Urban Green Infrastructure for Carbon Sequestration: Integrating Land Restoration, Biodiversity Conservation and Climate Mitigation

Urban Green Infrastructure for Carbon Sequestration: Integrating Land Restoration, Biodiversity Conservation and Climate Mitigation

Authors

  •   Abhishek Nandal   Department of Botany, Government Post Graduate College for Women, Rohtak (Haryana) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0238-8761
  •   Surender Singh Yadav   Department of Botany, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak (Haryana) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4631-1253
  •   Priyanka Sharma   Department of Botany, Government Post Graduate College for Women, Rohtak (Haryana)
  •   Kailash Chand Meena   Department of Botany, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak (Haryana)
  •   Sakshi Saini   Department of Botany, Government College Matanhail, Jhajjar (Haryana)
  •   Gaurav Mishra   Centre of Excellence on Sustainable Land Management of the Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, Dehradun (Uttarakhand)
  •   Amrender Singh Rao   Varka Consulting, Gurugram (Haryana)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2026/v152i6A/171267

Keywords:

Urban Green Infrastructure (UGI), Carbon sequestration, Land restoration, Biodiversity conservation, Climate mitigation.

Abstract

Urban regions account for around 70% of worldwide Carbon dioxide (CO ) 2 emissions despite comprising less than 2% of the land; yet urban green infrastructure (UGI) remains inadequately employed as a climate mitigation approach. This paper formulates a cohesive framework that identifies carbon sequestration, land restoration, and biodiversity conservation as interconnected elements of urban climate initiatives. Using peer-reviewed literature, it demonstrates that UGI types vary in carbon storage capacity; however, results are significantly affected by species composition, soil health, management approaches, and urban environmental limitations. Land restoration strategies, such as brown field rehabilitation, phytoremediation, and soil supplements, coupled with biodiversity-focused design that prioritizes native species and ecological linkages, are recognized as essential for enduring carbon sequestration. Case studies from Singapore, Medellín, New York City, and several Indian cities illustrate that UGI can yield quantifiable climatic and ancillary benefits, such as urban cooling, storm water management, and biodiversity restoration, when underpinned by sustained governance and oversight. Nonetheless, fragmented planning, insufficient funding, the absence of uniform carbon accounting, and equity issues, including green gentrification, hinder broader implementation. The article advocates for enforceable planning objectives, standardized monitoring, reporting, and verification mechanisms, incorporation into national climate programs, and equity safeguards to facilitate scalable and equitable implementation.

References

Behera S.K., Mishra S., Sahu N., Manika N., Singh S.N., Anto S., Kumar R., Husain R., Verma A.K. and Pandey N. (2022). Assessment of carbon sequestration potential of tropical tree species for urban forestry in India. Ecological Engineering, 181: 106692.

Bherwani H., Banerji T. and Menon R. (2024). Role and value of urban forests in carbon sequestration: Review and assessment in Indian context. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(1): 603–626.

Cambou A., Chevallier T., Barthès B.G., Derrien D., Cannavo P., Bouchard A., Allory V., Schwartz C. and Vidal-Beaudet L. (2023). The impact of urbanization on soil organic carbon stocks and particle size and density fractions. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 23(2): 792–803.

Celletti S., Poreba L., Wawer R., Padoan E., Comis S., Bartosiewicz B. and Schiavon M. (2025). The potential of nature-based solutions for urban soils: Focus on green infrastructure and bioremediation. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 13.

Chen S., Wang W., Xu W., Wang Y., Wan H., Chen D., Tang Z., Tang X., Zhou G., Xie Z., Zhou D., Shangguan Z., Huang J., He J.S., Wang Y., Sheng J., Tang L., Li X., Dong M. and Bai Y. (2018). Plant diversity enhances productivity and soil carbon storage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(16): 4027–4032.

Creasy A. and Maxwell K. (2024). Addressing green gentrification: Actions and recommendations for global cities. Journal of City Climate Policy and Economy, 2(3): 359–371.

European Environment Agency (2022). Urban sprawl continues at the cost of nature in Europe. European Environment Agency.

Fry M., Babino R., Coles A.R., Alexander K.P., Williamson B. and Ponette-González A.G. (2025). Digital tools in urban forestry. NPJ Urban Sustainability, 6(1): 20.

