Estimation of Biomass Storage and Net Primary Productivity of Five Dominant Forests of Kumaun Himalaya along the Altitudinal Gradient
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2023/v149i3/167547Keywords:
Altitude, Biomass, Net Primary Productivity, Kumaun Himalaya.Abstract
The present study was performed in the forest of Kumaun Himalaya present along the altitude as to determine the biomass storage and NPP of the forests. For this purpose, a total of 150 plots were placed at 15 different sites by following plot sampling method. Allometric regression equations were used for the calculation of tree biomass and NPP, which were previously developed for the similar forests and similar tree species of Himalaya by different workers. The biomass value of all the five forests ranged from 156-918.36 t ha-1 and NPP varied between 10.70 and 20.30 t ha-1 yr-1. Low biomass value was reported at middle altitude (chir-pine and banj-oak forest) and lowest altitude (teak forest) as compared to the high altitude forests. However, all the forests showed high net primary productivity. The regression analysis showed a positive correlation of biomass with NPP (r2 =0.595). No relationship was seen between altitude and biomass and altitude and net primary productivity. In fact the entire elevation range supports good productivity and biomass. It was also noticed that expansion of chir-pine forests towards the banj-oak forest was responsible for the low biomass of banj-oak forests. Banj-oak forests at this elevation are considered to be the soil binder forests which bind the soil and stop landslides. However the chir-pine expansion in banj-oak forest area is facing tremendous loss in its forest vegetation.References
Adhikari B.S., Rawat Y.S. and Singh S.P. (1995). Structure and function of high altitude forests of Central Himalaya, I: dry matter dynamics. Annals of Botany, 75: 237-248.
Ainsworth E.A. and Rogers A. (2007). The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising CO2: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant, Cell and Environment, 30: 258–270.
Alves L.F., Vieira S.A., Scaranello M.A., Camargo P.B., Santos F.A., Joly C.A. and Martinelli L.A. (2010). Forest structure and live aboveground biomass variation along an elevational gradient of tropical Atlantic moist forest (Brazil). Forest Ecology and Management, 260(5): 679-691.
Barthelemy Y., Patrice S., Salifou T., Jeanne M.R. and Victor H. (2015). Floristic diversity of Piliostigma asssociations in relation to latitudinal gradient, soil and climate variables in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Tropical Ecology, 56(1): 57-76.
Bullock J.A. (1981). In: Dynamic properties of forest ecosystems. (D.E. Reichle eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London, New York and Melbourne.
Castañeda-Moya E., Twilley R.R. and Rivera-Monroy V.H. (2013). Allocation of biomass and net primary productivity of mangrove forests along environmental gradients in the Florida Coastal Everglades, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 307: 226–241.
Champion H.G. and Seth S.K. (1968). A Revised Survey of the forest types of India. Manager Publication Delhi.
Chaturvedi O.P. and Singh J.S. (1982). Total biomass and biomass production of Pinus roxburghii trees growing in allaged natural forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 12(3): 632-640.
Chaturvedi O.P. and Singh J.S. (1987). The structure and function of pine forest in Central Himalaya. I. Dry matter dynamics. Annals of Botany, 60: 237-252.
Currie D.J. and Francis A.P. (2004). Regional versus climate effect on taxon richness in angiosperms: reply to Qian and Ricklefs. American Naturalist, 163: 780–785.
Dar J.A. and Sundarapandian S. (2015). Variation of biomass and carbon pools with forest type in temperate forests of Kashmir Himalaya, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(2): 1-17.
Dombois M.D. and Ellenberg H. (1974). Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John-Wiley and Sons, New York. 547 p.
Fauzi N., Hambali K., Nawawi S.A., Busu I. and Yew S.K. (2017). Biomass and carbon stock estimation along different altitudinal gradients in tropical forest of Gunung Basor, Kelantan, Malaysia. Malayan Nature Journal, 69(1): 57–62.
Gairola S., Sharma C.M., Ghildiyal S.K. and Suyal S. (2014). Live tree biomass and carbon variation along an altitudinal gradient in moist temperate valley slopes of the Garhwal Himalaya (India). Current Science, 100(12): 1862-1870.
Gairola S., Sharma C.M., Suyal S. and Ghildiyal S.K. (2011). Species Composition and Diversity in Mid-altitudinal Moist Temperate Forests of the Western Himalaya. Journal of Forest Science, 27(1): 1-15.
Garkoti S.C. (2008). Estimates of biomass and primary productivity in a high-altitude maple forest of the west central Himalayas. Ecological Research, 23(1): 41–49.
Givnish T.J. (1999). On the causes of gradients in tropical tree diversity. Journal of Ecology, 87(2): 193-210.
Golley F.B., McGinnis J.T., Clements R.G., Child G.I. and Duever M.J. (1975). Mineral cycling in a tropical moist forest ecosystem. Univ. Georgia Press Athens. 248p.
