Stability of Stem form Quotient in Clones of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh across Southern India

Stability of Stem form Quotient in Clones of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh across Southern India

Authors

  •   Smitha G. Nair   College of Forestry, OUAT, Bhubaneswar, Orissa
  •   Sivakumar Veerasamy   Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu
  •   A. Vijayaraghavan   Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu
  •   G. Suresh   Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu
  •   A. Anees   Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu
  •   A. Vinothkumar   Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu
  •   T. Yuvaraj   Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2021/v147i2/155972

Keywords:

Eucalyptus, Form Quotient, Stability Analysis, GEI, Single Tree Volume, Stem Taper.

Abstract

Stem taper, often quantified as form quotient or form factor, is an index of the narrowing of tree trunk with respect to its height. It is a heritable character influenced by environment. Single tree volume calculations without taking the Form factor into account may not give accurate values. Use of a general form factor instead of specific form factor for each clone, even in the case of clear boles like Eucalyptus camaldulensis may result in an overestimation or underestimation of volume. This is significant as E. camaldulensis is a pulp wood species and form quotient near to one indicates lesser taper and higher pulpwood recovery. This study explores the variation in form quotient across locations for E. camaldulensis clones and the genotype X environment interaction (GEI) effects on form quotient across four sites viz., Marakkanam, Ariyalur, Tirupati and Karaikal.

References

Adesoye P.O., and Popoola O.D. (2016). Determinants of stem form: Application to Tectona grandis (Linn. F) stands. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 35(5): 338-354.

Ajay C., Bera S.K., Singh, A.L., Kumar N., Gangadhar K. and Kona P. (2020). Evaluation of Genotype x Environment Interaction and Yield Stability Analysis in Peanut Under Phosphorus Stress Condition Using Stability Parameters of AMMI Model. Agric. Res., 9: 477-486. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-020-00458-3>

Anandan A., Sabesan T., Ramasamy E., Rajiv G., Muthalagan N., and Suresh R. (2009). Appraisal of Environmental Interaction on Quality Traits of Rice by Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction Analysis. Cereal Research Communications - CEREAL RES COMMUN, 37: 131-140.

Babić V., Babić M., Ivanović M., Marija K.B. and Dimitrijevic M. (2010). Understanding and utilization of genotype-byenvironment interaction in maize breeding. Genetika, 42(1):79-90.

Bachireddy V., Payne R., Chin K. and Kang M. (1992). Conventional Selection versus Methods that Use Genotype × Environment Interaction in Sweet Corn Trials. Hort Science, 27(5):432-436.

Baltunis B.S. and Brawner J. T. (2010). Clonal stability in Pinus radiata across New Zealand and Australia. I. Growth and form traits. New Forests, 40(3): 305-322.

Benbrahim M. and Gavaland A. (2003). A new stem taper function for short-rotation poplar. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 18(4): 377-383.

Bibi T., Hafiz Saad Bin Mustafa, Tariq Mahmood A.H. and Qurban Ali (2018). Multivariate analysis for adaptability and yield stability of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) Strains in different agro-climatic zones. Genetika, 50(2): 369-378.

Bose L.K., Jambhulkar N.N., Pande K. and Singh O.N. (2014). Use of AMMI and other stability statistics in the simultaneous selection of rice genotypes for yield and stability under direct-seeded conditions. 74(March): 3-9.

Callister A.N., Ades P.K., Arndt S.K. and Adams M.A. (2007). Clonal variation in shoot respiration and tree growth of Eucalyptus hybrids. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 37(8): 1404-1413.

Claughton-Wallin H. and McVicker F. (1920). The Johnson 'Absolute Form Quotient' as an Expression of Taper. Journal of Forestry, 18(4): 346-357.

Doede D.L., and Adams, W.T. (1997). The genetics of stem volume, stem form, and branch characteristics in sapling noble fir. Silvae Genetica, 47(4): 177-183.

Elias A.A., Robbins K.R., Doerge R.W. and Tuinstra M.R. (2016). Half a Century of Studying Genotype X Environment Interactions in Plant Breeding Experiments. Crop Science, 56 (Sept): 2090-2105

Farshadfar E. (2008). Incorporation of AMMI stability value and grain yield in a single non-parametric index (GSI) in bread wheat. Pakistan J of Biological Sciences, 11(14): 1791-1796.

Gauch H.G. (1992). Statistical analysis of regional yield trials: AMMI analysis of factorial designs. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Gauch J.H.G. and Zobel R.W. (1988). Predictive and postdictive success of statistical analysis of yield trials. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Berlin. p. 76, 1- 10.

Gauch H.G. (2006). Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science, 46(4): 1488-1500.

Gauch H.G. (2013). A simple protocol for AMMI analysis of yield trials. Crop Science, 53(5): 1860-1869.

