An Empirical Analysis on Extent of Adoption of Drought Management Strategies in Different Vulnerable Districts of Tamil Nadu, India

An Empirical Analysis on Extent of Adoption of Drought Management Strategies in Different Vulnerable Districts of Tamil Nadu, India

Authors

  •   G. Balaganesh   Resource Survey and Forest Economics Discipline, Silviculture and Forest Management Division, ICFRE-Forest Research Institute, Dehradun-248 006 (Uttarakhand)
  •   Ravinder Malhotra   Principal Scientist (Retired), Division of Dairy Economics, Statistics and Management, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132 001 (Haryana)
  •   R. Sendhil   Department of Economics, School of Management, Pondicherry University (A Central University), Kalapet-605 014 (Puducherry)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2026/v152i6A/171264

Keywords:

Drought management strategies, Crop and dairy, Intensity of adoption.

Abstract

Adoption of drought management strategies becomes essential to reduce the adverse effects of drought. This study has developed a new extent (intensity) of adoption, using crop and dairy drought management strategies in different vulnerable districts of Tamil Nadu, India. Most of the studies have measured the intensity of adoption in either crop or dairy separately, but not combined. In addition, there is no appropriate measurement for extent of adoption. Hence, this study fulfils this research gap using gross intensity of adoption. There were 6, 7 and 5 paddy strategies identified in high (Ramanathapuram), moderate (Nagapattinam) and less vulnerable districts (Erode), respectively, whereas six dairy strategies were found in each district. The high-level and low-level adopters were significantly different in all the districts. The study found that paddy intensity of adoption was highest in Ramanathapuram (0.58), followed by Erode (0.47) due to more adoption of drought management strategies in crops. In contrast, the dairy intensity of adoption was highest in Erode (0.50), followed by Nagapattinam (0.46) because of more adoption of drought management strategies in dairy. The gross intensity of adoption was highest in Erode (0.52), followed by Ramanathapuram (0.51), whereas least was observed in Nagapattinam (0.44). This shows that households in Erode have more intensity to adopt the management strategies in comparison to the other two districts. This could be attributed to the prevailing drought condition in Ramanathapuram and combination of frequent occurrences of cyclones and prevailing drought situation in Nagapattinam. Adoption could be improved by reducing the adoption gap and increasing awareness through various programmes.

References

Ajaykumar R. and Krishnasamy S.M. (2018). Effect of PPFM and PGRs on crop growth rate in transplanted rice under moisture stress condition. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 7(4): 2366-2368.

Asfaw S., Shiferaw B., Simtowe F. and Haile M.B. (2011). Agricultural technology adoption, seed access constraints and commercialization in Ethiopia. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 3(9): 436-447.

Awotide B.A., Abdoulaye T., Alene A. and Manyong V.M. (2014). Assessing the extent of adoption and determinants of improved cassava varieties in South-Western Nigeria. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 6(9): 376-385.

Balaganesh G., Malhotra R. and Sendhil R. (2025). Development of household vulnerability index to climate change induced drought: empirical evidence from rural farm households in Tamil Nadu, India. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668‐025‐06095‐6

Balaganesh G., Malhotra R., Sendhil R., Sirohi S., Maiti S., Ponnusamy K. and Sharma A.K. (2020). Development of composite vulnerability index and district level mapping of climate change induced drought in Tamil Nadu, India. Ecological Indicators, 113: 106197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106197

Belsare V.P. and Pandey V. (2008). Management of heat stress in dairy cattle and buffaloes for optimum productivity. Journal of Agrometeorology, (Special issue - Part 2): 365-368.

Beshir H., Emana B., Kassa B. and Haji J. (2012). Determinants of chemical fertilizer technology adoption in north eastern highlands of Ethiopia: The double hurdle approach. Journal of Research in Economics and International Finance, 1(2): 39-49.

Darko E.O. (2015). Socio-economic determinants of intensity of adoption of cocoa research innovations in Ghana. International Journal of African and Asian Studies, 12: 29-40.

Fita L. and Trivedi M.M. (2012). Extent of adoption of improved dairy husbandry practices in Ada'a district of Oromia State, Ethiopia. Wudpecker Journal of Agricultural Research, 1(6): 203-207.

Ghimire R., Huang W.C. and Poudel M.P. (2015). Adoption intensity of agricultural technology: Empirical evidence from smallholder maize farmers in Nepal. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research, 4(1): 139-146.

Hafez E.M., Hassan W.H.A.E., Gaafar I.A. and Seleiman M.F. (2015). Effect of gypsum application and irrigation intervals on clay saline-sodic soil characterization, rice water use efficiency, growth, and yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, 7(12): 208219.

Holland J.M. (2004). The environmental consequences of adopting conservation tillage in Europe: Reviewing the evidence. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 103(1): 1-25.

IPCC, (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In working group II contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Fourth assessment report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

IPCC, (2013). Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis, contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, USA.

Latha A.K.V., Gopinath M. and Bhat A.R.S. (2012). Impact of climate change on rainfed agriculture in India: A case study of Dharwad. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 3(4): 368-371.

