Error Propagation in Forest Biomass Assessment

Error Propagation in Forest Biomass Assessment

Authors

  •   M. Sivaram   Southern Regional Station, National Dairy Research Institute, Bangalore (Karnataka)
  •   S. Sandeep   Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi
  •   H. Matieu   Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2016/v142i1/87177

Keywords:

Biomass, Error Propagation, Allometric Equation, Monte Carlo Analysis, Pseudo-Meta-Analysis and Bayesian Model.

Abstract

Forest biomass is the basis for the estimation of carbon storage and emission due to forestry sector. Though the total forest biomass includes aboveground and belowground biomass, this paper deals with the issues related to aboveground biomass. The total aboveground biomass is estimated through a number of variables measured across various components of trees using non-destructive methods. The techniques employed range from simple measuring tape to regression models to satellite imageries. The total error in biomass estimates is the sum of errors in the variables propagated in a hierarchical fashion. The knowledge of prediction errors helps to know the quality of biomass and subsequently bio-energy and carbon estimates. In this paper, various sources of error in biomass estimation, error quantification and error propagation are discussed. The sources of error include tree measurements, sampling strategy, choice of an allometric model and satellite imageries.In South Asia, the standard errors of co-efficient of biomass equations and R2 are often depicted as indicators for the quality of volumeand biomass equations. The Studies on error propagation in biomass estimates are scarce. Monte Carlo analysis, Pseudo-meta-analysis and Bayesian model averaging have been investigated to address the issues of error propagation in biomass estimation. Among these Bayesian model averaging appears to be a promising technique.

References

Ajith, Srivastava P.N., Gupta V.K. and SoIanki K.R. (1999). Tree growth modeling: Problem of negative and constant estimation size. Agro Forestry News Letter, 11(1): 4.

Brown S. (1997). Estimating biomass and biomass change of Tropical Forests: a Primer. FAO Forestry Paper – 134. FAO, Rome (also available at http:// www.fao.org/ docrep/ w4095e/w4095e00.HTM).

Case B.S and Hall R.J. (2008). Assessing prediction errors of generalized tree biomass and volume equations for the boreal forest region of west-central Canada, Can. J. For. Res., 38: 878-889.

Chave J., Condit R., Aguilar S., Hernandez A., Lao S. and Perez R. (2004). Error propagation and scaling for tropical forest biomass estimates, The Royal Society, 359: 409-420.

Chave J., Andalom C., Brown S.,Cairns M.A., Chambers J.Q., Eamus D., Folster H., Fromard F., Higuchi N., Kira T., Lescure J.P., Nelson B.W., Ogawa H., Puig H., Rie´ra B., and Yamakura, T. (2005). Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests, Oecologia, 145: 87–99.

Colgan M.S., Asner G.P. and Swemmer T. (2013). Harvesting tree biomass at the stand level to assess the accuracy of field and airborne biomass estimation in savannas, Ecological Applications, 23(5):1170–1184.

Gurdak J.J., Qi S.L., and Geisler M.L., (2009). Estimating prediction uncertainty from geographical information system raster processing—A user's manual for the Raster Error Propagation Tool (REPTool): U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, 11–C3, 71 p.

Hoeting, A., Madigan. D., Raftery, A.E. and Volinsky, C.T. (1999). Bayesian Model Averaging: A Tutorial, Statistical Science, 14 (4): 382–417.

Hunter M.O., Keller M., Victoria D. and Morton D.C. (2013).Tree height and tropical forest biomass estimation, Biogeosciences, 10: 8385–8399.

Jara M.C. and Henry M. (2013). Proceedings of the regional technical workshop on Tree Volume and Biomass Allometric Equations in South and Central America, 21-24 May 2013, UN-REDD MRV Report 12, Turrialba, Costa Rica.

Jayaraman K. (1999). A Statistical Manual for Forestry Research. Regional Office for Asia and Pacific, FAO, Bangkok. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/ fao/003/X6831E/X6831E00.pdf .

Larocquea G.R., Bhattib J.S., Boutina R. and Chertovc O. (2008). Uncertainty analysis in carbon cycle models of forest ecosystems: Research needs and development of a theoretical framework to estimate error propagation, Ecological Modelling, 219: 400–412.

Molto Q., Rossi V. and Blanc L. (2012). Error propagation in biomass estimation in tropical forests, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, British Ecological Society: 1-9.

Nguyet D.A. (2012). Error propagation in carbon estimation using the combination of Airborne LiDARr data and very high resolution Geo-eye satellite imagery in Ludhikhola Watershed, Gorkha, Nepal.

Pare D., Bernier P., Lafleur B., Titus B.D., Thiffault E., Maynard D.G., and Guo X. (2013). Estimating stand-scale biomass, nutrient contents, and associated uncertainties for tree species of Canadian forests, Can. J. For. Res., 43: 599–608.

Picard N., Saint-André L., and Henry M. (2012). Manual for building tree volume and biomass allometric equations: from field measurement to prediction. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, and Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, Montpellier, 215 pp.

Rizvi R.H. and Khare D. (2006). Prediction models for timber weight of Poulus deltoids planted on farmelands in Haryana. Indian J. of Agroforestry, 8(1): 77-85.

Rizvi R.H., Diwakar K. and Dhillon R.S. (2008). Statistical models for aboveground biomass of Populus deltoides planted in agroforestry in Haryana. Tropical Ecology, 49(1): 1-8.

Sandeep S., Sivaram M., Henry M., and Birigazzi L. (2014). Inventory of volume and biomass tree allometric equations for South Asia. KFRI, Peechi, India, Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. (database is also available at http://www.globallometree.org/database/)

Schade B., and Wiesenthal T. (2011). Biofuels: A model based assessment under uncertainty applying the Monte Carlo method. Journal of Policy Modeling, 33(1): 92-126.

Srivastava P.N. and Ajit (2002). Illogical estimation intricacies associated with tree growth modelling and their alternative solutions. In: Abstracts of fifth annual conference of the International Academy of Physical Sciences on Interdisciplinary trends in Physical Sciences†and symposia on “The Role of Information Technology and its Implications†held at Bundelkhand University, Jhansi during 7- 9 April, 2002. Pp 31-32.

Sukhdev P., Prabhua R., Kumara P., Bassic A., Patwa-Shaha W., Entersa T , Labbatea G. and Julie G. (2015). REDD+ and a Green Economy: Opportunities for a mutually supportive relationship. UN-REDD Programme Policy Brief 01.

Thomas T.P., Rugmini P. and Balagopalan M. (2013). Carbon storage potential of different age teak plantations in Kerala. KFRI Research Report No. 458. Kerala Forest Research Institute,Peechi.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propagation_of_uncertainty (accessed on 01 August 2014).

Wayson C., Johnson K., Cole J., and Ung C.H. (2013). Estimating uncertainty of allometric biomass equations using a pseudo-meta-analysis approach In: Proceedings of the regional technical workshop on Tree Volume and Biomass Allometric Equations in South and Central America (M.C. Jara, and M.Henry, Eds.), 21-24 May 2013, UN-REDD MRV Report 12, Turrialba, Costa Rica.

Williamson G.B. and Wiemann M.C. (2010). Measuring wood specific gravity...Correctly. Am J Bot., 97(3):519-24.

Wilson B.R.S.A. and Daff J.T. (2003). Australia's State of the Forests report. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Govt. of Australia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-01

How to Cite

Sivaram, M., Sandeep, S., & Matieu, H. (2016). Error Propagation in Forest Biomass Assessment. Indian Forester, 142(1), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2016/v142i1/87177

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Loading...