Comparing Phytosociological Attributes for Trees Outside Forest and Enrichment Plantation: Strategies for Sustainable Urban Forest Management

Comparing Phytosociological Attributes for Trees Outside Forest and Enrichment Plantation: Strategies for Sustainable Urban Forest Management

Authors

  •   Paromita Ghosh   G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora – 263643, Uttarakhand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2025/v151i6/170760

Keywords:

Anand van, Enrichment plantation, Indian Himalayan region, Nanda van, Trees outside forests, Sustainable urban forest management.

Abstract

Trees Outside Forests (TOF) and Enrichment Plantations (EP) are strategies used in urban forestry management to increase green cover and address various ecological issues such as deforestation. The Government of India has initiated the promotion of TOF and EP to address resource demands and provide various ecosystem services in urban and semi-urban areas. This study examined Anand Van (an urban TOF) in Dehradun and Nanda Van (an EP) in Almora, focusing on their ecological attributes that reflect the suitability of the two forest management systems to address environmental challenges. Phytosociological analysis revealed that broad-leaved Mallotus philippinensis was the dominant species in Anand Van, whereas needleleaved Pinus roxburghii was the dominant species in Nanda Van. The importance value index (IVI) indicates higher ecological significance for TOF due to their more diverse mixed vegetation and natural regeneration, resulting in higher biodiversity compared to EP. Recognizing the complementarity of these strategies and spreading awareness among stakeholders is essential for sustainable urban forest management. A location-specific mixed-method approach of both strategies can help improve urban greenery and ecosystem services and augment business strategy through natural resource management.

References

Chaturvedi A.N. and Khanna L.S. (1982). Forest mensuration, 92. International Book Distributors, Dehradun.

Curtis J.T. and McIntosh R.P. (1950). The interrelation of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology, 31: 434-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1931497

Curtis J.T. (1959). The vegetation of Wisconsin: An ordination of plant communities. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

FAO. (2019). Restoring forest landscapes through assisted natural regeneration (ANR) – A practical manual. Bangkok.Pp.1-52. https://www.fao.org/3/ca4191en/CA4191EN.pdf

FAO. (2022). The state of the world's forests 2022. Forest pathways for green recovery and building inclusive, resilient and sustainable economies. FAO, Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb9360en

Graudal L., Aravanopoulos F., Bennadji Z., Changtragoon S., Fady B., Kjaer E.D., Loo J., Ramamonjisoa L. and Vendramin G.G. (2014). Global to local genetic diversity indicators of evolutionary potential in tree species within and outside forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 333: 35-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.002

ISFR (India State of Forest Report) (2021). Forest Survey of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests & Climate Change, Government of India. Dehradun, India. Available online: https://fsi.nic.in/forest-report-2021. (Accessed 21 April2023)

Knight D.H. (1963). A distance method for constructing forest profile diagrams and obtaining structural data. Tropical Ecology, 4: 89-94.

Magurran A.E. (1988). Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement, pp.7-45. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0_2

Mason N.W.H., MacGillivray K., Steel J.B. and Wilson J.B. (2003). An index of functional diversity. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14: 571–578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02184.x

Phillips E.A. (1959). Methods of Vegetation Study. Henry Holt, New York, US.

Shannon-Wiener C.E., Weaver W. and Weater W.J. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Mathematical Theory of Communication. EUA Univ.

Shrestha B.M., Chang S.X., Bork E.W. and Carlyle C.N. (2018). Enrichment planting and soil amendments enhance carbon sequestration and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in agroforestry systems: A review. Forests, 9(6): 369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f9060369

Simpson E.H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163(41): 688-688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0

Singh S., Malik Z.A. and Sharma C.M. (2016). Tree species richness, diversity and regeneration status in different oak (Quercus spp.) dominated forests of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 9: 293-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2016.06.002

Thomas N., Baltezar P., Lagomasino D., Stovall A., Iqbal Z. and Fatoyinbo L. (2021). Treesoutside forests are an underestimated resource in a country with low forest cover. Scientific Reports, 11(1): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86944-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86944-2

Whittaker R.H. (1977). Evolution of species diversity in land plant communities. Evolutionary Biology, 10: 1-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6953-4_1

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Paromita Ghosh, G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora – 263643, Uttarakhand

Scientist -F, & Head, CSED

Published

2025-07-22

How to Cite

Ghosh, P. (2025). Comparing Phytosociological Attributes for Trees Outside Forest and Enrichment Plantation: Strategies for Sustainable Urban Forest Management. Indian Forester, 151(6), 546‐550. https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2025/v151i6/170760

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Loading...