Evaluation of Toxicity of some Novel Molecules of Insecticides against Spodoptera litura (FAB.)

Evaluation of Toxicity of some Novel Molecules of Insecticides against Spodoptera litura (FAB.)

Authors

  •   Shiwani Bhatnagar   Forest Protection Division, Arid Forest Research Institute, New Pali Raod, Jodhpur, Rajasthan
  •   Arvind Kumar   Forest Protection Division, Institute of Forest Productivity, Ranchi
  •   A. K. Karnatak   Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, G. B. Pant Univ. of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar – 263145, U.S. Nagar, Uttarakhand
  •   Yogesh Kumar   Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, G. B. Pant Univ. of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar – 263145, U.S. Nagar, Uttarakhand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2013/v139i11/40620

Keywords:

Spodoptera litura, Novel Insecticides, LC50 Values, Dose Mortality Response

Abstract

An attempt was made to assess the toxicity of some novel molecules of insecticides against Spodoptera litura (Fab.). The dose mortality response to the 7 d old larvae of S. litura indicated that spinosad at 24 h was 4.773 times more toxic than cartap hydrochloride at LC50 value. By the lapse of time this ratio further increases to 82.5 at 48 h and 71 times at 72h. The relative toxicity ratio (RTR) of novel molecules at LC50 value in comparison to cartap hydrochloride at 24h and 48h were: spinosad (4.77, 9.9)> fipronil (1.59, 3) and at 72h the values were spinosad (10.14) and fipronil (2.54). LC50 values of cartap hydrochloride, fipronil, spinosad, as 0.44% and 0.126%; 0.0418% and 0.079%; 0.004% and 0.0264% respectively at 24 h.

References

Abbot, W.S. (1925). A method for computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol., 18: 265-267.

Anonymous (2000). ICPA Vision 2005. Technical bulletin of Indian Crop Protection Association, Mumbai, 20 pp.

Finney, J.C. (971). Probit analysis. Cambridge University Press, London, 333 pp.

Janakiraman, S. and Gupta, G.P. (2002). Effect of modified artificial diet and insecticidal proteins on growth and development of tobacco cutworm (Spodoptera litura). Indian Journal of Agricultural sciences, 72(12): 719-25.

Joia, B.S., Udeaaan, A.S. and Chawla, R.P. (1996). Toxicity of cartap hydrochloride and other insecticides to multi-resistant strains of the diamond back moth Plutella xylostella (L.) in the Punjab. Int. Pest Control, 38 (5): 158-159.

Kodandaram, M.H. and Dhingra, S. (2007). Variation in the toxicity of organophosphate insecticides to field population of Spodoptera litura. Indian Journal of Plant Protection, 35 (1) : 53-56.

Moulton, J.K., Pepper, D.A. and Dennehy, T.J. (2000). Beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua) resistance to spinosad. Pest Management Science, 55:842-848.

Sparks, T.C., Crouse, G.D. and Durst, G. (2001).Natural products as insecticides: the biology, biochemistry and quantitative structure-activity relationships of spinosyns and spinosoids. Pest management science, 57: 896-905.

Shankara Murthy, Thippaiah, M.M. and Kitturmmath, M.S. (2006). Effect of neem formulations on larvae of tobacco cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Fab.). Insect Environment, 12(2): 84-85.

Tandi, B.L. and Narayananan, K. (2002).Susceptibility of different larval instars of Spodoptera litura to its nuclear polyhydrosis virus. Indian J. Appl. Ent., 16(1): 40-43.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2013-11-20

How to Cite

Bhatnagar, S., Kumar, A., Karnatak, A. K., & Kumar, Y. (2013). Evaluation of Toxicity of some Novel Molecules of Insecticides against <I>Spodoptera litura</I> (FAB.). Indian Forester, 139(11), 1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2013/v139i11/40620

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 
Loading...