop Damage by over abundant Populations of Nilgai and Blackbuck in Haryana (India) and its Management. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Vertebrate Pest Conference 1990, pp. 218â€“220.

Costa R.G., Medeiros A.N., de ;Alves A.R. and Medeiros G. R. de (2009). Prospects for use of rooster tree (Calotropis procera) in animal production.Revista Caatinga, 22 (1): 1-9.

Dookia S. (2002). Habitat preference, abundance and group size of the Indian gazelle Gazella bennetti in semi arid region of Rajasthan, India. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis submitted to J.N.V. University, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India. 179 pp.

Ecocrop, (2011).Ecocrop database.FAO.

Ecoport, (2011).Ecoport database.Ecoport.

Fleming T.H., Breitwisch R. and Whitesides G.H. (1987).Patterns of tropical vertebrate frugivore diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 91â€“109.

Gallacher D.J. and Hill J.P. (2006). Effects of camel vs oryx and gazelle grazing on the plant ecology of the Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve. In: Mohamed, A.M.O., Reclaiming the Desert: Towards a Sustainable Environment in Arid Lands. Proc. 3rd Joint UAE-Japan Symposium on Sustainable GCC Environment and Water Resources (EWR2006), Abu Dhabi: 85-95.

HeuzÃ© V., Tran G., Baumont R., Bastianelli D. (2016).Calotropis (Calotropis procera).Feedipedia, a programme by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. http://www.feedipedia.org/node/588 Last updated on April 6, 2016, 12:38.

IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group (2017). Antilope cervicapra. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017:e.T1681A50181949. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.20172.RLTS.T1681A50181949.en. Downloaded on 10 September 2020

Jhala Y.V. and Isvaran K. (1997). Seasonal Effects on the Nutritional Ecology of Blackbuck Antelope cervicapra. : Journal of Applied Ecology, 34(6): 1348-1358.

Jhala Y.V. and Isvaran K. (2016). Behavioural Ecology of a Grassland Antelope, the Blackbuck Antilope cervicapra: Linking Habitat, Ecology and Behaviour. In: Ecology of Large Herbivores in South and Southeast Asia. Springer, 151-176.

Long J.L. (2003).Introduced mammals of the world: their history, distribution and influence, CSIRO Publishing, Victoria, Australia, pp. 486â€“7.

Mallon D.P. (2008). Antilope cervicapra. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: e.T1681A6448761. Downloaded on 09.11.2016.https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS. T1681A6448761.en

Mirza, Z.B. and Waiz, A. (1973). Food availability for blackbuck (Antelope cervicapra) at Lal Suhanra Sanctuary, Pakistan, Biological conservation 5(2).

Nehra O.P., Oswal M.C. and Faroda A.S. (1987). Management of fodder trees in Haryana. Indian Farming, 37 (3): 31-33.

Orwa C., Mutua, A., Kindt R., Jamnadass R. and Anthony S. (2009). Agroforestry Database: a tree reference and selection guide version 4.0. World Agroforestry Centre, Kenya.

Parsons W. T. and Cuthbertson E.G.(2001). Noxious weeds of Australia. CSIRO Publishing,pp 712.

Rodgers W.A., Panwar H.S. and Mathur V.B. (2000). Wildlife Protected Area Network in India: A review. Wildlife Institute of India.

Schaik V.C.P., Terborgh J.W. and Wright S.J. (1993). The phenology of tropical forests: adaptive significance and consequences for primary consumers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 353â€“377.

Terborgh J. (1983). Five New World Primates: A Study in Comparative Ecology. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Retrieved August 7, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7ztr6n.

Tezara W., Colombo, R., Coronel I. and MarÃn O. (2011).Water relations and photosynthetic capacity of two species of Calotropis in a tropical semi-arid ecosystem.Ann. Bot., 107 (3): 397-405.