Integrating Conservation and Development in Southern Western Ghats of Kerala, India: Achievements, Challenges and Opportunities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2019/v145i10/149210Keywords:
Ecodevelopment, Livelihood Assets, Conservation Development, Human Capital, Social Capital.Abstract
Ecodevelopment, a co-management model, is a site-specific approach, which seeks active community participation and ownership for the twin objectives of conservation and development in and around Protected Areas (PAs). The last three decades of implementation of this approach in different PAs of India have given mixed results. This study, carried out in three important PAs of Southern Western Ghats in Kerala, tries to evaluate the programme, present a people's perspective on the issue of conservation and development and highlights the emerging challenges for effectively carrying forward these initiatives. Study employs a mixed approach to qualitative and quantitative assessment through surveys, focused group discussions and in-depth interviews with different Ecodevelopment Committees. The study reveals that while the programme has been largely successful in achieving its objectives, there are variations primarily in terms of secondary benefits, which could be attributed to the varying extent of handholding and strength of institutional frameworks in the three sites. Moreover, there are newer challenges that are emerging which call for a dynamic and flexible outlook towards continuation of these initiatives.References
Badola R., Bhardwaj A.K. and Rathore B.M.S. (1998). Sharing Benefits of Conservation: Emerging Scenarios in People-PA Relationship in India. In Proc. of the National Seminar on Biodiversity Conservation-Challenges and Opportunities, October 9-10, 1998. Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education.
Bhardwaj A.K. (2007). An Assessment of Ecodevelopment Initiatives in Oeriyar Tiger Reserve, Kerala, India. Ph.D. Thesis Submitted to Forest Research Institute University, Dehradun.
Brockington D. (2002). Fortress conservation: the preservation of the Mkomazi Game Reserve, Tanzania. Indiana University Press.
Cernea M.M. (1987). Farmer organizations and institution building for sustainable development.
Chapin M. (2004). A challenge to conservationists. World Watch November.
DfID U.K. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. London: DFID, 445.
Dreze J. and Sen A. (1999). India: Economic development and social opportunity. OUP Catalogue.
Fennel D.A. (2003). Ecotourism: An Introduction. London and New York.
Forest and Wildlife Department, Government of Kerala (1992). Annual Report for Periyar Tiger Reserve. Report submitted to Government of India.
Forest and Wildlife Department, Government of Kerala (2000). Status Paper of Periyar Tiger Reserve. A Report prepared by Wildlife Preservation Division, Thekkady.
Gadgil M. and Guha R. (1992). This fissured land: An ecological history of India.Oxford Univ. Press. Delhi.
Gupta S. and Mishra B.K. (1999). Quantification of anthropogenic pressures in Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve. In: Ecological and Socio-economic studies on the Kalakkad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve-An Ecodevelopment Approach. Final Report on Conservation of Biodiversity under Forestry Research, Education and Extension Project,426 pp. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun (December 1999).
Gurukkal R. (2003). The eco-development project and the socioeconomics of the fringe area of the Periyar Tiger Reserve: a concurrent study. Report, School of Social Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, India.
Kerala Forest andWildlife Department (2012). Tiger Conservation Plan for Parambikulam Tiger Reserve, Kerala, India.
Kerala Forest and Wildlife Department (2012). Management Plan for Eravikulam National Park, Kerala, India.
Melkani V.K. (2001). Involving Local People in Biodiversity Conservation in Kalakadu- Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve- an overview. Current Science, 80(3) 437-441.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well Being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington DC.
Panwar H.S. (1992). Ecodevelopment-An Integrated Approach to Sustainable Development for People and Protected Areas. Paper presented at IV World Congress on National Parks and Protected Areas, 10-12, February, 2002, Caracas, Venezuela.
Peluso N.L. (1992). Rich forests, poor people: Resource control and resistance in Java. Univ. of California Press.
Peluso N.L. (1993). Coercing conservation?: The politics of state resource control. Global environmental change, 3(2): 199-217.
School of Social Sciences (2002). Quantification of Socioeconomic impact of the India Eco Development Project at Periyar Tiger Reserve, Kerala. Report Submitted to CCF (WL), Thiruvananthapuram. Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam.
Singh S. (1998). Ecodevelopment in India: Some Concepts and Issues. Paper presented at National Workshop on Ecodocumentation, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun, November 24-26, 1998.
Spence M. (1996). Dispossessing the wilderness: Yosemite Indians and the National Park ideal, 1864-1930. Pacific historical review, 65(1): 27-59.
Vaccaro I., Beltran O. and Paquet P.A. (2013). Political ecology and conservation policies: some theoretical genealogies. J. Political Ecology, 20(20): 255-272.
Vinodan A., and Manalel J. (2011). Local economic benefits of ecotourism: A case study on Parambikulan Tiger Reserve, Kerala, India. South Asian J. Tourism and Heritage, 4(2): 93-109.
Wildlife Institute of India Database (2019). Protected Area Database of India.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Unless otherwise stated, copyright or similar rights in all materials presented on the site, including graphical images, are owned by Indian Forester.