A Comparative Study of Different Carriers for Bioinoculant Preparation

A Comparative Study of Different Carriers for Bioinoculant Preparation

Authors

  •   Pallavi Bhatia   Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (Uttarakhand)
  •   N. S. K. Harsh   Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (Uttarakhand)
  •   R. C. Dubey   Department of Botany and Microbiology, Gurukula Kangri Vishwavidyalaya, Haridwar
  •   P. K. Kaushik   Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (Uttarakhand)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2017/v143i4/96720

Keywords:

Colony Forming Units, Inoculants, Shelf Life.

Abstract

Biological control is most applicable method for controlling plant diseases. The term applies the use of microbial antagonist to suppress disease as well as specific pathogen. For controlling the disease, biocontrol agent must be ecologically fit to survive, become well established and function within the particular conditions of the ecosystem. In general, organism introduced into an established system does not persist for a long time. The introducing agent must have an acceptable shelf life. Major considerations in developing a viable biocontrol product are the production, formulation and delivery of propagules that are viable and effective. Five solid carriers viz., groundnut shell, saw dust, bagasse, paddy straw and soil were used for the preparation of carrier based inoculums of Trichoderma and Rhizobium species screened previously against wilt disease pathogen Fusarium solani. Physical properties of the carriers were also measured which were found optimum for inoculum growth. Bagasse and saw dust was proved best among all the five carriers by maintaining high population density of inoculants among the year. Groundnut shell and paddy straw was considered as moderate carriers in comparison to bagasse and saw dust while soil was unable to maintain appropriate viable cells of the inoculants all over the year.

References

Connick W.J., Lewis J.A. and Quimby T.C. (1990). Formulations of biocontrol agents for use in plant pathology. In: New Directions Biocontrol (Eds. Baker, R. and Dunn, P.E.). pp. 345-372.

Kumar H. (2010). Plant growth promoting rhizobia in enhancement of productivity of medicinal legume Trigonella foenum-graecum L., Ph. D. thesis, Gurukula Kangri Vishwavidyalaya, Haridwar: 82pp.

Ojha B.M. (2000). Studies on biological control of root diseases caused by Fusarium species in some multipurpose tree species in forest nurseries, Ph.D. thesis, Guru Ghasi Das University, Bilaspur: 117 pp.

Saksena S.B. (1960). Effects of carbon disulfide fumigation on Trichoderma viride and other soil fungi, Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 43:111.

Smith R.S. (1992). Legume inoculant formulation and application. Canadian J. Microbiology, 38: 485-492.

Somasegaran P. and Hoben H.J. (1994). Handbook for rhizobia. In: Methods in legume Rhizobium technology, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg , New York, USA, pp. 217–218.

Trevors J.T., van Elsas J.D., Lee H. and van Overbeek L.S. (1992). Use of alginate and other carriers for encapsulation of microbial cells for use in soil. Microbiology Releases, 1: 61-69.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pallavi Bhatia, Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (Uttarakhand)

FOREST PATHOLOGY DIVISION

Published

2017-04-25

How to Cite

Bhatia, P., Harsh, N. S. K., Dubey, R. C., & Kaushik, P. K. (2017). A Comparative Study of Different Carriers for Bioinoculant Preparation. Indian Forester, 143(4), 350–354. https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2017/v143i4/96720

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 
Loading...