Biomass and Carbon Stock Assessment in Agroforestry Practices: A Study in Southern Transition zone of Karnataka, India

Biomass and Carbon Stock Assessment in Agroforestry Practices: A Study in Southern Transition zone of Karnataka, India

Authors

  •   Mitali Mehta   ICFRE-Rain Forest Research Institute, Jorhat, Assam
  •   G. M. Devagiri   University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga, Karnataka
  •   B. N. Satish   University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga, Karnataka
  •   B. G. Nayak   University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga, Karnataka
  •   D. Ravikumar   University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga, Karnataka
  •   Ankush Moran   ICFRE-Himalayan Forest Research Institute, Panthaghati, Shimla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2025/v151i6/170616

Keywords:

Agroforestry, Biomass, Carbon sequestration, Soil carbon and Climate change.

Abstract

Agroforestry plays an important role in global carbon cycle and regulating the earth's climate. The present study was conducted with the objective to know about the carbon sequestration potential of different agroforestry practices in Periyapatana and Hunsur tehsils of Mysore district, Karnataka. Based on the reconnaissance survey four prominent practices viz; multipurpose trees (MPT's) on farmlands, block plantations, boundary plantations and control (i.e. agricultural crop without trees) were selected for the present study. Among the four practices, highest biomass, biomass carbon, soil organic carbon stock, total carbon was recorded in block plantations whereas lowest was recorded in control. Total biomass and biomass carbon varied from 3.92 Mg ha-1 to 63.39 Mg ha-1, 1.84 Mg ha-1 to 29.79 Mg ha-1, respectively. The SOC stock ranged from 13.14 to 22.05 Mg ha-1. Total carbon stock across the different practices ranged from 14.98 Mg ha-1 to 51.84 Mg ha-1. Thus, the study highlights the need for policies that promote agroforestry adoption through incentives, technical assistance and integration into national carbon offset programs, thereby reinforcing its potential as a nature-based solution for environmental sustainability and rural livelihoods.

References

Ajay K.L. and Singh P.P. (2003). Economic worth of carbon stored in above ground biomass of India's forest. Indian Forester, 129(7): 874–880.doi: 10.36808/if/2003/v129i7/2354

Ajit, Dhyani S.K., Handa A.K., Newaj R., Chavan S.B., Alam B., Prasad R., Ram A., Rizvi R.H., Jain A.K., Uma, Tripathi D., Shakhela R.R., Patel A.G., Dalvi V.V., Saxena A.K., Parihar A.K.S., Backiyavathy M.R., Sudhagar R.J. and Gunasekaran S. (2016). Estimating carbon sequestration potential of existing agroforestry systems in India. Agroforestry Systems, 91(6): 1101–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9986-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9986-z

Baritz R., Seufert G., Montanarella L. and Van Ranst E. (2010). Carbon concentrations and stocks in forest soils of Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 260(3): 262–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.03.025

Chauhan S.K., Sharma R., Singh B. and Sharma S.C. (2015). Biomass production, carbon sequestration and economics of on-farm poplar plantations in Punjab, India. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 7(1): 452–458. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v7i1.631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v7i1.631

Chavan S.B., Dhillon R.S., Sirohi C., Uthappa A.R., Jinger D., Jatav H.S., Chichaghare A.R., Kakade V., Paramesh V., Kumari S., Yadav DK., Minkina T. and Rajput V.D. (2023). Carbon Sequestration Potential of Commercial Agroforestry Systems in Indo-Gangetic Plains of India: Poplar and Eucalyptus-Based Agroforestry Systems. Forests, 14(3): 559. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14030559 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f14030559

Chiemela S.N., Noulekoun F., Chiemela C.J., Zenebe A., Abadi N. and Birhane E. (2018). Conversion of degraded agricultural landscapes to a smallholder agroforestry system and carbon sequestration in drylands. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 10(3): 472–487. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijccsm-08-2015-0116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-08-2015-0116

Dhillon G.S. and Van Rees K.C. (2017). Soil organic carbon sequestration by shelterbelt agroforestry systems in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjss-2016-0094 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjss-2016-0094

Dhyani S.K., Newaj R. and Sharma A.P. (2009). Agroforestry: its relation with agronomy, challenges and opportunities. Indian J. Agron., 54: 249–266.

FRI (1996). Indian woods. Forest Research Institute, Dehradun, p. 185.

Goswami S., Verma K. and Kaushal R. (2014). Biomass and carbon sequestration in different agroforestry systems of a Western Himalayan watershed. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture, 30(2): 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2013.855990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2013.855990

Gupta M.K. (2012). Carbon Sequestration: Estimation of soil organic carbon pool in agroforestry Land Use in Uttarakhand State. Forestry Bulletin, 12(2): 17–20.

IPCC (2000). Land Use, Land–Use Change and Forestry; – A special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Cambridge University Press, The Edinburgh Building, UK. p. 388.

