Assessment of Biomass Dynamics and Structural Functional Attributes in West-Central Himalayan Forest Ecosystems

Bhawana Sorangi; Anil Kumar Yadava; Subrat Sharma; R. Arun Kumar

doi:10.36808/if/2024/v150i11/170422

Assessment of Biomass Dynamics and Structural Functional Attributes in West-Central Himalayan Forest Ecosystems

Authors

Bhawana Sorangi G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora 263643
Anil Kumar Yadava Department of Forestry, Soban Singh Jeena University, Almora 263601
Subrat Sharma University of Ladakh (Ladakh UT), Ladakh 194104
R. Arun Kumar Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, Dehradun- 248006

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2024/v150i11/170422

Keywords:

Biomass Dynamics, Forest Ecosystems, Structural-Functional Attributes, and Ecological Dynamics.

Abstract

The study highlights significant disparities between Oak and Pine forests in the West-Central Himalayas, showcasing Oak forests higher species richness, tree density, biomass, and net primary productivity, emphasizing the need for informed conservation strategies. Notable differences were observed between Oak and Pine forests. Oak forests displayed higher species richness, with tree densities ranging from 12 to 624 trees/ha, surpassing those of Pine forests (2 to 810 trees/ha). Biomass assessments indicated Oak forests' superiority, boasting an average above-ground biomass of 326.35 t/ha, significantly greater than that of Pine forests (286.53 t/ha). Additionally, Oak forests exhibited higher net primary productivity (NPP), ranging from 10.28 to 23.07 t/ha/yr, contrasting with Pine forests' NPP values of 23.07 t/ha/yr. These findings underscore the critical importance of comprehending ecological dynamics to inform effective forest management and conservation strategies in the West-Central Himalayas.

References

Bargali S.S. and Singh R.P. (1997). Pinus patula plantations in Kumaun Himalaya. I. Dry matter dynamics. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 526-535.

Bhatt B.P. and Sachan M.S. (2004). Firewood consumption along an altitudinal gradient in mountain villages of India. Biomass and Bioenergy, 27(1): 69-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.10.004

Bohn H.L. (1997). Estimation of organic carbon in the world II. Soil Science American Journal, 40: 468-470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1976.03615995004000030045x

Brown S. (1997). Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: a primer. FAO Forestry Paper, Rome Italy, 134.

Brown S., Gillespie A.J. and Lugo A.E. (1989). Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. Forest science, 35(4): 881-902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/35.4.881

Cottam G. and Curtis J.T. (1956). The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology, 35: 451-460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1930167

Dhar U., Rawal R.S. and Samant S.S. (1997). Structural diversity and representativeness of forest vegetation in a protected area of Kumaun Himalaya, India: Implication for conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 6: 1045-1062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018375932740

Gairola S., Sharma C.M., Ghildiyal S.K. and Suyal S. (2011). Live tree biomass and carbon variation along an altitudinal gradient in moist temperate valley slopes of the Garhwal Himalaya (India). Current Science, 1862-1870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2011.597109

Giri D., Tewari A. and Rawat Y.S. (2008). Vegetational analysis in mixed Banj (Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus) and Tilonj Oak (Quercus floribunda Lindl.) forests in Nainital Catchment. Indian Journal of Forestry, 31(2): 167-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2008-F61I6A

Gosain B.G., Negi G.C., Dhyani P.P., Bargali S.S. and Saxena R. (2015). Ecosystem services of forests: Carbon Stock in vegetation and soil components in a watershed of Kumaun Himalaya, India. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 41(3-4): 177-188.

Hashiramoto O. (2007). Wood-product trade and policy issues. In Cross-sectoral policy developments in forestry (pp. 24-35). Wallingford UK: CABI. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845932503.0024

Haripriya G.S. (2000). Estimates of biomass in Indian forests. Biomass and bioenergy, 19(4): 245-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00040-4

Joshi G. and Negi G.C. (2011). Quantification and valuation of forest ecosystem services in the western Himalayan region of India. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 7(1): 2-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2011.598134

Karekezi S. and Kithyoma W. (2006). Bioenergy and agriculture: promises and challenges. Focus, 14.

