Growth and Productivity of <i>Melia azedarach</i> Plantation under Different levels of Nutrients

Baljit Singh; R. I. S. `Gill; Navneet Kaur

doi:10.36808/if/2025/v151i11/170825

Growth and Productivity of Melia azedarach Plantation under Different levels of Nutrients

Authors

Baljit Singh Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana – 141 004
R. I. S. `Gill Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana – 141 004
Navneet Kaur Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana – 141 004

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2025/v151i11/170825

Keywords:

Dek, Growth parameters, Intercrops, Nutrient requirement, Productivity.

Abstract

Dek (Melia azedarach Linn.) is one of the fast growing tree species adopted by Punjab farmers in agroforestry systems. It is grown by farmers mainly on farm boundaries, but due to deciduous nature of plants, some farmers are also adopting block plantations of dek at a spacing of 5 x 4 m or 7 x 3 m along with agricultural crops. An experiment was conducted to standardize the nutrient requirement of dek plantation during 6 years of growth for getting its better productivity. The treatments consisted of nine combinations (T₂ to T₁₀) of N and P (as P₂ O₅ ) with intercrops in addition to control (T₁) of dek plants. The diameter at breast height (DBH), plant height and timber volume of dek plantation were lowest in control (T₁) (16.98 cm, 14.12 m and 89.1 m³/ha respectively) and the highest (19.78 cm, 15.78 m and 136.4 m³/ha, respectively) in T₇ after 6 years of growth. The fodder yield of pearl millet and grain yield of wheat decreased with increase in age of plantation. The average yield of pearl millet fodder was 362 q/ha during 1^st year which decreased to 268 q/ha in 3^rd year. Wheat yield was 46.2 q/ha during 1^st year which decreased to 20.6 q/ha during 6^th year. It is concluded that treatment T₇ was better than other treatments for getting higher productivity from dek plantation.

References

Albaugh T.J., Rubilar R., Fox T., Allen H.L., Urrego J.B., Zapata M. and Stape J. (2015). Response of Eucalyptus grandis in Colombia to mid-rotation fertilization is dependent on site and rate but not frequency of application. For. Ecol. Manage., 350: 30-39.

Boreham G. and Pallettt R. (2009). The influence of tree improvement and cultural practices on productivity of Eucalyptus plantations in temperate South Africa. Southern Forests, 71: 85-93.

Fang T., Young W., Luo J. and Gao Y. (2005). Long term fertilizer and water availability effect on cereal yield and soil chemical properties in North West China. J. Soil Sci. Soc. America, 69: 842-855.

Gill R.I.S., Dhakad A.K., Singh B. and Kaur N. (2025). Volume and biomass tables for farm-grown Malabar neem (Melia composita Benth.) for central plains of Punjab. Indian Forester, 151(6): 551-559.

Gill R.I.S., Singh B., Kaur N. and Luna R.K. (2007). Evaluation of crops in poplar plantation with three spacing in two row directions. Indian Forester, 133(2a): 45-57.

Henderson D.E. and Jose S. (2010). Biomass production potential of three short rotation woody crop species under varying nitrogen and water availability. Agrofor. Syst., 80: 259-273.

Kumari T.K., Sreenivasulu A., Meru E. and Rao P.S. (2002). Response of chemical fertilizers on Eucalyptus tereticornis clones. Indian For., 128: 502-508.

Majaura M., Böhm C. and Freese D. (2024). The Influence of trees on crop yields in temperate zone alley cropping systems: A review. Sustainability, 2024(16): 3301.

Manu R., Corre M.D., Majaliwa A.A., Mwanjalolo J.G., Babweteera F., Veldkamp E. and Straaten O.V. (2022). Responses of tree growth and biomass production to nutrient addition in a semi-deciduous tropical forest in Africa. Ecology, 103(6): e3659.

Newman S.M., Bennett K. and Wu Y. (1998). Performance of maize, beans and ginger as intercrops in Paulownia plantations in China. Agrofor Syst., 39: 23-30.

Panse V.G. and Sukhatme P.V. (1985). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. ICAR, New Delhi.

Saralch H.S., Singh B. and Chauhan S.K. (2007). Promising agroforestry practices in Punjab (In) Agroforestry Systems and Practices. pp 127-147. Puri S. and Panwar P. (Editors) New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi, India

Shukla J.K. and Kasera P.K. (2004). Response of irrigation and spacing levels on growth parameters of khejri (Prosopis cineraria). Indian J. For., 27: 335-338.

Singh B., Dhillon G.P.S., Gill R.I.S. and Kaur J. (2019). Biomass production of high density Leucaena leucocephala plantation under different levels of nutrients. Indian Forester, 145(1): 34-37.

Singh B., Gill R.I.S. and Kaur N. (2018). Effect of different levels of nutrients on growth and productivity of clonal eucalyptus. Indian J. Agrofor., 20: 73-76.

Singh B., Kaur N., Gill R.I.S. and Dagar J.C. (2016). Agroforestry for crop diversification and carbon sequestration. (In) Agroforestry Research Developments. Pp 99-146. Dagar J.C. and Tewari J.C. (Editors). Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York, 578 p.

Virk J., Gill R.I.S., Kaur N., Singh B. and Singh R. (2017). Evaluation of wheat varieties under Populus deltoides plantation at various tree spacing. Indian J Agrofor., 19(1): 57-62.

White P.J., George T.S., Hammond J.P. and James E.K. (2014). Improving crop mineral nutrition. Plant Soil, 384: 1-5.

Yin C., Pang X. and Chen K. (2009). The effects of water, nutrient availability and their interaction on the growth, morphology and physiology of two poplar species. Env. Exp. Botany, 67: 196-203.