Crop Depredation by Monkey Outside Protected Area in Nepal; Costs, Conditions and Perceptions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2018/v144i10/139570Keywords:
Human-Wildlife Conflict, Crop Depredation, Compensation, ConservationAbstract
Human wildlife conflict outside the protected area is increasing in Nepal however; government and their conservation partners are mainly focused in biodiversity issues within protected areas only. This study was conducted in Jaidi village of Baglung district to analyze the status of crop damage and people's perception on such damage caused by monkey. Data were collected through series of community consultation, field observation and household survey at 10% sampling intensity. The annual crop damage in volume and cost was 183.46 kg/HH and NRs 7659.77/HH respectively. Amount of damage was significantly different with different varieties of crops (p=0.000). Multiple linear regressions showed that amount of crop was significantly dependent on the distance of farm from the forest area (ß= -0.052, p= 0.000), available water source (ß= -0.059, p= 0.000), respondents house (ß= 0.021, p= 0.000), and nearby settlement (ß= 0.038, p= 0.000). More than half of the respondents were unwilling to conserve monkey due to damage caused to their crops. The willingness to monkey conservation and the extent of damage are found to be dependent. This study recommends to formulate the human monkey management plan outside the protected area.References
Air A. (2015). Crop raiding and conflict: Study of Rhesus macaque-human conflict in Shivapuri-Nagarjun National Park, Kathmandu Nepal, M.Sc. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology: 34 pp.
Acharya K.P. (2004). Does community forests management supports biodiversity conservation? Evidences from two community forests from the mid-hills of Nepal. J. Forest and Livelihood, 4: 44-54.
Acharya K.P., Paudel P.K., Neupane P.R. and Köhl M. (2016). Human-wildlife conflict in Nepal: patterns of human fatalities and injuries caused by large mammals. PLoS ONE, 11(9): 1-18.
Aryal K. and Chalise M.K. (2013). Human-monkey interface in Arkhale and Nayagaun, Gulmi, West Nepal. Nepal J. Zoology, 1(1): 30-40.
Awasthi B. and Singh N.B. (2015). Status of human-wildlife conflict and assessment of crop damage by wild animals in Gaurishankar Conservation Area, Nepal. J. Institute of Science and Technology, 20(1): 107-111.
Bahuguna V.K. (1986). Survey of public opinion for wildlife-A case study. Indian Forester, 112(10): 874-880.
Bayani A., Tiwade D., Dongre A., Dongre A.P., Phatak R. and Watve M. (2016). Assessment of crop damage by protected wild mammalian herbivores on the Western Boundary of TadobaAndhari Tiger Reserve (TATR), Central India. PLoS ONE, 11(4): 1-18.
Berkmuller K. (1986). Attitude barriers to eco-development and people's participation. Indian Forester, 112(10): 949-953.
Boulton A.M., Horrocks J.A. and Baulu J. (1996). The Barbados vervet monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus): Changes in population size and crop damage 1980–1994. Inter. J. Primatology, 17: 831–844.
CBS (2014). Nepal in figures. Central Bureau of Statistics, Nepal. Retrieved from http://cbs.gov.np/image/data/ Publication/Nepal% 20in%20Figures%20English%202014.pdf on 28.11.2016.
Chauhan A. and Pirta R.S. (2010). Public opinion regarding human-monkey conflict in Shimla, Himachal Pradesh. J. Human Ecology, 30(2): 105-109.
DFRS (2015). State of Nepal's forests. Forest Resource Assessment (FRA) Nepal, Department of Forest Research and Survey (DFRS). Kathmandu, Nepal.
Dickman A. (2010). Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Animal conservation, 13:458-466.
Dickman A.J., Macdonald E.A. and Macdonald D.W. (2011). A review of financial instruments to pay for predator conservation and encourage human–carnivore coexistence. Proceeding of National Academy of Science of the United States, 108(34):13937–13944.
Distefano E. (2005). Human-Wildlife Conflict worldwide: collection of case studies, analysis of management strategies and good practices. Accessed at https://www.tnrf.org/files/E-INFO-HumanWildlife_Conflict_worldwide_case_studies_by_Elisa_Distefano_n o_date.pdf on 30 November, 2016.
