Indigenous Wisdom to Ethical Innovation in Tribal Knowledge Protection, Medicinal Plant Quality Integrity, and Nagoya-Compliant Conservation Priorities

Indigenous Wisdom to Ethical Innovation in Tribal Knowledge Protection, Medicinal Plant Quality Integrity, and Nagoya-Compliant Conservation Priorities

Authors

  •   Praveen Chandra Dubey
  •   Mohammad Nadeem Khan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2026/v152i2/171085

Keywords:

Indigenous knowledge systems, Medicinal plant quality integrity, Nagoya Protocol compliance, Biocultural conservation, Ethical bioprospecting.

Abstract

Traditional medicinal knowledge (TMK) developed by indigenous and tribal communities embodies one of humanity's oldest and most ecologically grounded healthcare systems. This knowledge—rooted in ancestral wisdom, biodiversity stewardship, spiritual frameworks, and centuries of practical experimentation—continues to inform modern Ethnopharmacology and drug discovery. However, accelerating Bio-piracy, unsustainable bioprospecting, habitat destruction, climate instability, and weakening intergenerational knowledge transmission now threaten both TMK and the biodiversity on which it depends.Aligned with the CBD COP-16/4 (2024) decision on Article 8(j), this article presents a novel, three-pillar framework to protect traditional knowledge systems, ensure medicinal plant quality integrity, and implement Nagoya-compliant conservation strategies. It proposes a forward-looking roadmap integrating indigenous stewardship, modern scientific validation, ethical governance, and community-led conservation and propagation models. The approach not only preserves cultural identity but also strengthens national biodiversity strategies, sustainable livelihoods, and future drug discovery pipelines.

References

Balick M.J. and Cox P.A. (2020). Plants, People, and Culture: The Science of Ethnobotany. 2nd edn. Garland Science, New York.

Berkes F. (2018). Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management. 4th edn.Routledge, New York.

Botanical Survey of India (2022). Red List of Threatened Plants of India. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, Kolkata.

CBD Secretariat (2020). Global Biodiversity Outlook 5.Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal.

CBD Secretariat (2022). Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal.

CBD Secretariat (2024). Decision COP-16/4: Programme of Work on Article 8(j). Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal.

Convention on Biological Diversity (1992). Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi.

Cunningham A.B. (2001). Applied Ethnobotany: People, Wild Plant Use and Conservation. Earthscan Publications, London.

Fabricant D.S. and Farnsworth N.R. (2001). The value of plants used in traditional medicine for drug discovery. Environmental Health Perspectives, 109(Suppl.1): 69–75.

FAO (2011). Guide for the Preparation of Good Practices for Medicinal Plants. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

Gadgil M. and Vartak V.D. (1976). Sacred groves of India: A plea for continued conservation. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 72: 314–320.

Garnett S.T., Burgess N.D., Fa J.E., Fernández-Llamazares A., Molnár Z., Robinson C.J., Watson J.E.M., Zander K.K., Austin B., Brondizio E.S. and Collier N.F. (2018). A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation. Nature Sustainability, 1: 369–374.

Hamilton A.C. (2004). Medicinal plants, conservation and livelihoods. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13: 1477–1517.

Heywood V.H. (2019). Conserving plants within and beyond protected areas—still problematic and future uncertain. Plant Diversity, 41: 36–49.

Hill R., Grant C., George M., Robinson C.J., Jackson S. and Abel N. (2020). A typology of Indigenous engagement in Australian environmental management. Ecology and Society, 25(2): 1–15.

IPCC (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva.

Kala C.P. (2005). Indigenous uses, population density, and conservation of threatened medicinal plants in protected areas of the Indian Himalayas. Conservation Biology, 19: 368–378.

Kothari A., Pathak N., Bajpai R. and Vania F. (2013). Conservation and Justice: The Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. Kalpavriksh, Pune.

Laird S.A. and Wynberg R. (2023). Biodiversity governance and biocultural rights after Nagoya. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 19: 12–22.

Laird S.A., Wynberg R. and Rourke M. (2021). Rethink the expansion of access and benefit sharing. Science, 373(6559): 137–138.

Parrotta J.A. and Trosper R.L. (2012). Traditional Forest-Related Knowledge: Sustaining Communities, Ecosystems and Biocultural Diversity. Springer, Dordrecht.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Dubey, P. C., & Khan, M. N. (2026). Indigenous Wisdom to Ethical Innovation in Tribal Knowledge Protection, Medicinal Plant Quality Integrity, and Nagoya-Compliant Conservation Priorities. Indian Forester, 152(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2026/v152i2/171085
Loading...