Ecological Status of Three Micro Watersheds in Western Himalaya

Ecological Status of Three Micro Watersheds in Western Himalaya

Authors

  •   T. V. Ramachandra   Energy and Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012
  •   N. V. Joshi   Energy and Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012
  •   G. R. Rao   Energy and Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012
  •   G. Dhanpal   Energy and Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012
  •   K. V. Gururaja   Energy and Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012
  •   Amit S. Yadav   Energy and Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2014/v140i4/48012

Keywords:

Biodiversity, Ecological Status, Floral And Faunal Diversity, Watershed, Altitudinal Gradients, Western Himalaya

Abstract

Ecological status of a particular region is determined by assessing its biodiversity, prevailing conditions of the environment and their interactions. Biodiversity assessments in micro watershed across altitudinal gradients of Western Himalaya reveal that phytodiversity includes a total of 2276 individuals from 75 woody species belonging to 38 families. Among the three micro watersheds, Mandhala was species rich with 43 species followed by Moolbari (39) and MeGad (9). In Mandhala most of the species are thorny shrubs and rarely attain tree forms due to severe anthropogenic disturbances, which also yielded very low basal area. Moolbari had the highest basal area, which had dominant species Quercus leucotricophora and Q. glauca. MeGad, a high altitude area was mostly dominated by Abies pindrow, Picea smithiana and Pinus wallichiana. Faunal investigations enumerated 115 butterfly species, 14 amphibian and 136 bird species. Butterflies in the region were oriental and palaearctic in origin representing nine families. Similarly, 14 species amphibians belonging to 5 families were sighted during the field investigations. Paa minica is vulnerable and Amolops chakrataensis is data deficient according to IUCN status and these two are endemics of Himalayan foot hills. Among the three watersheds, Mandhala, lying in Shivaliks has higher faunal diversity followed by Moolbari. Amphibians were not encountered in MeGad microwatershed during Aug-Sept 07. In total 136 bird species were recorded from three watersheds, the maximum number of bird species occurred in Mandhala region (104) followed by Moolbari (57) and Me Gad (35).

References

Adhikari, B.S. (1992). Biomass, productivity and nutrient cycling of kharsu-oak and silver-fir forest in Central Himalaya. Ph.D., Thesis, Kumaun University, Nainital, India.

Adhikari, B.S., Rawat, Y.S. and Singh, S.P. (1995). Structure and function of High altitude forest of Central Himalaya I. Dry Matter Dynamics. Ann. of Bot., 75: 237-248.

Ali, S. (1989). Book of Indian Birds, Second edition, Bombay Natural History Society publication, Mumbai.

Arora, G.S., Mehta, H.S. and Walia, V. (2005). Insecta: Lepidoptera (Butterflies). In: Fauna of Western Himalaya (Part-2)-Himachal Pradesh (ed. Director), Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, pp. 157-180.

Aswal, B.S. and Mehrotra, B.N. (1994). Flora of Lahaul-Spiti (A cold desert in North-West Himalaya). Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh. Dehradun.

Beebee, T.J.C. and Griffiths, R.A. (2005). The amphibian decline crisis: A watershed for conservation biology?, Biological Conservation, 125:271-285 doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.009

Blair, R.B. and Launer, A.E. (1997). Butterfly diversity and human land use: Species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biological Conservation, 80: 113–125.

Champion, H.G. and Seth, S.K. (1968).A Revised Survey of Forest Types of India. Manager of Publications, Government of India, Delhi.

Champion, H.G. (1921). The influence of hand of man on the distribution of forestin the Kumaun Himalaya. Indian Forester, 49(3).

Chowdhery, H.J. (1999). Himachal Pradesh In: Floristic diversity and Conservation strategies in India, Vol-2. (V.Mudgal, P.K. Hajra etd.).Botanical survey of India, Calcutta.

Erhardt, A. (1985). Diurnal Lepidoptera: Sensitive indicators of cultivated and abandoned grassland. Journal of Applied Ecology, 22:849–861.