Gevorkiantz S.R. and Olsen L.P. (1955). Composite Volume Tables for Timber and their Application in the Lake States, USDA, Washington DC, 1104.

Ghosh M., and Sinha B. (2016). Impact of forest policies on timber production in India: A review. Natural Resources Forum, 40(1-2): 62-76.

Gomat H., Deleporte P., Moukini R., Mialounguila G., Ognouabi N., Saya A., Vigneron P. and Saint-Andre L. (2011). What factors influence the stem taper of Eucalyptus: Growth, environmental conditions, or genetics? Annals of Forest Science, 68: 109-120.

Gray H.R. (1918). Volume Measurement of Forest Crops. Australian Forestry, 7(1): 48-74.

Hongyu K. and Garc M. (2014). Statistical analysis of yield trails by AMMI analysis of genotype x environment interaction. Biometrical Letters, 51(2) : 89-102.

Jiang L. Brooks J. R. and Wang J. (2005). Compatible taper and volume equations for yellow-poplar in West Virginia. Forest Ecology and Management, 213(1-3): 399-409.

Kang Manjit S. (1988). A rank-sum method for selecting highyielding, stable corn genotypes. Cereal Research Communications, 16(1/2): 113-115. JSTOR.

Kang Manjit S. (1991). Modified rank-sum method for selecting high yielding, stable crop genotypes. Cereal Research Communications, 19(3): 361-364.

Kellogg R.M. and Warren W.G. (1984). Evaluating western hemlock stem characteristics in terms of lumber value. Wood Fiber Sci., 16: 583-597.

Korkalo P., Korpinen R., Beuker E., Sarjala T., Hellström J., Kaseva J., Lassi U. and Jyske T. (2020). Clonal variation in the bark chemical properties of hybrid aspen: Potential for added value chemicals. Molecules, 25(19).

Koundinya A.V.V. (2019). Phenotypic stability of eggplant for yield and quality through AMMI, GGE and cluster analyses. Scientia Horticulturae, 247(12): 216-223.

Kozak A., Munro D.D. and Smith J.H.G. (1969). Taper functions and their application in forest inventory. The Forestry Chronicle, 45(4): 278-283.

Lai M., Dong L., Yi M., Sun S., Zhang Y., Fu L., Xu Z., Lei L., Leng C. and Zhang L. (2017). Genetic variation, heritability and genotype × environment interactions of resin yield, growth traits and morphologic traits for Pinus elliottii at three progeny trials. Forests, 8(11).

Larson R.P. (1936). Stem form development of trees. Forest Science Monograph-5. Society of American Foresters.

Liu Y., Trancoso R., Ma Q., Yue C., Wei X. and Blanco J.A. (2020). Incorporating climate effects in Larix gmelinii improves stem taper models in the Greater Khingan Mountains of Inner Mongolia, northeast China. Forest Ecology and Management, 464(3): 118065.

Luoma V., Saarinen N., Kankare V., Tanhuanpää T., Kaartinen H., Kukko A., Holopainen M., Hyyppä J. and Vastaranta M. (2019). Examining Changes in Stem Taper and Volume Growth with Two-Date 3D Point Clouds. Forests: 10, 382.

MacFarlane D.W. and Weiskittel A.R. (2016). A new method for capturing stem taper variation for trees of diverse morphological types. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 46(6): 804-815.

Miguel E., Pellico Netto S., Azevedo G., Azevedo G., Rezende A. and Pereira R. (2018). Alternative methods of scaling Eucalyptus urophylla trees in forest stands: Compatibility and accuracy of volume equations. IForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 11(2): 275-283.

Mohammadi R., Abdulahi A., Haghparast R. and Armion M. (2007). Interpreting genotype × environment interactions for durum wheat grain yields using nonparametric methods. Euphytica, 157(1): 239-251.

Mughini G., Alianiello F., Benedetti A., Mughini Gras L., Gras M.A. and Salvati L. (2013). Clonal variation in growth, arsenic and heavy metal uptakes of hybrid Eucalyptus clones in a Mediterranean environment. Agroforestry Systems, 87(4): 755-766.

Muhairwe C.K. (1994). Tree form and taper variation over time for interior lodgepole pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 24: 1904-1913.

Newberry J.D. and Burkhat H.E. (1986). Variable-form stem profile model for loblolly pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 16: 109-114.

Nowosad K., Liersch A., Popławska W. and Bocianowski J. (2016). Genotype by environment interaction for seed yield in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model. Euphytica, 208(1): 187-194.

Oliveira de E.J., de Freitas J.P.X. and de Jesus O.N. (2014). AMMI analysis of the adaptability and yield stability of yellow passion fruit varieties. Scientia Agricola, 71(2): 139-145.