IPCC (2018). Summary for Policymakers. In: Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre–industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, p. 32.

IPCC (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 35-115, doi: 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647

Kirby K.R. and Potvin C. (2007). Variation in carbon storage among tree species: implications for the management of a small-scale carbon sink project. For. Ecol. Manag., 246: 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.072

Koul D.N., Shukla G., Panwar P. and Chakravarty S. (2011). Status of soil carbon sequestration under different land use systems in Terai Zone of West Bengal. Environment and We an International Journal of Science and Technology, 6: 95–100.

Mey C.B.J. and Gore M.L. (2021). Biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems of the Mbalmayo Forest Reserve. Journal of Forest and Environmental Science, 37(2): 91–103. doi:10.7747/ JFES.2021.37.2.91

Mosquera–Losada M.R., Freese D., Rigueiro–Rodriguez A., Kumar B.M. and Nair P.K.R. (2011). Carbon Sequestration in European Agroforestry Systems. Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems: Opportunities and Challenges, 8: 43–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1630-8_3

Nair P.K.R., Nair V.D., Kumar B.M. and Showalter J.M. (2010). Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Adv Agron, 108: 237–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(10)08005-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(10)08005-3

Nath P.C., Thangjam U., Kalita S.S., Sahoo U.K., Giri K. and Nath A.J. (2022). Tree diversity and carbon important species vary with traditional agroforestry managers in the Indian eastern Himalayan region. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(43): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20329-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20329-4

Oelbermann M., Voroney P. and Gordon A. (2004). Carbon sequestration in tropical and temperate agroforestry systems: a review with examples from Costa Rica and southern Canada. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 104(3): 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.04.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.04.001

Parmar B., Vishwakarma A., Padbhushan R., Kumar A., Kumar R., Kumari R., Yadav, B.K., Giri S.P., Kaviraj M. and Kumar U. (2022). Hedge and Alder-Based Agroforestry Systems: Potential Interventions to Carbon Sequestration and Better Crop Productivity in Indian Sub-Himalayas. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.858948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.858948

Rahangdale C.P. and Pathak N.N. (2016). Dynamics of Organic Carbon Stock in Soil under Agroforestry System. Trends in Bioscience, 9(11): 662–667.

Sharma H., Pant K., Bishist R., Gautam K.L., Ludarmani, Dogra R., Kumar M. and Kumar A. (2023). Estimation of biomass and carbon storage potential in agroforestry systems of north western Himalayas, India. CATENA, 225: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107009

Sharma P., Bhardwaj D.R., Singh M.K. and Nigam N. (2022). Geospatial technology in agroforestry: status, prospects, and constraints. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 30(55): 1-17 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20305-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20305-y

Shukla P.R., Garg A. and Kapshe M. (2003). Greenhouse gas emissions scenarios. In Climate Change and India: Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation. Universities Press (India) Pvt Ltd, Hyderabad, pp. 128–158.

Tebkew M., Asfaw Z. and Worku A. (2024). The role of agroforestry systems for addressing climate change livelihood vulnerability of farmers of Northwestern Ethiopia. Heliyon, 10(17): 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36196

Tomlinson H., Teklehaimanot Z., Traore A. and Olapade E. (1995). Soil amelioration and root symbioses of Parkia biglobosa (Jacq.) Benth. in West Africa. Agroforestry Systems, 30: 145–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0681-0_7

UNFCCC (1997). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. p.1–10. (doi: http://www.unfcc.de/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.html).

Verma K., Sharma P., Bhardwaj D. R., Sharma V. and Thakur, P. (2024). Towards a Greener Future: Scaling Up Agroforestry for Global Sustainability. Green and Low-Carbon Economy, 20: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewGLCE42022481 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewGLCE42022481

Walkley A. and Black I.A. (1934). An examination of the digestion method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37(1): 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003

Yadav R.P., Bisht J.K. and Bhatt J.C. (2017). Biomass, carbon stock under different production systems in the mid hills of Indian Himalaya. Tropical Ecology, 58(1): 15–21.

Yadav R.P. and Bisht J.K. (2014). Agroforestry to combat climate change. Kheti, 66: 11–14.

Zandalinas S.I., Fritschi F.B. and Mittler R. (2021). Global warming, climate change and environmental pollution: recipe for a multifactorial stress combination disaster. Trends in plant Science, 26(6): 588–599.doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.02.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2021.02.011

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2025-07-22

How to Cite

Mehta, M., Devagiri, G. M., Satish, B. N., Nayak, B. G., Ravikumar, D., & Moran, A. (2025). Biomass and Carbon Stock Assessment in Agroforestry Practices: A Study in Southern Transition zone of Karnataka, India. Indian Forester, 151(6), 540‐545. https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2025/v151i6/170616

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...