Traditional and Contemporary Protected areas for Wildlife Conservation in Meghalaya, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2023/v149i10/169438Keywords:
Protected Areas, Sacred Forests, Traditional Forest Management, Wildlife Conservation and Protection.Abstract
Traditional ways of protection and conservation of wildlife, forests and all the natural resources have been suppressed by colonialism, industrialization and a new knowledge system resulting in the biodiversity loss. Then came the new concept of “protected areas†for the conservation and protection of wildlife after the establishment of first National Park, Yellowstone, US in 1872. Even then the threats to wildlife remained or rather increased in a newer form of poaching, habitat disturbances, etc. The model of human-exclusivity (National Parks, Wildlife Sanctuaries, Reserved Forest) is being met with several challenges, favouring the creation of more human-inclusive protected areas that were traditionally present (before establishment of first National Park in 1872) and are now left in a few places like in the State of Meghalaya, due to the provisions of the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution. Meghalaya has both, traditional and contemporary methods of forest management and wildlife conservation and protection. This study clearly indicates that human-inclusive methods (that is traditional forest management) of wildlife and nature conservation need to be maintained and incorporated along with the contemporary methods of wildlife conservation.References
Aengals R., Sathish Kumar, V.M., Palot, M.J. and Ganesh, S.R. (2018). A Checklist of Reptiles of India. Version 3.0. https://www.academia.edu/37111415/A_CHECKLIST_OF_REPTILES_OF_INDIA. Accessed 17 March, 2022.
Agrawal A. and Shrama M. (2021). Tourism a Way to Bring Social Change: A Case Study of Jim-Corbett National Park. Economics, 10: 1-7.
AhutiS.(2015). Industrial growth and environmental degradation. InternationalEducation andResearch Journal,1:5-7.
Amrithalingam A. (2016). Sacred groves of India- an overview. International Journal of Current Research in Biosciences and Plant Biology, 3: 64-74.
Baskaran N., Kanakasabai R. and Desai A.A. (2018). Ranging and spacing behaviour of Asian Elephant (Elephasmaximus Linnaeus) in the tropical forests of Southern India. Indian hotspots, 1: 295-315.
Bhattacharjee S. (2019). Nature in Transition: Transformations in Nature Use, Beliefs and Control in Khasi Hills in Pre-Colonial and Colonial Eras. Summer hill, 25: 30-37.
Bhattarai K.R. and Baral S.R. (2008). Potential role of sacred grove of Lumbini in biodiversity conservation in Nepal. BankoJanakari, 18: 25-31.
Bonney R., Phillips T.B., Ballard H.L. and Enck J.W. (2015). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public understanding of science, 25: 2-16.
C.P.R. Environmental Education Centre. (2021). Sacred groves in Meghalaya. http://www.cpreecenvis.nic.in/Database/Meghalaya_899.aspx. Accessed 28 Dec 2021.
Census (2011). State census, 2011. https://www.census2011.co.in/states.php. Accessed 8 Nov 2021.
Chakrabarty P. and Sadhukhan S.K. (2020). Destination Image for Pilgrimage and Tourism: AStudy in Mount Kailash Region of Tibet. Folia Geographica, 62: 71-86.
Chatterjee N.D. (2016). Man-Elephant Conflict: A Case Study from Forests in West Bengal, India. Springer International Publishing.
Chen B., Coggins C., Minor J. and Zhang Y. (2018). Fengshui forests and village landscapes in China: Geographic extent, socioecological significance, and conservation prospects. Urban forestry and urban greening, 31: 79-92.
Das D. and Balasubramanian A. (2017). The practice of traditional rituals in Naga Aradhana (snake worship): a case study on Aadimoolam Vetticode Sree Nagarajaswami Temple in Kerala, India, International Conference on Communication and Media: An International Communication Association Regional Conference, 00025, SHS Web of conferences, Kuala Lumpur. pp. 1-27.
Dasgupta J. and Symlieh H.J. (2006). Trends in tenure arrangements for forest and their implications for sustainable forest management: the need for a more unified regime. Acase study from Meghalaya, India, in: Reeb, D. and Romano, F.(Eds.),Understanding Forest tenure in South and Southeast Asia. Forestry Policy and Institutions Working Paper No.14., Rome, pp. 59-80.