Getter K.L., Rowe D.B., Robertson G.P., Cregg B.M. and Andresen J.A. (2009). Carbon sequestration potential of extensive green roofs. Environmental Science and Technology, 43(19): 7564–7570.

Guo H., Du E., Terrer C. and Jackson R.B. (2024). Global distribution of surface soil organic carbon in urban greenspaces. Nature Communications, 15(1): 806.

Habib S., Tahir F., Hussain F., Macauley N. and Al-Ghamdi S.G. (2023). Current and emerging technologies for carbon accounting in urban landscapes: Advantages and limitations. Ecological Indicators, 154: 110603.

Hautamäki R., Kulmala L., Ariluoma M. and Järvi L. (2025). How urban green infrastructure contributes to carbon neutrality. Buildings and Cities, 6(1).

Ho V.H., Morita H., Ho T.H. and Bachofer F. (2025). Spatiotemporal evolution of ecosystem carbon storage under land use/land cover dynamics in the coastal region of central Vietnam. Advances in Space Research, 76(9): 4815–4837.

Hou D., Al-Tabbaa A., O'Connor D., Hu Q., Zhu Y.G., Wang L., Kirkwood N., Ok Y.S., Tsang D.C.W., Bolan N.S. and Rinklebe J. (2023). Sustainable remediation and redevelopment of brownfield sites. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 4(4): 271–286.

Huovila A., Siikavirta H., Antuña Rozado C., Rökman J., Tuominen P., Paiho S., Hedman Å. and Ylén P. (2022). Carbonneutral cities: Critical review of theory and practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 341: 130912.

IEA (2024). Empowering urban energy transitions. International Energy Agency.

IPCC (2023). Urban systems and other settlements. In: Climate change 2022—mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press, pp. 861–952.

Jenerette G.D. and Herrmann D.L. (2024). A global synthesis of reported urban tree carbon production rates and approaches. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 11.

Karahan A., Demircan N., Özgeriş M., Gökçe O. and Karahan F. (2025). Integration of drones in landscape research: Technological approaches and applications. Drones, 9(9).

Karvinen E., Backman L., Järvi L. and Kulmala L. (2024). Soil respiration across a variety of tree-covered urban green spaces in Helsinki, Finland. SOIL, 10(1): 381–406.

Kumar P., Sahani J., Corada Perez K., Ahlawat A., Andrade M.F., Athanassiadou M., Cao S.J., Collins L., Dey S., Di Sabatino S., Halios C.H., Harris F., Horton C., Inostroza L., Jones L., Kjeldsen T.R., McCallan B., McNabola A., Mishra R.K. and Yao R. (2025). Urban greening for climate resilient and sustainable cities: Grand challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 7.

Lal R. (2004). Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 304(5677): 1623–1627.

Lampinen J., García-Antúnez O., Olafsson A.S., Kavanagh K.C., Gulsrud N.M. and Raymond C.M. (2022). Envisioning carbon-smart and just urban green infrastructure. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 75: 127682.

Lewartowska E., Anguelovski I., Oscilowicz E., Triguero-Mas M., Cole H., Shokry G., Pérez-del-Pulgar C. and Connolly J.J.T. (2024). Racial inequity in green infrastructure and gentrification: Challenging compounded environmental racisms in the green city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 48(2): 294–322.

Liu Z., Deng Z., Davis S.J. and Ciais P. (2024). Global carbon emissions in 2023. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 5(4): 253–254.

Mazon J. (2025). Integrating urban tree carbon sequestration into metropolitan ecosystem services for climate-neutral cities: A citizen science-based methodology. Urban Science, 9(11).

McPhearson T., Frantzeskaki N., Ossola A., Diep L., Anderson P.M.L., Blatch T., Collier M.J., Cook E.M., Culwick Fatti C., Grabowski Z.J., Grimm N.B., Haase D., Herreros-Cantis P., Kavonic J., Lin B.B., Lopez Meneses D.H., Matsler A.M., Moglia M., Morató J. and Zhou W. (2025). Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(29): e2315910121.

Meineke E., Youngsteadt E., Dunn R.R. and Frank S.D. (2016). Urban warming reduces aboveground carbon storage. Proceedings of the Royal Society B., 283(1840): 20161574.

Mutillod C., Buisson E., Mahy G., Jaunatre R., Bullock J.M., Tatin L. and Dutoit T. (2024). Ecological restoration and rewilding: Two approaches with complementary goals? Biological Reviews, 99(3): 820–836.

