Assessment of Biomass Storage, Net Accumulation and Carbon Sequestration in Chir-Pine (Pinus roxburghii Sarg.) Dominated Community Forests of Kumaun Himalaya in relation to Climate Change
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2021/v147i7/155640Keywords:
Biomass, Carbon Sequestration, Pinus roxburghii, Tree Density, Van Panchayat.Abstract
The present study deals with the vegetation analysis, biomass storage and carbon sequestration at three different aspects of Van Panchayat (Community) forest sites around Nainital district of Kumaun Himalayas. All three aspects, viz; south-east (SE), east (E) and south (S) of Van Panchayat forests are dominated by Pinus roxburghii Sarg. The density of trees across all aspects of community forests varied from 450 to 670 individuals ha-1. The basal area values reported varied from 31.16 to 56.32 m2ha-1. The species diversity across aspects ranged from 0.440 to 1.389, 1.656 to 2.319 and 1.962 to 3.152 for trees, shrubs and herbs, respectively. Total biomass storage values of trees across all aspects ranged from 155.83 to 333.77 t ha-1. Net biomass accumulation by trees was 10.53 t ha-1 yr-1 on SE aspect (Chir-Pine forest), 8.05 t ha-1 yr-1 on E aspect (Chir Pine forest) and 7.96 t ha-1 yr-1 on S aspect (Chir-Pine forest). Net annual carbon sequestration of trees varied between 3.54 and 4.36 t C ha-1 yr-1 . The density, biomass storage, net annual biomass accumulation as well as carbon sequestration values reported are higher on SE aspect. It can be predicted that South-East aspect (mixed aspect) plays a significant role in forest growth and maturity as compared to East and South (singal) aspects. In general, strong rules and regulations and effective enforcement must have minimized degradation and deforestation of forests in this Van Panchyat. This will certainly help in increasing forest cover and reducing carbon emission which will lead to minimise rise in CO2 level of the atmosphere.References
Adhikari B.S., Dhaila-Adhikari S. and Rawat Y.S. (1998). Structure of Himalayan moist temperate cypress forest at and around Naini Tal, Kumaun Himalayas. Oecologia Montana, 7(1–2): 21–31.
Adhikari B.S., Rawat Y.S. and Singh S.P. (1995). Structure and function of high altitude forests of central Himalaya I. Dry matter dynamics. Annals of Botany. Oxford University Press, 75(3): 237–248.
Arnold J.E.M. and Stewart W.C. (1991). Common property resource management in India. Oxford Forestry Institute, University of Oxford.
Banskota K., Karky B. and Skutsch M. (2007). Reducing carbon emissions through community-managed forests in the Himalaya. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD).
Bohra C.S., Jina B.S. and Lodhiyal L.S. (2011). Estimation of total carbon stockpile and sequestration rates in degraded and non-degraded sites of oak and pine forests of Kumaun Central Himalaya. Indian Forester. Indian Forester, 137(1): 66–70.
Chaturvedi O.P. and Singh J.S. (1987a). A quantitative study of the forest floor biomass, litter fall and nutrient return in a Pinus roxburghii forest in Kumaun Himalaya. Vegetatio. Springer, 71(2): 97–106.
Chaturvedi O.P. and Singh J.S. (1987b). The structure and function of pine forest in Central Himalaya. I. Dry matter dynamics. Annals of Botany. Oxford University Press, 60(3): 237–252.
Curtis J.T. (1959). The vegetation of Wisconsin: an ordination of plant communities. University of Wisconsin Press. Defries R.S., Hansen , Townshend Janetos ,
Loveland (2000). A new global 1-km dataset of percentage tree cover derived from remote sensing Global Change Biology. Wiley Online Library, 6(2): 247–254.
Gwal P., Lodhiyal N., Rawat Y.S. and Adhikari B. (2016). Vegetational analysis, carbon stock and regeneration potential of Myrica esculenta at different forest sites around Nainital', Current World Environment. Enviro Research Publishers, 11(3): 784.