Evans, W.H. (1932). The Identification of Indian Butterflies, 2nd ed., 454 pp., 32 pls. Bombay Natural History Society, Bombay.

Frost, D.R., Grant, T., Faivovich, J., Bain, R.H., Haas, A., Haddad, C.F.B., De Sá, R.A., Channing, A.,Wilkinson, M., Donnellan, S.C., Raxworthy,

C.J., Campbell, J.A., Blotto, B.L., Moler, P., Drewes, R.C., Nussbaum, R.A., Lynch, J.D., Green, D.M., Wheeler, W.C. (2006). The Amphibian Tree of Life. Bull Amer Mus Nat Hist, 297: 1–370.

Gaston, A.J., Garson, P.J. and Hunter, M.L. (1983). The status and conservation of forest wildlife in Himachal Pradesh, Western Himalayas,Biological Conservation, 29: 291-314

Grimmet, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. (1998). Birds of the Indian Subcontinent, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

Kim, K. C. (1993). Biodiversity, conservation, and inventory: Why insects matter, Biodiversity and Conservation, 2: 191–214.

Kremen, C. (1992). Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring, Ecological Applications, 2:203–217.

Laiolo, P. (2003). Diversity and structure of the bird community overwintering in the Himalayan subalpine zone: is conservation compatible with tourism?, Biological Conservation, 115: 251-262

Leps, J. and Spitzer, K. (1990). Ecological determinants of butterfly communities (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae) in the Tam Dao Mountains, Vietnam. Acta Entomologica Bohemoslovaca, 87: 182–194.

Lodhiyal, L.S. (1990). Structure and functioning of Popular plantation in Tarai belt of Kumaun Himalaya. Ph.D., Thesis, Kumaun University,Nainital.

Manel, S.P., Diasx, J.M., Buckton, S.T. and Ormerod, S.J. (1999). Alternative methods for predicting species distribution: an illustration with Himalayan river birds, Journal of Applied Ecology, 39:734-747

Mani, M.S. (1986). Butterflies of the Himalaya, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. New Delhi.

Mehta, H.S. (2005a). Fauna of Western Himalaya (Part 2) Himachal Pradesh, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata. pp

Mehta, H.S. (2005b). Amphibia. In: Fauna of Western Himalaya (Part 2) Himachal Pradesh, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata.

Molina, J.M. and Palma, J.M. (1996). Butterfly diversity and rarity within selected habitats of western Andalusia, Spain (Lepidoptera:Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea), Nota Lepidopterologica, 78: 267–280.

Murti, S.K. (2001). Flora of Cold Deserts of Western Himalaya:Vol-1, Botanical survey of India, Calcutta.

Negi, K.S. (1979). Species composition, biomass structure and nutrient relation of an oak forest. Ph.D, Thesis, Kumaun University, Nainital.

New, T.R. (1991). Butterfly Conservation. Oxford University Press, South Melbourne, Australia.

New, T.R., Pyle, R.M., Thomas, J.A., Thomas, C.D. and Hammond, P.C. (1995). Butterfly Conservation Management, Annual Review of Entomology, 40: 57–83.

Osmaston, A.E. (1923). Notes on Forest Communities of Garhwal Himalaya. J. Ecol., 10: 129-167.

Parmesan, C. (1996). Climate and species range, Nature, 382: 765–766.

Pollard, E. and Yates, T.J. (1993). Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation, Chapman and Hall, London.

Puri, G.S. (1960). Indian Forest Ecology. Vol. I, Oxford Book and Stationery Co., New Delhi.

Ralhan, P.K., Saxena, A.K. and Singh, J.S. (1982). Analysis of forest veggetation at and around Nainital in Kumaun Himalaya. Proc. Indian Nat.Sci. Acad., 48: 121-137

Ramachandra, T.V., Subash Chandran, M D., Gururaja, K. V. and Sreekantha, (2007). Cumulative Environmental Impact Assessment, Nova Science Publishers, New York.