Dinesh K.P., Radhakrishnan C., Channakeshavamurthy B.H., Deepak P. and Kulkarni N.U. (2020). A Checklist of Amphibians of India with IUCN Conservation Status. Version 3.0 updated till April 2020. Available at http://zsi.gov.in (online only). Kolkatta: Zoological Survey of India.
Dutta S. (2016). A monograph on the elephant-headed God Ganesha: The mythological concept and distinct iconography. In: Asian Elephants in Culture and Nature. University of Kelaniya, Colombo, pp: 70-76.
eBird (2022). Species observed in India. https://ebird.org/india/targets?region=India&r1=IN&bmo=1&emo=12&r2=IN&t2=year&mediaType=.Accessed 19 March, 2022.
Gopi K.C. and Mishra S.S. (2015). Diversity of marine fish of India. In:Venkataraman, K and Sivaperuman, C. (Eds.), Marine faunal diversity in India: taxonomy, ecology and conservation. Academic Press. USA, pp. 171-193.
Government of Meghalaya. (2022). About Meghalaya. https://meghalaya.gov.in/about. Accessed 3 Jan 2022.
Isenberg A. (2000). The destruction of the Bison. Cambridge University Press,Cambridge.
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). (2005). Species extinction: the facts. https://www.iucn.org/sites/dev/files/import/downloads/species_extinction 05_2007.pdf. Accessed 29 March, 2022.
Kumar A. and Marcot B.G. (2010). Key tiger habitats in the Garo Hills of Meghalaya. Journal of Chemo and Biosphere, 1: 90-98.
Lyngdoh A.W., Kumara H.N., Karunakaran P.V. and Babu S. (2019). A review on status of mammals in Meghalaya, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 11: 14955-14970.
Mandala V.R. (2015). The Raj and the paradoxes of wildlife conservation: British attitudes and expediencies. The Historical Journal, 58: 75-110.
Mathur V.B., Uniyal V.K., Tyagi P.C., Bhardwaj A.K., Mohan D., Sen S., Srivastav A., Singh P. and Ansari N.A. (2015). Management Effectiveness Evaluation (MEE) of National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries in India, Process & Outcomes, 2006 to 2014. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun. 209p
Meghalaya Biodiversity Board. (2019). Meghalaya Biodiversity Strategy & Action Plan (MBSAP): 2017-2030. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun.
Meghalaya Biodiversity Board. (2021). Sacred Groves. https://megbiodiversity.nic.in/sacred-groves. Accessed 17 March 2021.
Meghalaya Biodiversity Board. (2022). https://megbiodiversity.nic.in/faunal-diversity. Accessed 23 March, 2022.
Meghalaya Forest Department. (2021a). Forest Cover.http://www.megforest.gov.in/forest_cover.html. Accessed 2 Nov 2021.
Meghalaya Forest Department. (2021b). Reserved Forests. http://www.megforest.gov.in/forest_reserved.html. Accessed 2 Nov 2021.
Meghalaya Forest Department. (2021c). National Parks and Sanctuaries.http://www.megforest.gov.in/wildlife_parks.html. Accessed 2 Nov 2021.
Meghalaya Forest Department. (2021d). Community Reserves. http://www.megforest.gov.in/wildlife_community.html.Accessed 2 Nov 2021.
Meghalaya Forest Department. (2022). Elephant Census. https://megforest.gov.in/wildlife_elephantcensus.html. Accessed on 17 Jun 2022.
Menon V., Kyarong S., Tiwari et al., (2019). Healing the broken spine: a community-led conservation initiative in Garo Hills, Meghalaya, India. In: Forward together: A culture-nature journey towards more effective conservation in a changing world, US National Committee of the International Council on Monuments and Sites (US/ICOMOS), San Francisco, pp. 1-13.
Mint. (2014). TheMithun Forest of Thetsumi. https://www. livemint.com/Politics/ZFPBNcDFbj8zuSok3bcFmJ/The-Mithun-forest-of-Thetsumi.html.Accessed25 Feb 2022.
Mittermeier R.A., Gil P.R., Hoffman. M., (2004). Hotspots revisited: Earth's biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. The University of Chicago Press, Mexico City.
