A Comparative Study on Plant Biodiversity of Oak (quercus Semecarpifolia Smith.) and Mixed Oak-deodar (cedrus Deodara D. Don.) forests in Central Himalayan Region of Uttarakhand
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2014/v140i4/48016Keywords:
Central Himalayan Region, Biodiversity, Oak, qurecus Semicarpifolia, Mixed Forest, Tree And Herb DensityAbstract
Present study concluded that the total plant species was greater in oak-deodar mixed forest in Central Himalayan region. This type of forest recorded more trees and shrubs whereas oak dominated forest constituted higher herbs. The tree and herb density was 1700 and 92000 respectively in oak dominated forest whereas shrub density was 2356 per ha. The A/F ratio of trees and shrubs was 0.363 and 1.39 in the mixed forest as compared to 0.023 and 0.89 in oak dominated forest. Further, A/F ratio of herbs was 1.45 in the latter to that of 0.6 in the former. The total cover (%) of shrubs was 5.23 and 6.18 whereas for herbs it was recorded as 13.46 and 10.29 in oak dominated and mixed oak-deodar forest respectively. The diversity of trees and shrubs was better in mixed oak-deodar forest whereas for herbs it was higher in oak dominated forest. The assessment of the plant biodiversity in different forests revealed that various disturbances do not provide time for the ecosystem recovery and widen the forest gap and fragmentation of the land in the region.References
Bond, W.J. (1994). Keystone species. In : Biodiversity and ecosystem function, (E.D. Schulzee and H.A. Mooney, Eds.), Springer, Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, p 237.
Dhar, U., Rawal, R.S. and Samant, S.S. (1997). Structural diversity and representatives of forest vegetation in a protected area of Kumaun Himalaya, India: implication for conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 6: 995- 1006.
Gaur, R.D. (1999). Flora of the District Garhwal North West Himalaya with Ethnobotanical Notes. Transmedia Publication, Srinagar, Garhwal,Uttaranchal.
Gupta, B. L. (1969). Forest flora of the Chakrata Dehradun and Saharanpur forest Divisions, Uttar Pradesh. 3rd edn, Manager of Publications,Delhi, 593pp.
Gurarni, D., Arya, N., Yadava, A. and Ram, J. (2010). Studies on plant biodiversity of pure Pinus roxburghii Sarg. forest and mixed pine-oak forest in Uttarakhand Himalaya. New York Sci. J., 3(8): 1-5.
Khan, M.S., Rahman, M.M. and Ali, M.A. (2001). Red Data Book of Vascular Plants of Bangladesh. Bangladesh National Herbarium, Dhaka.(Eds).179 pp.
Khera, N., Kumar, A., Ram, J. and Tewari, A. (2001). Plant biodiversity assessment in relation to disturbances in mid elevational forest of Central Himalaya, India. Tropical Ecology, 2: 83- 95.
Kumar, A. (2000). Plant biodiversity in forests of middle Central Himalaya in relation to various disturbances. Ph. D. thesis, Kumaun University, Nainital, Uttarakhand.
Kumar, A., Ram, J. and Tewari, A. (2001). Plant Biodiversity assessment in relation to disturbances in mid-elevational forest of Central Himalaya. India. Tropical Ecology, 42(1): 83-95.
Magurran, A.E. (1988). Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Prenceton University Press, New Jersey, USA.
Mishra, R. (1968). Ecology Work Book. Oxford and IBH Publishing Company, New Delhi.
Naithani, B.D. (1984). Flora of Chamoli, I and II. Botanical Survey of India, Howarh.
Negi, V. S., Maikhuri, R. and Rawat, L. S. (2011). Non-timber forest products (NTFPs): a viable option for biodiversity conservation and livelihood enhancement in central Himalaya. Biodiversity Conservation, 20:545–559.
Oliver, C.D. and Larson, B.C. (1990). Forest stands dynamics. McGraw Hill Inc. New York, USA.
Ralhan, P.K., Saxena, A.K. and Singh, J.S. (1982). Analysis of forest vegetation at and around Nainital in Kumaun Himalaya. Proceedings of Indian National Science Academy B, 48: 121-137.
Ram, J., Kumar, A. and Bhatt, J. (2004). Plant diversity in six forest types of Uttaranchal, Central Himalaya, India. Current Science, 86: 975-978.
Saxena, A.K. and Singh, J.S. (1982). A phytosoiological analysis of woody plant species in forest communities of a part of Kumaun Himalayas. Vegetation, 50: 3-22.
Saxena, A.K., Singh, S.P. and Singh, J.S. (1985). Population structure of forests of Kumaun Himalaya- implication for management. J. Environmental Management, 19: 307-324.
Semwal, S., Nautiyal, B.P. and Bhatt, A.B. (2008). Dominance diversity patterns and regeneration status of moist temperate forests in Garhwal, Part of the North-west Himalayas, India. Taiwan J. For. Sci., 23(4): 351-64.
Shannon, C.E. and Weiner, W. (1963). The Mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, USA, p 117.
Singh, J.S. and Singh, S.P. (1987). Forest vegetations of the Himalaya. Bot. Rev., 53:80-192.
Singh, J.S. and Singh, S.P. (1992). Forest of Himalaya-Structure and Functioning and Impact of man. Gynodya Prakashan, Nainital, India.
Singh, S.P., Adhikari, B.S. and Zobel, D.B. (1994). Biomass productivity, leaf longevity and forest structure in Central Himalaya. Eco. Monog,64: 401-421.
Sundriyal, M. and Sundriyal, R.C. (2003). Underutilized edible plants of the Sikkim Himalaya: need for domestication. Current Science,85(6):731–736.
Upreti, N., Tewari, J.C. and Singh, S.P. (1985). The oak forests of the Kumaun Himalaya (India) 1: Composition, diversity and regeneration. Mountain Research and Development, 5 (2): 163-174.
Whittaker, R.H. (1975). Communities and ecosystems. 2nd Ed. Macmillan Pub. Co., New York. 385 pp.
Wilson, S.D. and Tilman, D. (2002). Quadratic variation in old field species along gradient of disturbance and nitrogen. Ecology, 183: 492-504.
Downloads
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Unless otherwise stated, copyright or similar rights in all materials presented on the site, including graphical images, are owned by Indian Forester.