Magalhães A.R. (1996). Adapting to climate variations in developing regions: A planning framework. In: Smith, J.B., Bhatti, N., Menzhulin, G.V., Benioff, R., Campos, M., Jallow, B., Rijsberman, F., Budkyo, M.I., and Dixon, R.K. (Eds), From Adapting to climate change: An International perspective. Springer, New York, USA.

Mal P., Anik A.R., Bauer S. and Schmitz P.M. (2012). Bt cotton adoption: A double-hurdle approach for north Indian farmers. AgBioForum, 15(3): 294-302.

Moridi M., Rahimian M., Movahed R.G., Molavi H., Gholamrezai S. and Payamani K. (2025). Policy insights for drought adaptation: Farmers' behavior and sustainable agricultural development. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 100603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100603

Nchinda V.P., Ambe T.E., Nathalie H., Leke W., Che M.A., Nkwate S.P., Ngassam S.B. and Njualem D.K. (2010). Factors influencing the adoption intensity of improved yam (Dioscorea spp.) seed technology in the western highlands and high guinea savannah zones of Cameroon. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 36: 2389-2402.

NICRA, (2018). About NICRA. National innovations in climate resilient agriculture. ICAR, Government of India, Retrieved from: http://www.nicra‐icar.in/nicrarevised/index.php/home1

NIDM, (2012). India Disaster Report 2011. National Institute of Disaster Management, New Delhi.

Nkonya E., Schroeder T. and Norman D. (1997). Factors affecting the adoption of improved maize seeds and fertilizer in Northern Tanzania. American Agricultural Economics, 48(1): 112.

NRAA, (2013). Contingency and compensatory agriculture plans for droughts and floods in India- 2012, Position paper N o . 6 , N a t i o n a l R a i n f e d A r e a A u t h o r i t y, N A S C Complex, DPS Marg, New Delhi, India, pp. 87.

Paxton K.W., Mishra A.K., Chintawar S., Roberts R.K., Larson J.A., English B.C., Lambert D.M., Marra M.C., Larkin S.L., Reeves J.M. and Martin S.W. (2011). Intensity of precision agriculture technology adoption by cotton producers. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 40(1): 133-144.

Planning Commission, (2012). Final report of minor irrigation and watershed management for the twelfth five-year plan (2012–2017). Government of India, New Delhi, India, pp. 3–4.

Priscilla L., Chauhan A.K., Lalrinsangpuii, Balakrishnan A. and Gururaj M. (2017). Participation behaviour of dairy farmers in dairy co-operative societies in Manipur: A double hurdle approach. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(3): 420428.

Rajendran R. (2007). Lactation performance and milk constituents of Umblachery breed of cattle (Bos indicus) in its native coastal ecology of Tamil Nadu, India. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 19(5).

Roy T., Kumar S., Chand L., Kadam D.M., Bihari B., Shrimali S.S., Bishnoi R., Maurya U.K., Singh M., Muruganandam M., Singh L., Sharma S.K., Kumar R. and Mallik A. (2019). Impact of pusa hydrogel application on yield and productivity of rainfed wheat in North West Himalayan region. Current Science, 116(07): 1246-1251.

Sanjeevi P. and Mahandrakumar K. (2018). Technological mitigation strategies to overcome drought situations in Tamil Nadu. Journal of Extension Education, 30(2): 6088-6090.

Senthilkumar S., Prathaban S., Thanaseelaan V. and Manivannan C. (2015). Impact assessment of TANUVASmineral mixture on the production performance of dairy cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 50(5): 824-825.

Smit B. and Wandel J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3): 282292.

Subbiah G. and Vimalarani M. (2017). Azolla cultivation in generating income for farm women. Approaches in Poultry, Dairy & Veterinary Sciences, 1(5): 85-87.

Tambo J.A. and Abdoulaye T. (2012). Climate change and agricultural technology adoption: The case of drought tolerant maize in rural Nigeria. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 17(3): 277-292. TNAU Agritech Portal. Expert system for paddy. TNAU, Coimbatore, Retrieved from: http://www.agritech.tnau.ac.in/expert_system/paddy/Index.html

UNFCCC, (2009). Climate change: Impacts, vulnerabilities and adaptation in developing countries. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Retrieved from: www.unfccc.int/resource/docs/publications/impacts.pdf

Varadan R.J. and Kumar P. (2012). Impact of crop insurance on rice farming in Tamil Nadu. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 25(2): 291-298.

Varadan R.J. and Kumar P. (2015). Mapping agricultural vulnerability of Tamil Nadu, India to climate change: A dynamic approach to take forward the vulnerability assessment methodology. Climate Change, 129(1-2): 159-181.

Vijayasarathy K. (2013). Impact of climate variability on agriculture and the determinants of climate adaptation through agricultural technologies in the western zone of Tamil Nadu. Ph.D. (Thesis). Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.

Vijayasarathy K. and Ashok K.R. (2015). Climate adaptation in agriculture through technological option: Determinants and impact on efficiency of production. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 28(1): 103-116.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Balaganesh, G., Malhotra, R., & Sendhil, R. (2026). An Empirical Analysis on Extent of Adoption of Drought Management Strategies in Different Vulnerable Districts of Tamil Nadu, India. Indian Forester, 152(6A), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2026/v152i6A/171264
Loading...