Local Community's Perception towards a Protected Area in the Shivalik Landscape, India

Sakshi Rana; Priti Kumari; Ruchi Badola; Syed Ainul Hussain

doi:10.36808/if/2025/v151i10/170899

Local Community's Perception towards a Protected Area in the Shivalik Landscape, India

Authors

Sakshi Rana Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248001, Uttarakhand
Priti Kumari Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248001, Uttarakhand
Ruchi Badola Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248001, Uttarakhand
Syed Ainul Hussain Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248001, Uttarakhand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2025/v151i10/170899

Keywords:

Perception, Attitude, Local communities, Park–people relationship, Management of protected area.

Abstract

In Global South, Protected Areas (PAs) in human-dominated landscapes create unavoidable trade offs between biodiversity conservation and local livelihoods. The authors surveyed 157 respondents adjacent to Kalesar National Park and Wildlife Sanctuary (KNPWLS) in Shivalik Landscape, India to assess perceived benefits and costs of living near the PA and perception towards it. Overall, 81.5% of respondents recognized Kalesar Forest as a PA, while about 78% of them supported the continued existence of the PA. Perceived benefits centred on access to fuelwood, fodder and other forest products. The principal costs were crop and livestock losses attributable to wild animals. Despite these recurrent losses, most respondents maintained positive attitudes toward conservation, suggesting that support can be sustained when livelihood needs are acknowledged and addressed. These findings highlight the need for locally tailored co management strategies that extend tangible benefits, such as equitable tourism revenue, alternative fodder sources and rapid compensation for wildlife damage to the most vulnerable groups. By shifting from top down enforcement to participatory governance and targeted benefit sharing, managers can foster durable community support and reconcile conservation goals with human well being across densely settled PA landscapes in South Asia.

References

Allendorf T.D. (2020). A global summary of local residents' attitudes toward protected areas. Human Ecology, 48(1): 111118.

Allendorf T.D. (2022). A global summary of local residents' perceptions of benefits and problems of protected areas. Biodiversity and Conservation, 31(2): 379-396.

Anaya F.C. and Espírito-Santo M.M. (2018). Protected areas and territorial exclusion of traditional communities. Ecology and Society, 23(1).

Andrade G.S. and Rhodes J.R. (2012). Protected areas and local communities: an inevitable partnership toward successful conservation strategies?. Ecology and society, 17(4).

Archer L.J., Müller H.S., Jones L.P., Ma H., Gleave R.A., da Silva Cerqueira A., McMurdo Hamilton T. and Shennan-Farpón Y. (2022). Towards fairer conservation: Perspectives and ideas from early-career researchers. People and Nature, 4(3): 612626.

Badola R., Barthwal S. and Hussain S.A. (2012). Attitudes of local communities towards conservation of mangrove forests: A case study from the east coast of India. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 96: 188-196.

Badola R. (1998). Attitudes of local people towards conservation and alternatives to forest resources: A case study from the lower Himalayas. Biodiversity & Conservation, 7: 1245-1259.

Bhola N., Klimmek H., Kingston N., Burgess N.D., van Soesbergen A., Corrigan C. and Kok M.T. (2021). Perspectives on area-based conservation and its meaning for future biodiversity policy. Conservation Biology, 35(1): 168-178.

Champion H.G. and Seth S.K. (1964). The Forest Types of India. 653p De Pourcq K., Thomas E., Arts B., Vranckx A., León-Sicard T.

and Van Damme P. (2015). Conflict in protected areas: who says co-management does not work?. PloS one, 10(12): e0144943.

Duffy R., Massé F., Smidt E., Marijnen E., Büscher B., Verweijen J. and Lunstrum E. (2019). Why we must question the militarisation of conservation. Biological conservation, 232: 66-73.

Harihar A., Pandav B. and Goyal S.P. (2009). Responses of tiger (Panthera tigris) and their prey to removal of anthropogenic influences in Rajaji National Park, India. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 55(2): 97-105.

He S. and Jiao W. (2023). Conservation-compatible livelihoods: An approach to rural development in protected areas of developing countries. Environmental Development, 45: 100797.

Hirschnitz Garbers M. and Stoll Kleemann S. (2011). Opportunities and barriers in the implementation of protected area management: a qualitative meta-analysis of case studies from European protected areas. The Geographical Journal, 177(4): 321-334.

IPBES. (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Inter-governmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES secretariat, 1148.

Jiju J.S., Dasgupta S., Kumar A. and Gera M. (2021). Assessment of dependency and consumption pattern of different forest products by the forest fringe villages of Shivalik Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. bioRxiv, 2021-04.

Johnsingh A.J.T., Ramesh K., Qureshi Q., David A., Goyal S.P., Rawat G.S. and Prasad S. (2004). Conservation status of tiger and associated species in the Terai Arc Landscape, India. RR04/001, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, pp. viii+ 110.

