Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Restoration of Degraded Ecosystems

Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Restoration of Degraded Ecosystems

Authors

  •   Harshita Negi   Graphic Era Hill University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India 248002
  •   Salil Tewari   G.B.P.U.A&T, Pantnagar, Udham Singh Nagar, India 263145

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2026/v152i6A/171304

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, Restoration, Degraded ecosystem, Degraded landscapes.

Abstract

Global forest ecosystems, which occupy about 4 billion hectares (or 30%) of the world's land mass, are the most visible indicators of the health of the Planet and act as critical carbon sinks, storing 66% of all terrestrial carbon. Yet, the world has lost 32% of forest cover due to industrialization and urban development, compounded by climate change effects such as severe weather events, changing drought patterns, and increasing wildfires. This paper presents the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) in rehabilitating these ecosystems. Through integration of the "scorpan" variables - soil, climate, organisms, relief, parent material, age, and space - AI models offer unprecedented predictive accuracy in predictions for species survival, growth and carbon storage. This paper explores key algorithms such as Random Forests (RF), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, as well as use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for targeted reforestation and decision-making. The results suggest that AI-based restoration efforts not only improve ecosystem resilience but are crucial to reaching global carbon neutrality, provided regional data gaps and domain shift issues are overcome.

References

Alif H.A., Mashrafi, Jisan Md., Elhag Md. and Purohit S. (2025). Artificial intelligence-driven rainfall forecasting and GIS-based flood risk mapping for climate-resilient infrastructure in Bangladesh, Earth Syst. Environ. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-025-00958-8

Allen C.D., Macalady A.K., Chenchouni H., et al. (2010). A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests, For. Ecol. Manag., 259(4): 660-684.

Ayadi R., Forouheshfar Y. and Moghadas O. (2025). Enhancing system resilience to climate change through artificial intelligence: a systematic literature review, Front. Clim., 7: 1585331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2025.1585331

Benavidez R., Bethanna J., Deborah M. and Kevin N. (2018). A review of the (Revised) Universal Soil Loss Equation ((R)USLE): with a view to increasing its global applicability and improving soil loss estimates, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22(11): 6059-6086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-6059-2018

Bibri S.E., Krogstie J., Kaboli A. and Alahi A. (2024). Smarter eco-cities and their leading-edge artificial intelligence of things solutions for environmental sustainability: a comprehensive systematic review, Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol., 19: 100330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2023.100330

Bovkir R. (2026). Linking vulnerability and resilience for climate change adaptation: a GeoAI-integrated assessment across Europe, Ecol. Process, 15(1): 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-026-00680-x

Breiman L. (2001). Random forests, Mach. Learn., 45(1): 5-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

Cai Y., Guan K., Peng B., Wang S., Seifert C., Wardlow B. et al. (2019). A high-resolution 2000-2016 crop-specific yield dataset for the United States, Agric. For. Meteorol., 274: 144-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.03.010

Chen T., He T., Benesty M., Khotilovich V., Tang Y. and Cho H. (2023). xgboost: Extreme Gradient Boosting. R package version 1.7.6.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=xgboost.

Craig A., Alison M., Haroun C., Dominique B., Nate McDowell, Michel V., Thomas K., Andreas R., David B., Hogg E.H., Patrick G., Rod F., Zhen Z., Jorge C., Natalia D., Lim Jong-Hwan, Gillian A., Steven R., Akkin S. and Neil C. (2010). A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 259: 660-684. 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001

Ding Z., Chen Z., Liu J., Evrendilek F., He Y. and Xie W. (2022). Co-combustion, life-cycle circularity, and artificial intelligencebased multi-objective optimization of two plastics and textile dyeing sludge, J. Hazard. Mater., 426: 128069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.128069

Englund O. (2017). A new high-resolution nationwide aboveground carbon map for Brazil. Geo Geogr. Environ, 4(2): e00045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.45

Essenfelder A.H., Toreti A. and Seguini L. (2025). Expert-driven explainable artificial intelligence models can detect multiple climate hazards relevant for agriculture. Commun. Earth Environ., 6: 207. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01987-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01987-3

Fan C., Zhang C., Yahja A. and Mostafavi A. (2019). Disaster city digital twin: a vision for integrating artificial and human intelligence for disaster management, Int. J. Inf. Manag. (Volume and pages not provided).

Fissore C., Dalzell B.J., Berhe A.A., Voegtle M., Evans M. and Wu A. (2017). Influence of topography on soil organic carbon dynamics in a Southern California grassland, Catena 149:140–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.09.016

Fontaine S., Barot S., Barré P., Bdioui N., Mary B. and Rumpel C. (2007). Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply. Nature, 450(7167): 277-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06275

Ghaith M., Yosri A. and El-Dakhakhni W. (2022). Synchronization-enhanced deep learning early flood risk predictions: the core of data-driven city digital twins for climate resilience planning, Water, 14(22): 3619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w14223619

Gomes L.C., Faria R.M., de Souza E., Veloso G.V., Schaefer C.E.G.R. and Filho E.I.F. (2019). Modelling and mapping soil organic carbon stocks in Brazil, Geoderma, 340: 337-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.01.007

Gunning D., Stefik M., Choi J., Miller T., Stumpf S. and Yang G.Z. (2019). XAI—explainable artificial intelligence, Sci. Robot., 4: eaay7120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aay7120

Henriksen H.J., Schneider R., Koch J., Ondracek M. Troldborg L, Seidenfaden I.K., Kragh S.J., Bogh E. and Stisen S. (2022). A new digital twin for climate change adaptation, water management, and disaster risk reduction (HIP digital twin), Water, 15(25). (Page/article number not provided). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010025