Gwal P., Lodhiyal N. and Rawat Y.S. (2019). Biomass and Carbon Storage Potential of Oak - Pine forests in Kumaun Himalaya, India. Indian Journal of Forestry. 42(3): 251-254.
Houghton R.A. (2005). Above ground forest biomass and the global carbon balance. Global change biology. Wiley Online Library, 11(6): 945–958.
Jina B.S. Sah P., Bhatt M.D. and Rawat Y.S. (2008). Estimating carbon sequestration rates and total carbon stockpile in degraded and non-degraded sites of Oak and Pine forest of Kumaun Central Himalaya. Ecoprint: An International Journal of Ecology, 15: 75–81.
Lodhiyal L.S., Lodhiyal N. and Bhakuni N. (2014). Standing tree biomass and carbon content in natural forests of Kumaun in central Himalaya. Journal of plant development Science, 6(2): 167–174.
Lodhiyal N. and Lodhiyal L.S. (2012). Tree layer composition and carbon content of oak and pine in Lohaghat forests of Kumaun Himalaya. Journal of plant development Science, 4(1): 55–62.
Magnussen S. and Reed D. (2004). Modelling for estimation and monitoring (FAO-IUFRO, 2004).
Misra R. (1968). Ecology Work Book. Oxford and IBH Publishing Calcutta, pp.244.
Ralhan P.K., R.K. Khanna, S.P. Singh and J.S. Singh (1985). Phenological characteristics of the tree layer of Kumaun Himalayan forests', Vegetatio. Springer, 60(2): 91–101.
Ram J., Kumar A. and Bhatt J. (2004). Plant diversity in six forest types of Uttaranchal, Central Himalaya, India. Current science. JSTOR, pp. 975–978.
Rana B.S., Singh S.P. and Singh R.P. (1988). Biomass and productivity of Chir pine (Pinus rosburghil Sarg.) forest in central Himalaya. Proc. Ind. Nat. Acad, 54: 71–74.
Rana B.S., Singh S.P. and Singh R.P. (1989). Biomass and net primary productivity in Central Himalayan forests along an altitudinal gradient. Forest Ecology and Management. Elsevier, 27(3–4): 199–218.
Rao P.B. and Singh S.P. (1989). Effect of shade on Central Himalayan species from a successional gradient. Acta oecologica. Oecologia plantarum, 10(1): 21–33.
Rawal R.S. and Pangtey Y.P.S. (1994). High Altitude Forest in a Part of Kumaun in Central Himalaya: Analysis along Altitudinal Gradient', Proceedings-Indian National Science Academy Part B. Indian National Science Academy, 60: 557–564.
Rawat Y.S. and Singh J.S. (1988). Structure and function of oak forests in central Himalaya. I. Dry matter dynamics', Annals of Botany. Oxford University Press, 62(4): 397–411.
Saxena A.K. and Singh J.S. (1982). A phytosociological analysis of woody species in forest communities of a part of Kumaun Himalaya', Vegetatio. Springer, 50(1): 3–22.
Semwal R.L., Bisht R.S. and Pushkin Phartiyal (2012). Community forestry in the Indian Himalayan Region. Pp. 2540. In: Glimpses of Forestry Research in Indian Himalayan region. Eds. G.C.S. Negi and P.P. Dhyani, Bishen Singh Mehendra Pal singh, 23-A, New Connaught Place, Dehradun. 184 pp.
Shannon C.E. and Weiner W. (1963). The mathematical theory of communication Urban University Illinois Press. 125pp.
Singh J.S. and Singh S.P. (1992). Forests of Himalaya: Structure, functioning and impact of man.', Gyanodaya Prakashan. 294pp.
Tripathi B.C., Rikhari H., Bargali S.S and Rawat, Y.S. (1991). Species Composition and Regeneration in Disturbed Forest Sites in the Oak zone in and around Nainital. Proc. Indian natn. Sci. Acad. B57 No, 6: 381–390.
Troup R.S. (1921). The silviculture of Indian trees. Vol. III. Clarendon'. Oxford.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Unless otherwise stated, copyright or similar rights in all materials presented on the site, including graphical images, are owned by Indian Forester.
