Are Size, Distance and Location Responsible for Species Richness in Home Garden Agroforestry Systems?

Mohit Subba; Nazir A. Pala; Gopal Shukla; Sumit Chakarvarty

doi:10.36808/if/2017/v143i3/113626

Are Size, Distance and Location Responsible for Species Richness in Home Garden Agroforestry Systems?

Authors

Mohit Subba Department of Forestry, UBKV, Pundibari, Cooch Behar (West Bengal)
Nazir A. Pala Department of Forestry, UBKV, Pundibari, Cooch Behar (West Bengal)
Gopal Shukla Department of Forestry, UBKV, Pundibari, Cooch Behar (West Bengal)
Sumit Chakarvarty Department of Forestry, UBKV, Pundibari, Cooch Behar (West Bengal)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2017/v143i3/113626

Keywords:

Diversity, Terai, Distance, Small, Individual, Agroforestry System.

Abstract

The present study is a baseline survey of home gardens to explore the variation in species richness based on size, distance and location. The study site is terai zone in northern part of West Bengal covering three districts i, e. Jalpaiguri, part of Cooch Behar and Siliguri sub-division of Darjeeling district. A total of 100 home gardens were selected for the study. Among the sampled garden, 62 % were small (less than 0.5 ha), 26 % medium (0.5-1.0 ha) and only 12 % large (more than one ha). Similarly, 33%, 48% and 19 % of the total sampled gardens were located near, far and farthest from the main road of district or sub-division towns. A total of 55, 42 and 45 species were recorded from near, far and farthest category of home gardens, whereas 60, 38 and 44 number of species was recorded from small, medium and large home gardens, respectively.

References

Agbogidi O.M. and Adolor E.B. (2013). Home gardens in the maintenance of biological diversity. Applied Science Reports,1: 19-25.

Bajpai S., Sharma A.K. and Kanungo V.K. (2013). Traditional home gardens: a preserve of medicinal plants. International J. Herbal Medicine,1: 152-161.

Cromwell E., Cooper D. and Mulvany P. (1999).Agriculture, biodiversity and livelihoods: Issues and entry points for development agencies.

Overseas Development Institute, London. http://nt1.ids.ac.uk/eldis/agbio.htm

Fernandes E.C.M. and Nair P.K.R. (1986).An evaluation of the structure and function of tropical home gardens. Agricultural Systems, 21: 279-310.

Galluzzi G., Eyzaguirre P. and Negri V. (2010). Home gardens: neglected hotspots of agro-biodiversity and cultural diversity. Biodiversity Conservation,19: 3635-3654.

Hollingsworth P.M., Dawson I.K., Goodall-Copestake W.P., Richardson J.E., Weber J.C., Sotelo C. and Pennington R.T. (2005). Do farmers reduce genetic diversity when they domesticate tropical trees? A case study from Amazonia. Molecular Ecology,14: 497-501.

Jacobs V.J. and Alles W.S. (1987).Kandyan gardens in Sri Lanka. Agroforestry Systems, 5:123-137.

Kumar B.M. (2000). Ailanthus triphysa in the home gardens of Kerala, India: occurrence, basal area, average standing stock of wood and diameter structure. Indian J. Agroforestry,2: 49-52.

Kumar B.M. (2003). Home gardens as a livelihood security system in the tropics with special reference to Kerala. In: Agroforestry: potentials and opportunities, eds. Pathak, P. S. and Newaj, R. Agrobios, Jodhpur. Pp. 121-142.

Kumar B.M. (2005). Land use in Kerala: changing scenarios and shifting paradigms. J. Tropical Agriculture, 43: 1-12.

Kumar B.M. (2011). Species richness and above ground carbon stocks in the home gardens of central Kerala, India. Agricultural Ecosystem and Environment,140: 430-440.

Kumar B.M. and Nair P.K.R. (2004).The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agroforestry Systems,61: 135-152.

Lamont S. R., Eshbaugh W.H. and Greenberg A.H. (1999). Species composition, diversity and use of home gardens among three Amazonian villages. Economic Botany, 53: 312-326.

Lengkeek A.G., Mwangi A.M., Agufa C.A.C., Ahenda J.O. and Dawson I.K. (2006). Comparing genetic diversity in agroforestry systems with natural forest: a case of the important timber tree Vitex fischeri in central Kenya. Agroforestry Systems,67: 293-300.

Margalef R. (1958). Information theory in ecology. General Systems,3: 36-71.

Michon G., Bompard J., Hecketseiler P. and Ducatillion C. (1983). Tropical forest architectural analysis as applied to agroforests in the humid tropics: the example of traditional village agroforests in West Java. Agroforestry Systems,1: 117-129.

Miller A.J. and Schaal B.A. (2006). Domestication and distribution of genetic variation in wild and cultivated populations of the Mesoamerican fruit tree, Spondias purpurea L. (Anacardiaceae). Molecular Ecology, 15: 1467-1480

Nair P.K.R. (2008). Agroecosystem management in the 21^st century: it is time for a paradigm shift. J. Tropical Agriculture, 46: 1-12.

Padoch C. and de Jong W. (1991). The house gardens of Santa Rosa: diversity and variability in Amazonian agricultural systems. Economic Botany, 45: 166-175.

Panwar P. and Chakravarty S. (2010). Floristic structure and ecological function of homegardens in humid tropics of West Bengal, India. Indian J. Agroforestry, 12: 69-78.

Soemarwoto O. (1987). Homegardens: a traditional agroforestry system with a promising future. In: Agroforestry: A Decade of Development, eds. Steppler, H. A. and Nair, P. K. R. ICRAF, Nairobi Kenya. Pp. 157-172.

Trinh L.N., Watson J.W., Hue N.N., De N.N., Minh N.V., Chu P., Sthapit B.R. and Eyzaguirre P.B. (2003). Agrobiodiversity, conservation and development in Vietnamese homegardens. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 97: 317-344.

Van der Wal H. and Bongers F. (2013).Biosocial and bio-numerical diversity of variously sized homegardens in Tabasco, MÃ©xico. Agroforestry Systems, 87: 93-107.

Wezel A. and Ohl J. (2005). Does remoteness from urban centres influence plant diversity in homegardens and swidden fields: a case study from the Matsiguenka in the Amazonian rainforest of Peru? Agroforestry Systems, 65: 241-251.