Ikegwu A.C., Emereonye G.I., Ebem D.U. and Uzuegbu V.C. (2026). A review of artificial intelligence expert systems for environmental surveillance and disaster management. Discov. Internet Things, 6: 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43926-026-00286-x

Jain P., Coogan S.C.P., Subramanian S.G., Crowley M., Taylor S. and Flannigan M.D. (2020). A review of machine learning applications in wildfire science and management, Environ. Rev., 28(4): 478-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2020-0019

Keles C., Baran B. and Alagoz B.B. (2026). Global temperature anomaly prediction by using additive twin LSTM networks. Sci Rep., 16: 6456. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37255-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37255-x

Khan N., Ray R.L., Sargani G.R., Ihtisham M., Khayyam M. and Ismail S. (2021). Current progress and future prospects of agriculture technology: gateway to sustainable agriculture, Sustainability, 13(9): 4883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094883

Kim B. and Kim T. (2025). AI in extreme weather events prediction and response: a systematic topic-model review (2015-2024), Front. Environ. Sci., 13: 1659344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1659344

Liang H., Zhang M. and Wang H. (2019). A neural network model for wildfire scale prediction using meteorological factors, IEEE Access, 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2957837

Litvinenko V.S. (2020). Digital economy as a factor in the technological development of the mineral sector, Nat. Resour. Res., 29(3): 1521–1541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09568-4

Liu H., Shu L., Liu X., Cheng P., Wang M. and Huang Y. (2025). Advancements in artificial intelligence applications for forest fire prediction, Forests, 16(5): 704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f16040704

McBratney A.B., Mendonça Santos M.L. and Minasny B. (2003). On digital soil mapping, Geoderma, 117(1-2): 3-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00223-4

Minasny B., McBratney A.B., Malone B.P. and Wheeler I. (2013). Digital mapping of soil carbon, Adv. Agron., 118: 1-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-405942-9.00001-3

Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G. and PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, PLoS Med., 6(7): e1000097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Mtengwana B., Dube T., Mudereri B.T. and Shoko C. (2021). Modeling the geographic spread and proliferation of invasive alien plants (IAPs), GISci. Remote Sens., 58(7): 1017-1037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2021.1903281

Ntinopoulos N., Sakellariou S., Christopoulou O. and Sfougaris A. (2023). Fusion of remotely-sensed fire-related indices for wildfire prediction through the contribution of artificial intelligence, Sustainability, 15(15): 11527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511527

Sakellariou S., Sfougaris A., Christopoulou O. and Tampekis S. (2023). Integrated wildfire risk assessment of natural and anthropogenic ecosystems based on simulation modeling and remotely sensed data fusion, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103129

Sakellariou S., Sfougaris A., Christopoulou O. and Tampekis S. (2023). Spatial resilience to wildfires through the optimal deployment of firefighting resources: impact of topography on initial attack effectiveness, Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci., 14: 98–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-023-00464-3

Sun W., Bocchini P. and Davison B.D. (2020). Applications of artificial intelligence for disaster management. Nat. Hazards, 103(3): 2631-2689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04124-3

Tewari S., Bhatt P., Negi H., Dubey A., Chavan S.B., Chichaghare A. and Kaushal R. (2022). Land use and biodiversity conservation through agroforestry. In Augmenting crop productivity in stress environment (pp. 367-390). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6361-1_21

Walker B., Holling C.S., Carpenter S.R. and Kinzig A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in socialecological systems, Ecol. Soc., 9(2): 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00650-090205

Wang J., Bretz M., Dewan M.A.A. and Delavar M.A. (2022). Machine learning in modelling land-use and land cover-change (LULCC): Current status, challenges and prospects. Science of the Total Environment, 822: 153559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153559

Wang T., Tong R., Xu T., Li Y. and Chen Y. (2026). Artificial intelligence in plant science: from image-based phenotyping to yield and trait prediction, Front. Plant Sci., 16: 1732979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1732979

Wu J., Wang X., Dang Y. and Lv Z. (2022). Digital twins and artificial intelligence in transportation infrastructure: classification, application, and future research directions, Comput. Electr. Eng., 101: 107983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.107983

You C., Wang Y., Tan X., Cui E., Zhang B., Bian C. et al. (2023). Inner Mongolia grasslands act as a weak regional carbon sink: A new estimation based on upscaling eddy covariance observations. Agric. and For. Meteorol., 342: 109719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109719

Yousefi Z., Alesheikh A.A., Lee S. and Rezaie F. (2025). An explainable geospatial artificial intelligence approach for spatiotemporal assessment of climate change effects on landslide susceptibility, Earth Syst. Environ. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-025-00949-9

Yuan Q., Shen H., Li T., Li Z., Li S., Jiang Y., Xu H., Weiwei T., Yang Q., Wang J., Gao J. and Zhang L. (2020). Deep learning in environmental remote sensing: achievements and challenges, Remote Sens. Environ., 241: 111716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111716

Zhou Y. and Liu J. (2024). Advances in emerging digital technologies for energy efficiency and energy integration in smart cities, Energy Build., 315: 114289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114289

Zhu J.-J., Jiang J., Yang M. and Ren Z.J. (2023). Machine learning in environmental research: common pitfalls and best practices, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57(36): 13271-13289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c00026

Zhu Q. Zhu Q., Fa Li, William J. Riley, Li Xu, Lei Zhao, Kunxiaojia Yuan, Huayi Wu, Jianya Gong, and James Randerson (2022). Building a machine learning surrogate model for wildfire activities within a global earth system model, Geosci. Model Dev., 15(5): 1899–1911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1899-2022

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Negi, H., & Tewari, S. (2026). Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Restoration of Degraded Ecosystems. Indian Forester, 152(6A), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2026/v152i6A/171304
Loading...