Kala C.P. (2004). Indigenous uses and structure of Chir Pine forests in Uttaranchal Himalaya, India. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 11: 205-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500409469824

Khera N., Kumar A., Ram J. and Tewari A. (2001). Plant biodiversity assessment in relation to disturbances in mid-elevational forest of Central Himalaya, India. Tropical Ecology, 42(1): 83-95.

Kusum Lata K.L. and Bisht N.S. (1991). Quantitative analysis and regeneration potential of moist temperate forest in Garhwal Himalaya.

McDicken K.A. (1997). guide to monitoring carbon storage in Forestry, Agroforestry projects. Arlington VA. Winrock International, Arlington, VA, USA., 87.

Negi K.S., Rawat Y.S. and Singh J.S. (1983). Estimation of biomass and nutrient storage in a Himalayan moist temperate forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 13(6): 1185-1196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/x83-157

Pielou E.C. (1966). The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13: 131- 144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0

Prescott C.E. (2002). The influence of the forest canopy on nutrient cycling. Tree physiology, 22(15-16): 1193-1200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/22.15-16.1193

Rana B.S. (1985). Biomass and Net Primary Productivity in Different Forest Ecosystems Along an Altitudinal Gradient in Kumaun Himalaya. Ph.D. Thesis, Kumaun University, Nainital, 323 pages.

Rana B.S., Singh S.P. and Singh R.P. (1989). Carbon and energy dynamic of seven Central Himalayan forests. Tropical Ecology, 30(2): 253-264.

Rana B.S. (1985). Biomass and net primary productivity in different forest ecosystems along an altitudinal gradient in Kumaun Himalaya.

Ralhan P.K., Saxena A.K. and Singh J.S. (1982). Analysis of forest vegetation at and around Naini Tal in Kumaun Himalaya. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy-Part B: Biological Sciences, 48(1): 121-137.

Rawat Y.S. (1983). Plant biomass, net primary production and nutrient cycling in oak forests. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Kumaun, Naini Tal.

Saxena A.K. and Singh J.S. (1982). A phytosociological analysis of woody species in forest communities of a part of Kumaun Himalaya. Vegetation, 50(1): 3-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120674

Salunkhe O., Khare P.K., Sahu T.R. and Singh S. (2016). Estimation of tree biomass reserves in tropical deciduous forests of Central India by non-destructive approach. Tropical Ecology, 57(2): 153-161.

Shannon C.E. and Weiner W. (1963). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, USA, 117 pages.

Sharma C.M., Gairola S., Baduni N.P., Ghildiyal S.K. and Suyal S. (2011). Variation in carbon stocks on different slope aspects in seven major forest types of temperate region of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Journal of biosciences, 36: 701-708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-011-9103-4

Sheikh M.A. and Kumar M. (2010). Nutrient status and economic analysis of soils in oak and pine forests in Garhwal Himalaya. Quercus, 1(1): 1600-1800.

Singh J.S., Rawat Y.S. and Chaturvedi O.P. (1984). Replacement of oak forest with pine in the Himalaya affects the nitrogen cycle. Nature, 311(5981): 54-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/311054a0

Singh J.S. and Singh S.P. (1984). An Integrated Ecological Study of Eastern Kumaun Himalaya with Emphasis on Natural Resources. Final Report (HCS/DST/187/76). Kumaun University, Naini Tal. Volumes 1-3.

Simpson E.H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 688 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0

Singh S.P., Adhikari B.S. and Zobel D.B. (1994). Biomass, productivity, leaf longevity, and forest structure in the central Himalaya. Ecological Monographs, 64(4): 401-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2937143

Singh J.S. and Singh S.P. (1992). Forests of Himalaya: Structure, Functioning and Impact of Man, Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital. India 294 pages.

Tripathi B.S., Rikhari H.C. and Singh R.P. (1987). Dominance and diversity distribution in certain forest of Kumaun Himalayas. In IX International symposium on tropical ecology (Vol. 235).

Uniyal P., Pokhriyal P., Dasgupta S., Bhatt D. and Todaria N.P. (2010). Plant diversity in two forest types along the disturbance gradient in Dewalgarh Watershed, Garhwal Himalaya. Current Science, 938-943.