Treelands or Grasslands in the Rajputana Desert ?

Abstract

Extension of the Rajputana Desert is highly controversial. But, what is agreed upon is the existing unfavourable conditions. Deforestation is reported to be the main cause of extreme arid conditions. Therefore, afforestation appears to be the main cure. As far back as 1945, Mr. J. Petty recommended very similar to what the ad hoc committee recommended in 1952. The main burden of their song is the creation of forests to the extent of 50% of the total land area. Afforestation having been accepted in principle, the question to be answered is: under the existing conditions, what would constitute the best land use - treelands or grasslands? Botanically, grasslands make more modest demands on soil moisture than do treelands. Hence, the former appear to be more suitable. Economically, treelands of Prosopis spicigera which have grown in harmony with the farm, the farmer, and the factors of locality are more productive of wealth. About 20 tree per acre coupled with afforestation of all available waste lands and creation of live hedges round all cultivated fields, would effectively immobilize shifting sand and provide fodder for goats. In addition, one of the greatest charges against grasslands is that in solving one problem of shifting sand, they create another of fire hazard. Therefore, judging from all aspects, treelands of Prosopis spicigera appear to constitute the best land use.