Oyamakin S.O. and Durojaiye M.O. (2020). Sensitivity of Genotype by Environment Interaction Models to Outlying Observations. Asian Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry, 5(2): 29-45.

Pereira J.E.S., Barreto-Garcia P.A.B., de Paula A., de Lima R.B., de Carvalho F.F., Nascimento M. dos S. and Aragão M. de A. (2020). Form Quotient in Estimating Caatinga Tree Volume. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 1-10.

Purchase J.L. (1997). Parametric analysis to describe Genotype X Environment Interaction and Yield Stability in Wheat. PhD thesis.

Purchase J.L., Hatting H. and van Deventer C.S. (2000). Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa: II. Stability analysis of yield performance. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 17(3): 101-107.

Quiñonez-Barraza G., Zhao D., de los Santos-Posadas H.M., Santiago-García W., Tamarit-Urías J.C. and Nájera-Luna J.A. (2019). Compatible taper, volume, green weight, biomass and carbon concentration system for Quercus sideroxyla Bonpl. Revista Chapingo, Serie Ciencias Forestales y Del Ambiente, 25(1): 49-69.

Rajendran P., Arunmaharaja B., Krishnakumar N. and Parthiban K. T. (2019). Clonal variation of Dalbergia sissoo Genetic Resources, 8(11): 271-277.

Ranjani Vijayakumar, Buvaneswaran C. and Warrier R. R. (2015). Clonal Variation in Eucalyptus with Reference to Biochemical Parameters. 3: 14-21.

Rubilar R., Hubbard R., Emhart V., Mardones O., Quiroga J.J., Medina A., Valenzuela H., Espinoza J., Burgos Y. and Bozo D. (2020). Climate and water availability impacts on early growth and growth efficiency of Eucalyptus genotypes: The importance of GxE interactions. Forest Ecology and Management, 458(August): 117763-117763.

Sadeghi S.M., Samizadeh H., Amiri E. and Ashouri M. (2011). Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions (AMMI) analysis of dry leaf yield in tobacco hybrids across environments. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10: 4358-4364.

Saravanan S. (2019). Clonal variation and nutrient use efficiency in eucalyptus. Journal of Tree Sciences, 38(2): 13.

Sharifi P., Aminpanah H., Erfani R., Mohaddesi A. and Abbasian A. (2017). Evaluation of Genotype × Environment Interaction in Rice Based on AMMI Model in Iran. Rice Science, 24: 173-180.

Shelbourne C.J.A. (1970). Tree breeding methods. Tech. Pap. No. 55, New Zealand Forest Service, Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand, 43 pp.

Socha J., and Kulej M. (2007). Variation of the tree form factor and taper in European larch of Polish provenances tested under conditions of the Beskid Sadecki mountain range (southern Poland). Journal of Forest Science, 53(12): 538-547.

Socha J., Netzel P. and Cywicka D. (2020). Stem taper approximation by artificial neural network and a regression set models. Forests, 11(1): 1-14.

Turnblom E.C. and Thomas E. Burk. (1996). Adjusting volume table estimates using normal form quotient. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 26: 155-158.

Valentine H.T., Gregoire T.G. (2001). A switching model of bole taper. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31:1400-1409.

Vanam B. (2019). Timber Trade in India - Challenges and Policies. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR). 5 (12): 119-22.

Westfall J.A., McRoberts R.E., Radtke P.J. and Weiskittel A.R. (2016). Effects of uncertainty in upper-stem diameter information on tree volume estimates. European Journal of Forest Research, 135(5): 937-947.

Yigit N., Sevik H., Cetin M. and Gul L. (2016). Clonal variation in chemical wood characteristics in Hanönü (Kastamonu) Günlüburun black pine (Pinus nigra Arnold. Subsp. Pallasiana (Lamb.) Holmboe) seed orchard. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 35(7): 515-526.

Zobel B.J. and Talbert J. (1984). Applied Forest Tree Improvement (505 p). New York: John Wiley.

Zobel B.J. (1993). Clonal Forestry in the Eucalypts. In: Ahuja MR., Libby W.J. (eds) Clonal Forestry II. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Zobel R.W., Wright M.J. and Gauch H.G. (1988). Statistical Analysis of a Yield Trial. Agron. J., 80: 388-393.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-02-28

How to Cite

Nair, S. G., Veerasamy, S., Vijayaraghavan, A., Suresh, G., Anees, A., Vinothkumar, A., & Yuvaraj, T. (2021). Stability of Stem form Quotient in Clones of <i>Eucalyptus camaldulensis</i> Dehnh across Southern India. Indian Forester, 147(2), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2021/v147i2/155972
Loading...