DNPWC (2017). Wildlife Damage Relief Guideline, 2013 (Second Amendment, 2017). Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Dowie M. (2011). Conservation refugees: the hundred-year conflict between global conservation and native peoples. MIT press, 341pp.
Forthman-Quick D. L. (1986). Activity budgets and the consumption of human foods in twotroops of baboons (Papio anubis) at Gilgil, Kenya. In: Primate Ecology and Conservation (J.G. Else and P.C. Lee Eds.), Cambridge University Press, 221228 pp.
Ghimirey Y. (2012). Status and Threat Assessment of Assamese Macaque: A study on Human-Macaque conflict in Makalu-Barun National Park, Nepal. Technical Report submitted to Primate Conservation Incorporated, USA.
Hill C.M. (1997). Crop-raiding by wild vertebrates: The farmer's perspective in an agricultural community in western Uganda. Inter. J. Pest Management, 43(1):77-84.
Hill C.M. (1998). Conflicting attitudes towards elephants around the Budongo Forest Reserce, Uganda. Environmental Conservation, 26: 218-228.
Hill C.M. (2000). Conflict of interest between people and baboons : Crop raiding in Uganda. Inter. J. Primatology, 21(2):299-314.
Naughton-Treves L. (1998). Predicting patterns of crop damage by wildlife around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Conservation Biology, 12(1): 156-168.
Naughton-Treves L., Treves A., Chapman C. and Wrangham R. (1998). Temporal patterns of crop-raiding by primates: linking food availability in croplands and adjacent forest. J. Applied Ecology, 35(4): 596-606.
Nyhus P.J., Osofsky S.A., Ferraro P., Madden F. and Fischer H. (2005). Bearing the costs of human–wildlife conflict: the challenges of compensation schemes. In: People and Wildlife, Conflict or Coexistence? (R. Woodroffe, S. Thirgood and A.
Rabinowitz, A. Eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 107–121 pp.
Pandit R. and Bevilacqua E. (2011). Forest users and environmental impacts of community forestry in the hills of Nepal. Forest Policy and Economics, 13(5): 345-352.
Pandey S. and Bajracharya S.B. (2015). Crop protection and its effectiveness against wildlife: A case study of two villages of Shivapuri National Park, Nepal. Nepal J. Science and Technology, 16(1): 1-10.
Paudel G. (2014). Analysis of equity, poverty and sustainability aspects of community forests of Nepal. VIKAS (A Journal of Development), 36(1): 89-96.
Paudel G. (2015). Forest resource income variation in mid-hills of Nepal: a case study from two CFUGs of Parbat district, Nepal. Inter. J. of Environment, 4(3): 1-10.
Pirta R.S., Gadgil M. and Kharshikar A.V. (1997). Management of the rhesus monkey Macaca mulatta and hanuman langur Presbytis entellus in Himachal Pradesh, India. Biological Conservation, 79: 97–106.
Pokharel G.K. and Shah K.B. (2008). Role of Community Forests in Faunal Diversity Conservation: A Case Study of Community Forests within Satbariya Range Post of Dang District. Nepal J. Science and Technology, 9: 111-117.
Priston N.E.C. (2005). Crop-raiding by Macaca ochreata brunnescens in Sulawesi: reality, perceptions and outcomes for conservation. PhD thesis University of Cambridge.
Regmi G.R., Nekaris K.A., Kandel K. and Nijman V. (2013). Cropraiding macaques: predictions, patterns and perceptions from Langtang National Park, Nepal. Endangered Species Research, 20: 217-226.
Sahoo S.K. and Mohnot S.M. (2004). A survey of crop damage by Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and Hanuman langur (Semnopithecus entellus) in Himachal Pradesh, India. Tiger Paper, 31(4): 1-7.
Shrestha U.B., Shrestha B.B. and Shrestha S. (2010). Biodiversity conservation in community forests of Nepal: Rhetoric or reality. Inter. J. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2(5): 98-104.
Woodroffe R., Thirgood S. and Rabinowitz A. (2005). The future of coexistence: resolving human-wildlife conflicts in a changing world. In: People and Wildlife, Conflict or Coexistence? (R. Woodroffe, S. Thirgood and A. Rabinowitz, A. Eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 390-398 pp.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Unless otherwise stated, copyright or similar rights in all materials presented on the site, including graphical images, are owned by Indian Forester.