Performance and Economic Evaluation of Gamhar (Gmelina arborea Roxb.) and Aonla (Emblica officinalis Gaertn.) based Agroforestry Models in Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh

Performance and Economic Evaluation of Gamhar (Gmelina arborea Roxb.) and Aonla (Emblica officinalis Gaertn.) based Agroforestry Models in Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh

Authors

  •   Rambir Singh   Extension Division, ICFRE-Forest Research Institute, Dehradun-248006
  •   Anubha Srivastava   Forest Research Centre for Eco-Rehabilitation, 3/1, Lajpat Rai Road, New Katra, Prayagraj-211001
  •   Charan Singh   Extension Division, ICFRE-Forest Research Institute, Dehradun-248006

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2024/v150i1/170006

Keywords:

Agroforestry Models, Growth Performance, Intercropping, Economic and Degraded Land.

Abstract

Gamhar (Gmelina arborea Roxb.) and Aonla (Emblica officinalis Gaertn.) both are fast growing species and also short rotation suitable trees for fallow lands, which are capable to fulfill the timber, fuel wood, fruits and other demands of farmers in Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh states without making adverse effect on under- storey crops and showed a remarkable performance on fallow lands at Dhaluwala majbata (Haridwar) of Uttarakhand and Fatehpur Pelio (Saharanpur) and Kodapur (Prayagraj) of Uttar Pradesh. G. arborea and E. officinalis based agroforestry models were established in Randomized Block Design at 4 mx5 m and 5 mx5 m spacing along with seasonal agriculture rabi crops like Wheat-Barley-Mustard and kharif crops i.e. Groundnut-Til-Millet at above selected sites. On initial observations, soil at Kodapur (Prayagraj) site was alkaline with 8.25 pH in comparison of sites at Dhaluwala majbata (7.11 pH) and Fatehpur Pelio (7.36 pH). Available Phosphorus was in medium ranges at all sites. Available nitrogen and potassium were in low ranges at Dhaluwala majbata in comparison of sites at Fatehpur Pelio and Kodapur. It was also observed that the both species of G. arborea and E. officinalis are performing well on these fallow lands. The growth parameter of G. arborea and E. officinalis showed a regular increase both in height and girth along with agriculture crops at all sites. The expected B: C ratio and net profit in 8 years rotation were found maximum to be (3.29 and `19,15,320/ha) in model-1 (Gamhar-Groundnut-Wheat-Millet-Urd+til at 4x5 m spacing) followed by model-2 (Gamhar-Groundnut-Wheat-Millet-Urd+til at 5x5 m spacing) with (3.13 and `17,54,028/ha), model-7 (Gamhar-Barley-Dencha-Mustard-Cauliflower-Cabbage at 3m on Boundary) with (2.99 and `19,09,525/ha), model-5 (Gamhar+Aonla Mixed –Groundnut –Wheat –Millet -Urd+til at 4x5m spacing) with (2.60 and `13,46,788/ha), model-6 (Gamhar+Aonla Mixed –Groundnut –Wheat –Millet -Urd+til at 5x5 m spacing) with (2.47 and `13,15,317/ha), model-3 (Aonla-Groundnut-Wheat-Millet-Urd+til at 4x5 m spacing) with (1.94 and `7,84,992/ha) and model-4 (Aonla-Groundnut-Wheat-Millet-Urd+til at 5x5 m spacing) with (1.83 and `6,83,352/ha) respectively. As per net returns and B: C ratio, model-1 (Gamhar-Groundnut-Wheat-Millet-Urd+til at 4x5m spacing) was found more economic viable similarly also model-7 (Gamhar-Barley-Dencha-Mustard-Cauliflower-Cabbage at 3 m on boundary) to other models in expected 8 years rotation.

References

Chandler P. (1994). Adaptive ecology of traditionally derived agroforestry in china. Hum. ecol., 22: 415-442.

Dhillon W.S., Chauhan S.K., Jabeen N., Singh C. and Singh N. (2012). Growth performance of intercropping system components and nutrient status of soil under horti-silvicultural system. International Journal of Environment and Resource, 1(1): 31-38.

Gill A.S and Gupta S.K. (2007). Evaluation of trees for biomass production under agroforestry system in rainfed semi-arid subtropics. Indian J. Trop. Biodiv., 15(2): 155-159.

Giller K.E. (2001). Nitrogen fixation in tropical cropping systems. 2nd Edition, Cabi Series, CABI Publishing series, Wallingford, U.K, Pp. 222-250.

Himshikha (2016). Assessment of socioeconomic status of agroforestry farmers in Haridwar, Uttarakhand. International Journal of Farm Sciences, 6(4): 87-94, 2016.

Jackson M.L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Ltd., New Delhi.

Kumar R., Gupta P.K. and Gulati A. (2004). Viable agroforestry models and their economic inYamunanagar district of Haryana and Haridwar district of Uttarakhand. Indian Forester, 130 (2): 131-148.

Piper C.S. (1950). Soil and Plant Analysis. Adelaide University Press, Adelaide, Australia.

Puri S. and Nair P.K.R. (2004). Agroforestry research for development in India: 25 years of experience of a national programme. Agroforestry Systems, 61: 437-452.

Puri S. and Panwar P. (2007). Agroforestry Systems and Practices. New India Publishing Agency, Pritampura, New Delhi: P1-643.

Ram Newaj, Shukla S.K. and Yadav R.S. (1998-99). Varietal evaluation of aonla (Emblica officinalis) in agrisilvihorticultural system under rainfed conditions on marginal lands. Annual Report, NRCAF, Jhansi, pp.44-46.

Safa M.S. (2005). Socio-economic factors affecting the income of small scale agroforestry farms in Hill Country areas in Yemen: A comparison of OLS and WLS determinant. Small Scale Forest Econ., Manage and Policy, 4(1): 117-134.

Singh G., Singh N.T., Dagar J.C., Singh H. and Sharma V.P. (1997). An evaluation of agriculture, forestry and agroforestry practices in a moderately alkali soil in northwestern India. Agroforestry Systems, 37: 279-295.

Thakur P.K., Malik M.S., Singh B. K. and Oraon P.R. (2018). Assessment of socioeconomic status of agroforestry farmers in Giridih District, Jharkhand. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. SP1: 929-932.

Verma, P., Bijalwan A., Kumar S.A., Dobriyal M.J.R., Jacob V. and Kumar R.S. (2017). Scaling up an Indigenous Tree (Gmelina arborea) Based Agroforestry Systems in India. International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis. Vol. 3, No.6, 2017, pp. 73-77. doi: 10.11648/j.fem.20170306.11

Watson R.T., Noble I.R., Bolin B. Ravindranath N.H. Verardo J.D. and Dokken D.J. (2000). Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry. IPCC Special Report, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 388 pp.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2024-01-01

How to Cite

Singh, R., Srivastava, A., & Singh, C. (2024). Performance and Economic Evaluation of Gamhar (<i>Gmelina arborea</i> Roxb.) and Aonla (<i>Emblica officinalis</i> Gaertn.) based Agroforestry Models in Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh. Indian Forester, 150(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2024/v150i1/170006

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 
Loading...