Nowak D.J. and Crane D.E. (2002). Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environmental Pollution, 116(3): 381–389.

Nowak D.J., Greenfield E.J., Hoehn R.E. and Lapoint E. (2013). Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in urban and community areas of the United States. Environmental Pollution, 178: 229–236.

NParks (2026). Annual report 2023–2024. National Parks Board.

Peng L.L.H. and Jim C.Y. (2015). Economic evaluation of green-roof environmental benefits in the context of climate change: The case of Hong Kong. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 14(3): 554–561.

Pregitzer C.C., Hanna C., Charlop-Powers S. and Bradford M.A. (2022). Estimating carbon storage in urban forests of New York City. Urban Ecosystems, 25(2): 617–631.

Ramachandran A., Kumar D.S., Mathivanan M., Ahamed I.S. and Joseph K. (2024). Enhancing carbon sink: Challenges in urban forestry of major cities in Tamil Nadu, India. International Journal of Advanced Natural Sciences and Engineering Researches, 8(5): 342–366.

Rigolon A. and Németh J. (2020). Green gentrification or 'just green enough': Do park location, size and function affect whether a place gentrifies or not? Urban Studies, 57(2): 402–420.

Rigolon A., Collins T., Kim J., Stuhlmacher M. and Christensen J. (2024). Does gentrification precede and follow greening? Evidence about the green gentrification cycle in Los Angeles and Chicago. Landscape and Urban Planning, 248: 105095.

Seidu S., Chan D.W.M. and Taiwo R. (2025). Integrating green and grey infrastructure systems in dense urban regions: A synthesis of critical barriers and effective implementation guidelines. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 27(12): 7555–7576.

Seto K.C., Güneralp B. and Hutyra L.R. (2012). Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(40): 16083–16088.

Shah A.M., Liu G., Nawab A., Li H., Xu D., Yeboah F.K., Yang Q. and Zhang L. (2024). Sustainability and resilience interface at typical urban green and blue infrastructures: Costs, benefits, and impacts assessment. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 6.

Surin S. (2023). The green does not have to lose the battle to the grey in our cities. Question of Cities. Thomson E. (2024). How cities from Medellín to Düsseldorf are using nature to tackle extreme heat. World Economic Forum.

Trémeau J., Olascoaga B., Backman L., Karvinen E., Vekuri H. and Kulmala L. (2024). Lawns and meadows in urban green space: A comparison from perspectives of greenhouse gases, drought resilience and plant functional types. Biogeosciences, 21: 949–972.

UCL (2022). Medellín: A new chapter of resilience. University College London.

UNDP (2024). Urban content of NDCs: Local climate action explored through in-depth country analyses. United Nations Development Programme.

UNEP (2018). World urbanization prospects: 2018 revision. United Nations.

UNEP (2024). Colombian cities weave nature back into their urban fabric. United Nations Environment Programme.

UN-Habitat (2024). Urban content of NDCs: Local climate action explored through in-depth country analyses. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.

Vaz A.S., Castro-Díez P., Godoy O., Alonso Á., Vilà M., Saldaña A., Marchante H., Bayón Á., Silva J.S., Vicente J.R. and

Honrado J.P. (2018). An indicator-based approach to analyse the effects of non-native tree species on multiple cultural ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 85: 48–56.

Wang D. and Xu P.Y. (2024). Urban green infrastructure: Bridging biodiversity conservation and sustainable urban development through adaptive management approach. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 12.

Weiskopf S.R., Isbell F., Arce-Plata M.I., Di Marco M., Harfoot M., Johnson J., Lerman, S.B., Miller B.W., Morelli T.L., Mori

A.S., Weng E. and Ferrier S. (2024). Biodiversity loss reduces global terrestrial carbon storage. Nature Communications, 15(1): 4354.

Zarei M. and Shahab S. (2025). Nature-based solutions in urban green infrastructure: A systematic review of success factors and implementation challenges. Land, 14(4).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Nandal, A., Yadav, S. S., Sharma, P., Meena, K. C., Saini, S., Mishra, G., & Rao, A. S. (2026). Urban Green Infrastructure for Carbon Sequestration: Integrating Land Restoration, Biodiversity Conservation and Climate Mitigation. Indian Forester, 152(6A), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2026/v152i6A/171267
Loading...