Karanth K.K., Gupta S. and Vanamamalai A. (2018). Compensation payments, procedures and policies towards human-wildlife conflict management: Insights from India. Biological Conservation, 227: 383-389.

Kettunen M. and ten Brink P. (2013). Scoping Assessment of Benefits Provided by Protected Areas. In Social and Economic Benefits of Protected Areas (pp. 59-79). Routledge.

Kumar P., Chandel S., Kumar V. and Sankhyan V. (2017). Leopard–human conflict led casualties and conservation awareness campaign in Shivalik hills of northern India.

Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, India section b: biological sciences, 87(3): 893-898.

Kumar V., Attri V., Rana D.S. and Chauhan S.K. (2022). 'Crop Raiding': Farmers' Perspectives in Shiwalik Hills of NorthWestern Himalayas, India. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy, 25(4): 301-313.

Lasgorceix A. and Kothari A. (2009). Displacement and relocation of protected areas: a synthesis and analysis of case studies. Economic and political weekly, 37-47.

Mandeville C.P., Nilsen E.B., Herfindal I. and Finstad A.G. (2023). Participatory monitoring drives biodiversity knowledge in global protected areas. Communications Earth & Environment, 4(1): 240.

Manral U., Sengupta S., Hussain S.A., Rana S. and Badola R. (2016). Human wildlife conflict in India: a review of economic implication of loss and preventive measures. Indian Forester, 142(10): 928-940.

Mogomotsi P.K., Stone L.S., Mogomotsi G.E.J. and Dube N. (2020). Factors influencing community participation in wildlife conservation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 25(4): 372-386.

Nyhus P.J., Fisher H., Osofsky S. and Madden F. (2003). Taking the bite out of wildlife damage: the challenges of wildlife compensation schemes. Conservation Magazine (formerly Conservation in Practice), 37.

Ogra M. (2009). Attitudes toward resolution of human–wildlife conflict among forest-dependent agriculturalists near Rajaji National Park, India. Human Ecology, 37: 161-177.

Ogra M. and Badola R. (2008). Compensating human–wildlife conflict in protected area communities: ground-level perspectives from Uttarakhand, India. Human Ecology, 36: 717-729.

Oldekop J.A., Gabay M., Humphreys D., Kamoto J.F., Mutta D.N., Song C. and Stoian D. (2021). A framework for analysing contextual factors shaping forest-poverty dynamics. Forest Policy and Economics, 132: 102591.

Pfaff A., Robalino J., Lima E., Sandoval C. and Herrera L.D. (2014). Governance, location and avoided deforestation from protected areas: greater restrictions can have lower impact, due to differences in location. World Development, 55: 7-20.

Rani M., Singh S.K., Allen M.L., Pandey P. and Singh R. (2024). Measuring people's attitude towards conservation of Leopard Panthera pardus (Mammalia: Carnivora) in the foothills of Himalayan region. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 16(6): 2528325298.

Redford K.H. and Fearn E. (Eds.). (2007). Protected areas and human displacement: a conservation perspective (Vol. 29). New York: Wildlife Conservation Society.

Schleicher J., Zaehringer J.G., Fastré C., Vira B., Visconti P. and Sandbrook C. (2019). Protecting half of the planet could directly affect over one billion people. Nature Sustainability, 2(12): 1094-1096.

Semwal P.P. and Devi N. P. (2023). Effect of household determinants on conservation attitude of Taungyas of Rajaji National Park, India. In Advanced Research and Review in Multidisciplinary. M/S DOLPHIN Group of Publication

Sena-Vittini M., Gomez-Valenzuela V. and Ramirez K. (2023). Social perceptions and conservation in protected areas: Taking stock of the literature. Land Use Policy, 131: 106696.

Sivakumar K., Sathyakumar S. and Rawat G.S. (2010). A preliminary review on conservation status of Shivalik Landscape in Northwest, India. Indian Forester, 136(10): 1376.

Stolton S., Dudley N., AvcıoğluÇokçalışkan B., Hunter D., Ivanić K.Z., Kanga E. and Waithaka J. (2015). Values and benefits of protected areas. Protected area governance and management, 145-168.

Vodouhê F.G., Coulibaly O., Adégbidi A. and Sinsin B. (2010). Community perception of biodiversity conservation within protected areas in Benin. Forest Policy and Economics, 12(7): 505-512.

Woodhouse E., Bedelian C., Barnes P., Cruz-Garcia G.S., Dawson N., Gross-Camp N., Homewood K., Jones J.P., Martin A., Morgera E. and Schreckenberg K. (2022). Rethinking entrenched narratives about protected areas and human wellbeing in the Global South. UCL Open Environment, 4: e050.