Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access
Total views : 219

Relative Economics for Cultivating Salix alba Plantations for Carbon Trading under Temperate Conditions of Kashmir, India


  • Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Campus Wadoora, Sopore, India


This investigation was carried out during the years 2010-11 and 2011-12 in the willow plantations established by Plantation Division of State Forest Department in Anantnag, Bandipora, Baramulla and Ganderbal districts of Kashmir valley. The results revealed that willows can store up to 292.98 t C ha-1 and sequester around 1075.24 CO2 e tons ha-1. The NPV of future returns derived by discounting both costs and benefits at 12% rate of interest (with and without carbon benefits) are ` 7, 49,406 and 2,14,080 with a benefit cost ratio of 2.93 and 1.55 respectively for a productive rotation of 20 years. Thus enhancing carbon sequestration through commercial plantations of willow can prove to be a long term future policy option for sustained carbon sequestration programme in Jammu and Kashmir where willows alone comprise a total population of > 37 million trees with further scope for expansion as permanent marketable carbon sinks owing to the availability of about 15,082 Km2 of waste lands that could be used for plantation forestry. The profitability using profit function model indicates that carbon trading with willows in Kashmir is a viable option with net annual profit of ` 29,926 at a discounting factor of 12% and ` 30,654 ha-1 yr-1 at 10 %.


Carbon Credit, Carbon Sequestration, Economic Feasibility, Profitability Function, Salix alba.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 7)


  • Anon. (2005). Statistical Forest Digest Report. J & K Forest Department. Srinagar.
  • Bennick J., Holway A., Juers E. and Surp R. (2008). Willow Biomass: An assessment of the ecological and economic feasibility of growing willow biomass for colgate University.
  • Cacho O.J., Wise R.M. and Macdiken K.G. (2004). Carbon monitoring costs and their effects on incentives to sequester carbon through forestry. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 154: 273-293.
  • Dury S.J., Polglase P.J. and Vercose T. (2002). Greenhouse resource kit for private forest growers. Commonwealth Department of Agriculture and Forestry, Canberra, Australia. IV: 95.
  • Gera M., Mohan G., Bisht N.S. and Gera N. (2006). Carbon sequestration potential under agroforestry in Rupnagar district of Punjab. Indian Forester, 132(5): 543-555.
  • Gera N., Gera M. and Bisht N.S. (2011). Carbon sequestration potential of selected plantation interventions in Terai region of Uttarakhand. Indian Forester, 137(3): 273-289.
  • Gupta T. and Mohan D. (1982). Economics of tree versus annual crops on marginal agricultural lands, Oxford IBH publication Co. New Delhi. Pp 139.
  • Jianzhong H.U. (2006). Carbon storage of artificial forests in rehabilitated lands in the upper reaches of the yellow river. Front. For. China, 3:268-276.
  • Ljiljana K. (2011). Estimation of cost effectiveness of poplar wood production in poplar plantations in Ravni Srem based on the cost benefits method. Glasnik Sumarskog Fakulteta, 104: 81-90.
  • Masoodi T.H., Masoodi N.A., Islam M.A., Zaffer S.N. and Chauhan S.K. (2008). Basketry from introduced willows in Kashmir: Old tradition to new economically viable art. Indian Forester, 134(1): 77-87.
  • Negi J.D.S., Manhas R.K. and Chauhan P.S. (2003). Carbon allocation in different components of some tree species of India: a new approach for carbon estimation. Current Science, 85(11): 1528-1531.
  • Obersteiner M., Alexandrov G., Benitez P.P., McCallum I., Kraxner F., Riahi K., Rokityanskiy D. and Yamagata Y. (2006). Global supply of biomass for energy and carbon sequestration from afforestation/reforestation activities.Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for global Change. DOI:10.2007/s 11027-006-9031-z.
  • Samson R., Girovard P., Zan C., Mehdi B., Martin M and Henning J. (2001). Estimating the Carbon sequestration benefits in afforestation in
  • Ontario, Quebec and in the Atlantic provinces. Arbor Vitae Environmental services. Wood rising consulting.
  • Singh P.K., Das P.K. and Quli S.M.S. (2011). Economic analysis of agroforestry model adopted by tribal of Orissa: India. Indian Forester, 137(5): 535-543.
  • Taylor G. and Bunn S.M. (2008). Identifying biotechnological and biological research priorities for wood fuel. Short Rotation coppice and wood fuel symposium. Edinburgh Forestry Commission. 75-84 pp.
  • Wise R. and Cacho O. (1999). A bioeconomics analysis of soil carbon sequestration in agroforests (Working paper CCO ACIAR project ASEM).


  • There are currently no refbacks.