Recreational Demand for Kovai Kutralam Ecotourism Centre:A Travel Cost Method

Recreational Demand for Kovai Kutralam Ecotourism Centre:A Travel Cost Method

Authors

  •   Varadha Raj   Department of Agriculture Economics, TNAU, Coimbatore-3 (Tamil Nadu)
  •   C. D. Kavigeetha   Department of Agriculture Economics, TNAU, Coimbatore-3 (Tamil Nadu)
  •   K. R. Ashok   Department of Agriculture Economics, TNAU, Coimbatore-3 (Tamil Nadu)
  •   M. Chinnadurai   Department of Agriculture Economics, TNAU, Coimbatore-3 (Tamil Nadu)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2017/v143i11/119703

Keywords:

Ecotourism, Recreational Demand, Travel Cost Method, Consumer Surplus.

Abstract

Kovai Kutralam Ecotourism Centre (KKE) provides economic prosperity, ecological stability and social equity in the tribal area. The aim of the study was to measure the recreational value of the KKEC. Nearly 53 per cent of the visitors were 22 to 45 years age group with average annual household income of ` 3.75 Lakh and coming from 51.81 km range at the rate of 1.91 times in a year. About 52 per cent of ecotourists visited mainly for recreational purpose. The recreational demand of the KKEC was estimated by Travel Cost Method (TCM). The total travel cost and distance were negatively significant and education was positively significant. The value of individual consumer surplus per visit was about ` 215 and total consumer surplus of the KKEC was ` 7.52 crore per year which captured the recreational value of the site. Hence, an existing entry fee may also be hiked from ` 50 to 100 for an adult and ` 75 for a non-adult per trip to maximize the profit and further investment in the KKEC.

References

Aznor A.Siti. {2009). Visitors Willingness to Payforan Entrance Fee: ACase Study of Marine Parks in Malaysia.Unversty of Leeds,UK, pp: 289.

Bateman I.J. (1993). Valuation of the Environment, Methods and Techniques: Revealed Preferences Methods, Sustainable Environmental Economics and Management, Bellhaven Press, London, pp: 194-265.

Bekkay E. Mohammed, Abedellatif Moukrim and Facial Benchakroun (2013). An Economic Assessment of the Ramsar Site of Massa (Morocco) with Travel Costand Contingent Valuation Methods, A/ricon 7. Environmental Science and Techno/ogy, 7(6); 441-447.

Bell F. and. Leeworthy V. R. (1990). Recreational Demand by Tourists for Salt Water Beach Days, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18:189-205.

Buren, Von., M.S., Linder R.K. and Me. Leod.(1996).Towards an Analytical Frameworkfor Resource Allocation in Fisheries with Multiple Users, Paper Presented to the 4 (f Annual Conference ofthe Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, Melbourne.

Christ C., Hillel 0., Matus S. and Sweeting, J. (2003). Tourism and Biodiversity: Mapping Tourism's Global Footprint, United llations Environment Programme (UNEP) and International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN),Washington, DC.

Connel (1992). An Economic Evaluation of National Parks, Monograph, Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, Canberra.

Englin J. and Shonakwiler J.S. (1995). Modeling Recreation Demand in the Presence of Unobservable Travel Cost: Towards ATravel Price Model, J. Environmental Economics and Management, 17:213-229.

Enviado [2010). Life as Commerce-Ecotourism as a Market Based Mechanism-A Case Study, Fecha De Publication.

Garrod G. and Willis K.G. (1999). Economic Valuation of the Environment, Edward Elgar Publishing Inc, Northampton Massachusetts.

Griffiths M.R. and Southey C. (1995). The Opportunity Cost of Biodiversity Conservation in Kenya, Ecological Economics, 12:125-139.

Gurluk S. and Rehber E. (2008). ATravel Cost Study to Estimate Recreational Valuefor A Bird Refuge at Lake Manyas, Turkey, 7. Environmental Management, 88:1350-1360.

Heyes C.L.and HeyesA. (1999). Recreational Benefits from the Dartmoor National Park, Journal of Environmental Management,55:69-80.

Honey M. (2006). Foreword in Le Guide Des Destinations Indigenes, Indigene Editions, France, Montpellier.

Ross S. and Walls G. (1999). Ecotourism towards Congruence between Theory and Practice, Tourism Management,20(1): 123-132.

Sohngen B. (2000). The Value of Day Trips to Lake Erie Beaches, Unpublished Report, Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics, Ohio State University.

Timah P. (2011). Non-Market Valuation of Beach Recreation using the Travel Cost Method in the Context of Developing World: An Application to Visitors ofthe Naoe Beach in Kribi. Cameroon, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, pp: 88-89.

Willis K.G and Garrod G. (1991). An Individual Travel Cost Method of Evaluating Forest Recreaton, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 42 (1): 33-42.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2017-11-01

How to Cite

Raj, V., Kavigeetha, C. D., Ashok, K. R., & Chinnadurai, M. (2017). Recreational Demand for Kovai Kutralam Ecotourism Centre:A Travel Cost Method. Indian Forester, 143(11), 1177–1182. https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2017/v143i11/119703
Loading...