Gong H., Cui Q. and Gao J. (2020). Latitudinal, soil and climate effects on key leaf traits in northeastern China. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22: e00904.
House J.I., Archer S., Breshears D.D. and Scholes R.J. (2003). Conundrums in mixed woody–herbaceous plant systems. Journal of Biogeography, 30: 1763–1777.
Javaid M. and Zafar A.R. (2015). Influence of environmental and anthropogenic factors on the species distribution in alpine rangelands of Gurez valley, Kashmir, India. Tropical Ecology, 56: 335–346.
Jha K.K. (1995). Structure and functioning of an age series of Teak (Tectona grandis Linn.) plantations in Kumaun Himalayan Tarai. Ph.D. thesis. Kumaun University, Nainital, 151 pp
Jiang Y. and Wang L. (2017). Pattern and control of biomass allocation across global forest ecosystems. Ecology and Evolution, 7(14):5493–5501.
Jina B.S. (2006). Monitoring and estimating carbon sequestration in Oak and Pine forests of varying level of disturbances in Kumaun Central Himalaya. Ph.D. thesis, Kumaun University, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India: Department of Botany.
Johnson F.L. and Risser P.G. (1974). Biomass, annual net primary production and dynamics of six mineral elements in a post oak-blackjack oak forest. Ecology, 55: 1246-1258.
Jordon C.F. (1971). Productivity of tropical forests and its relation to a world pattern of energy storage. The Journal of Ecology, 127-142.
Joshi N.R., Tewari A. and Chand D.B. (2013). Impact of forest fire and aspect on phytosociology, tree biomass and carbon stock in Oak and Pine mixed Forests of Kumaun central Himalaya, India. Researcher, 5(3): 1–8.
Kalela E.K. (1954). Mäntysiemenpuiden ja-puustojen juurisuhteista. Acta Forest Fenn., 61: 1-16.
Kira T., Ogawa H., Yoda K. and Ogino K. (1967). Comparative ecological studies on three main types of forest vegetation in Thailand. IV. Dry matter production with special reference to the Khao Chong rain forest. Nature and Life in South East Asia, 6: 149–174.
Klinge H. and Rodrigues W. (1968). Litter production in an area of Amazonian terra firme forest. Part II. Mineral nutrient content of the litter. Amazoniana: Limnologia et Oecologia Regionalis Systematis Fluminis. Amazonas, 1(4): 303-310.
Korner C. (2000). Why are there global gradients in species richness? Mountains might hold the answer. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15: 513–514.
Kumar J.I.N., Sajish P.R., Kumar R.N. and Patel K. (2011). Biomass and Net Primary Productivity in three different Aged Butea Forest Ecosystems in Western India, Rajasthan. Our Nature, 9: 73-82.
Liu L.B., Yang H.M., Xu Y., Guo Y.M. and Ni J. (2016). Forest biomass and net primary productivity in southwestern China: A meta-analysis focusing on environmental driving factors. Forests, 7(8): 173.
Lomolino M.V. (2001). Elevation gradients of species-density: historical and prospective views. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10(1): 3–13.
Lukac M., Calfapietra C., Lagomarsino A. and Loreto F. (2010). Global climate change and tree nutrition: effects of elevated CO2 and temperature. Tree Physiology, 30: 1209–1220.
Manish K., Pandit M.K. and Telwala Y. (2017). Elevational plant species richness patterns and their drivers across non-endemics, endemics and growth forms in the Eastern Himalaya. Journal of Plant Research, 130: 829–844.
Misra R. (1968). Ecology workbook, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Calcutta, 224p.
Morin X., Fahse L., Jactel H., Scherer-Lorenzen M., GarcÃa-Valdés R. and Bugmann H. (2018). Long-term response of forest productivity to climate change is mostly driven by change in tree species composition. Scientific Reports, 8(1): 1–12.
Muller D. and Nielsen J. (1965). Production brute, pertes par respiration et production nette dans la for6t ombrophile tropicale. Det forstl. Forsogsv. i Danmark, 29: 69-160.
Ogino K. (1977). Abeech forest in Asia: biomass, its enrichment and net production. In: Shidei T. and Kira T. (Eds.), Primary Productivity of Terrestrial Communities. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, Japan, 172-186.
Ohsawa M. (1995). Latitudinal comparison of altitudinal changes in forest structure, leaf-type, and species richness in humid monsoon Asia. Vegetation, 121: 3–10.
Orlov A.J. (1968). Development and life duration of pine feeding roots. Methods of productivity studies in root systems and rhizosphere organisms. Leningrad, USSR: Nauka Publishing House, USSR Academy of Science, NAUKA, 130-140.
Phillips E.A. (1959). Method of Vegetation Study: Holt Rinehart and Winston, Inc. New York, U.S.A.107.
Rana B.S., Singh S.P. and Singh R.P. (1989). Biomass and net primary productivity in Central Himalayan forest along an altitudinal gradient. Forest Ecology and Management, 27: 199–218.