Mohan D., Talukdar G.H., Sen M. and Ansari N.A. (2020). Management Effectiveness Evaluation (MEE) of National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries in India. Process and Outcomes, 2018-19 (Volume IV). Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun.
Mohanta R.K., Bhardwaj A.K., Adhikari B.S. and Mathur P.K. (2009). Distribution and conservation status of sacred groves (SGs) in Garo hills, Meghalaya. Indian Forester, 135: 1627-1649.
Patil V.K. and Bhave S.G. (2010). Industrialisation and wildlife in Konkan. In: Impact of Industrialisation on Ecology of the Konkan. pp. 42-50.
Phillips A. (2004). The history of the international system of protected area management categories. PARKS: The International Journal for Protected Area and Conservation, 14: 4-14.
Prato T. and Fagre D.B. (2014). Protected area management, in:Wang(Eds.), Encyclopedia of Natural Resources Land.CRC Press, New York.
Robin L. (2013). Being first: why the Americans needed it, and why Royal National Park didn't stand in their way. Australian Zoologist, 36: 321-331.
Rots A.P. (2019). Strangers in the sacred grove: The changing meanings of Okinawan Utaki. Religions, 10: 298.
Sarfo-Mensah P. and Oduro W. (2007). Traditional natural resources management practices and biodiversity conservation in Ghana: A review of local concepts and issues on change and sustainability.
Sharma G., Kamalakannan M. and Venkataraman K. (2015). Mammals of India with their distribution and conservation. Calcutta: Zoological Survey of India.
Simberloff D. (1998). Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management passé in the landscape era? Biological conservation, 83: 247-257.
Singh B. and Borthakur S.K. (2015). Forest issues and challenges in protected area management: a case study from Himalayan Nokrek National Park and Biosphere Reserve, India. International Journal of Conservation Science, 6: 233-252.
Tambe S. and Rawat G.S. (2009). Ecology, economics, and equity of the pastoral systems in the Khangchendzonga National Park, Sikkim Himalaya, India. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment, 38: 95-100.
Tamil Nadu Forest Department. (2022). Introduction to wildlife. https://www.forests.tn.gov.in/pages/view/Wildlife-bio. Accessed 23 March 2022.
Tiwari B. and Barik S.K. (2019). Forests and forest-based livelihoods in Meghalaya, India. Preprint.
Tiwari B.K., Barik S.K. and Tripathi R.S. (1998). Biodiversity value, status, and strategies for conservation of sacred groves of Meghalaya, India. Ecosystem Health, 4: 20-32.
Tiwari S. (2009). Origin of Environmental Science from Vedas. http://www.sanskrit.nic.in/SVimarsha/V2/c17.pdf. Accessed 21 February 2022.
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). (2020). Bodg Khan Uul Biosphere Reserve, Mongolia. https://en.unesco.org/biosphere/aspac/bodg-khan_uul.Accessed 19 December 2021.
Upadhaya K., Thapa N., Lakadong N.J., Barik S.K. and Sarma K. (2013). Priority areas for conservation in northeast India: a case study in Meghalaya based on plant species diversity and endemism. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 39: 125-136.
Wadley R.L. and Colfer C.J.P. (2004). Sacred forest, hunting, and conservation in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Human Ecology, 32: 313-338.
Wildlife Trust of India (2021). GHDAC creates Hoolock Gibobon Reserves in Meghalaya. Accessed on 15 March 2022.
Wildlife Institute of India. (2022). Biosphere Reserves. http://www.wiienvis.nic.in/Database/BiosphereReserves_8225.aspx. Accessed 11 March 2022.
Williams A.C. and Johnsingh A.J.T. (1996). Status survey of Elephants and their habitats in Garo Hills, North East India. GAJAH, 16: 43 – 60.
Woinarski J.C., BurbidgeA.A. and Harrison P.L. (2015). Ongoing unravelling of a continental fauna: decline and extinction of Australian mammals since European settlement, in: proceedings ofNationalAcademyofSciences,pp.4531-4540.
Wolflang B.M. (2003). Khasi myths: an interpretative study. PhD dissertation. North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Unless otherwise stated, copyright or similar rights in all materials presented on the site, including graphical images, are owned by Indian Forester.
