An Insight to the Plants of Sacred Groves Used for Toxicological Treatment in Ayurveda

An Insight to the Plants of Sacred Groves Used for Toxicological Treatment in Ayurveda

Authors

  •   R. Maya   Department of Post Graduate Studies and Research in Botany Sanatana Dharma College Alappuzha -688003
  •   V. N. Sanjai   Department of Post Graduate Studies and Research in Botany Sanatana Dharma College Alappuzha -688003

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2023/v149i11/169602

Keywords:

Sacred Groves, Vaidya, Lepa, Nasya, Anjana.

Abstract

Sacred groves are the miniature of forest derived on the basis of cultural faith. These virgin areas have been protected since ages by traditional societies and indigenous communities with their own experiences and followed a system of cultural worship. Such ecosystem approaches have worked under certain rules and myths goes to be at the origin of temple. And those sacred places have great vegetation without any significant disturbance and thereby exhibit unidentified relatives of cultivated plant species and threatened species have great medicinal value.

References

Ittoop Jacob Ancheril, Sharanesh T. and Deepthi V. (2016). Snake bite treatment in Prayoga Samuccayam. AncSci life.2016 Apr-Ju; 35(4): 245-248.

Kannan Chandra Sekhara Warrier (2004). Sacred Groves Conserved by an Ancestral Home in South Kerala- A Case Study. Conference: National workshop on strategy for conservation of Sacred Groves, at Coimbatore, India May 2004.

Kochunni Thampuran (1970). Prayoga Samuchayam Editor 1999 ISBN: SB22 1299-2000. Binding paper Back Thrissur Sulabha Books.

Leena Abraham (2013). From vaidyam to Kerala ayurveda The News letter No.65 Autmn 2013.

Peter Hobbins (2017). History: how the science of snake bite treatments has changed. University of Sydney Published February 6 2016.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2023-11-01

How to Cite

Maya, R., & Sanjai, V. N. (2023). An Insight to the Plants of Sacred Groves Used for Toxicological Treatment in Ayurveda. Indian Forester, 149(11), 1171–1175. https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2023/v149i11/169602
Loading...