Rawat B., Gaira K.S., Gairola S., Tewari L.M. and Rawal R.S. (2021). Spatial prediction of plant species richness and density in high-altitude forests of Indian west Himalaya. Trees, Forests and People, 6: 1-10. doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100132.
Rawat B., Gairola S., Sekar K.C. and Rawal R.S. (2014). Community structure, regeneration potential and future dynamics of natural forest site in part of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, Uttarakhand, India. African Journal of Plant Science, 8(7): 380–391.
Rawat B. and Rawal R.S. (2019). Ecological value and change sensitivity based approach for defining integrity of forests in west Himalaya, India. In: Garkoti, S. (Ed.), Tropical Ecosystems: Structure, Functions and Challenges in the Face of Global Change. Springer Nature, India, pp. 247–261.
Rawat Y.S. and Singh J.S. (1988). The structure and function of oak forests in Central Himalaya II. Nutrient dynamics. Annals of Botany, 62: 413-427.
Rodin L.E. and Bazilevich N.I. (1967). Production and mineral cycling terrestrial vegetation (English translation by G.E. Fogg). Edinburg. Oliver and Boyd. 258 p.
Sagar R., Raghubansi A.S. and Singh J.S. (2003). Tree species composition, dispersion and diversity along a disturbance gradient in a dry tropical forest region of India. Forest Ecology and Management, 186: 61–71.
Saxena A.K. and Singh J.S. (1982). A phytosociological analysis of woody species in forest communities of a part of Kumaun Himalaya. Vegetation, 50: 3-22.
Saxena A.K. and Singh J.S. (1984). Tree population structure of certain Himalayan forest associations and implications concerning their future composition. Vegetation, 58(2): 61–69.
Sharma C.M., Baduni N.P., Gairola S., Ghildiyal S.K. and Suyal S. (2010). Effects of slope aspects on forest compositions, community structures and soil properties in natural temperate forests of Garhwal Himalaya. Journal of Forestry Research, 21(3): 331-337.
Singh J.S. (2006). Sustainable development of Indian Himalayan region: Linking ecological and economic concerns. Current Science, 90(6): 784-788.
Singh J.S., Rawat Y.S. and Chaturvedi O.P. (1984). Replacement of oak forest with pine in the Himalaya affects nitrogen cycle. Nature, 311: 54–56.
Singh J.S. and Singh S.P. (1992). Forest if Himalaya: Structure, Functioning and Impact of man. Gynodaya Prakashan, Nainital, India.
Singh S.P. and Singh J.S. (1989). Ecology of central Himalayan forest with special reference to sal forest ecosystem. Perspectives in Ecology. New Delhi: Jagamander Book Agency 193-232.
Singh R.P. (1979). Primary production and energy dynamics of tropical dry deciduous forest in Chandraprabha region, Varanasi. Ph.D. Thesis, Banaras Hindu University, India. 198p.
Subedi C.K., Rokaya M.B., Münzbergová Z., Timsina B., Gurung J. and Chettri N. (2020). Vascular plant diversity along an elevational gradient in the Central Himalayas, western Nepal. Folia Geobotanica, 55(2): 127-140.
Thokchom A. and Yadava P.S. (2017). Biomass and carbon stock along an altitudinal gradient in the forest of Manipur, Northeast India. Tropical Ecology, 58(2): 389-396.
Valdiya K.S. (1980). Geology of Kumaun Lesser Himalaya. Wadia institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun, 291 p.
Van Do. T., Sato T., Dai Hai, V., Thang N.T., Binh N.T., Son N.H., VAN CAM and NGO (2017). Aboveground biomass and tree species diversity along altitudinal gradient in Central Highland, Vietnam. Tropical Ecology, 58(1).
Vazquez G.J.A. and Givnish T.G. (1998). Altitudinal gradients in tropical forest composition, structure, and diversity in the Sierra de Manantlán. Journal of Ecology, 86: 999–1020.
Wang B., Li M., Fan W., Yu Y. and Chen J.M. (2018). Relationship between net primary productivity and forest stand age under different site conditions and its implications for regional carbon cycle study. Forests, 9(1): 0–5.
Whittaker R.H. (1975). Communities and ecosystems.2nd ed. Macmillan Pub.Co., New York; 385 pp.
Whittaker R.H. (1966). Forest dimensions and production in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecology, 47(1): 103-121.
Zha T.S., Barr A.G., Bernier P.Y., Lavigne M.B., Trofymow J.A., Amiro B.D., et al. (2013). Gross and aboveground net primary production at Canadian forest carbon flux sites. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 174: 54–64.
Zobel D.B. and Singh S.P. (1997). Himalayan forests and ecological generalizations. BioScience, 47(11): 735-74.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Unless otherwise stated, copyright or similar rights in all materials presented on the site, including graphical images, are owned by Indian Forester.
