The Economic Role of Rugra in Tribal Livelihoods: A Study of Non-timber Forest Products in Jharkhand

The Economic Role of Rugra in Tribal Livelihoods: A Study of Non-timber Forest Products in Jharkhand

Authors

  •   Rahul Kumar   Govt. +2 High School, Pithoria Ranchi, Jharkhand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2026/v152i2/171044

Keywords:

Rugra mushroom; Non-timber forest products; Tribal livelihoods; Value chain; Women's empowerment; Jharkhand.

Abstract

This study investigates the economic significance of Rugra (Astraeus spp.), a seasonal wild mushroom, in sustaining tribal livelihoods in Jharkhand, India. Employing household surveys, value chain mapping, and case study evidence from Khunti district, the research demonstrates that Rugra contributes approximately one-fifth of annual household income, rising to nearly 40% among vulnerable families. Its availability during the agricultural lean season provides a vital cash buffer for food security, educational expenses and agricultural inputs. Women emerge as the principal collectors; however, value chain analysis reveals structural inequities, with intermediaries appropriating a disproportionate share of profits, leaving collectors with barely half of the consumer price. Statistical analysis confirms that Rugra's financial contribution is significantly higher than other minor income sources. Beyond its economic role, Rugra functions as a livelihood stabilizer, enhances women's agency, and contributes to Jharkhand's emerging green economy. Policy interventions such as formal recognition, value addition, storage innovations and cooperative marketing are recommended to unlock its full livelihood potential.

References

Belcher B. and Schreckenberg K. (2007). Commercialisation of non-timber forest products: A reality check. Development Policy Review, 25(3): 355–377.

Bose S., Sahu G. and Nayak P.K. (2016). Women, forest products, and livelihoods: A case study from Odisha. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 23(2): 245–263.

Boa E. (2004). Wild edible fungi: A global overview of their use and importance to people. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.

FAO. (2010). Non-wood forest products in Asia and the Pacific. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Marshall E., Schreckenberg K. and Newton A.C. (2006). Commercialization of non-timber forest products: Factors influencing success. UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre.

Pandey A.K., Tripathi Y.C. and Kumar A. (2016). Non-timber forest products for sustained livelihood: Challenges and strategies. Research Journal of Forestry, 10(1): 1–7.

Saha D. (2011). Market structure and price formation of nontimber forest products in Jharkhand. Economic & Political Weekly, 46(9): 67–74.

Shackleton C.M. and Pandey A.K. (2014). Positioning nontimber forest products on the development agenda. Forest Policy and Economics, 38: 1–7.

Sundriyal M. and Sundriyal R.C. (2003). Wild edible plants of the Himalayan region: Nutritive value and livelihood role. Economic Botany, 57(3): 286–299.

Vedeld P., Angelsen A., Bojö J., Sjaastad E. and Berg G.K. (2007). Forest environmental incomes and the rural poor. Forest Policy and Economics, 9(7): 869–879.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Kumar, R. (2026). The Economic Role of Rugra in Tribal Livelihoods: A Study of Non-timber Forest Products in Jharkhand. Indian Forester, 152(2), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2026/v152i2/171044

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Loading...