Rana, J.C., Archana singh, Yogendra Sharma, K., Pradeep and Nisha Mendiratta, (2010). Diversity of plant bioresources in Western Himalayan region of India, Current Science, 98(2):192-203

Rawal, R.S. (1991). Woody vegetation analysis along an elevational gradient (1600-3400 m) of upper Sarju catchment, Kumaun Himalaya.Ph.D., Thesis, Kumaun University, Nainital.

Reddy, V.S. (1989). Analysis of soil and vegetation of landslides damage and undamaged sites in Kumaun Himalaya. A study on recovery of forest ecosystem. Ph.D., Thesis, Kumaun University, Nainital.

Rikhari, H.C. , Chandra, R. and Singh, S.P. (1989). Pattern of species distribution and community along a moisture gradient within an Oak zone of Kumaun Himalay. Proc. Indian Natn. Sci. Acad., 55: 876-880.

Samways, M.J. (1994). Insect Conservation Biology, Chapman and Hall, London.

Saxena, A.K. (1979). Ecology of completeof north western catchment of the river Gola. Ph.D., Thesis, Kumaun University, Nainital.

Saxena, A.K. and Singh, J.S. (1982a). A phytosocialogical analysis of woody species in forest communities of part of Kumaun Himalaya.Vegetatio, 50: 3-22.

Saxena, A.K. and Singh, J.S. (1982b). Quantitative profile structure of certain forest in the Kumaun Himalaya. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., 91: 529-549.

Schweinfurth, U. (1957). Die horizontale und. vertike verbreitung der vegetation in Himalaya. Bonner. Geogr. Abh., 20: 201-372

Scoble, M.J. (1992). The Lepidoptera: Form, Function and Diversity, Oxford University Press, New York.

Singh, J.S. and Singh, S.P. (1987). Forest Vegetation of the Himalaya. Bot. Rev. 53 (1): 80-192.

Singh, J.S. and Singh, S.P. (1984a). An integrated ecological study of eastern Kumaun Himalaya with emphasis on natural ecological resources. Vol. I. Studies with regional perspective. Final report (HCS/DST/187/76). Kumaun university, Nainital.

Singh, J.S. and Singh, S.P. (1984b). An integrated ecological study of eastern Kumaun Himalaya with emphasis on natural ecological resources. Vol. II. Site specific studies. Final report (HCS/DST/187/76). Kumaun university, Nainital.

Singh, J.S. and Singh, S.P. (1984c). An integrated ecological study of eastern Kumaun Himalaya with emphasis on natural resources. Vol. 3 syn. Thesis and summary. Final report (HCS/DST/187/76). Kumaum Univesity, Nainital.

Singh, S.K. and Rawat, G. S. (1999). Floral diversity and vegetation structure in Great Himalayan National Park, Wildlife Institute of India,Dehra Dun

Singh, S.P., Khana, R. K. and Singh, J.S. (1985). Accumulation in wood: A nutrient conservation strategy of tropical forest. Environ. Conserv., 12: 170-173.

Spitzer, K., Jaros, J., Havelka, J. and Leps, J. (1997). Effect of small-scale disturbance on butterfly communities of an Indochinese montane rainforest, Biological Conservation, 80: 9–15.

Stork, N.E., Srivastava, D.S., Watt, A.D. and Larsen, T.B. (2003). Butterfly diversity and silvicultural practice in lowland rainforests of Cameroon, Biodiversity and. Conservation, 12: 387–410.

Swengel, A.B. (1996). Effects of fire and hay management on abundance of prairie butterflies, Biological Conservation, 85(2): 73–85.

Tewari, J.C. (1982). Vegetational analysis along altitudinal gradients around Nainital. Ph.D., Thesis, Kumaun University, Nainital.

Thomas, C.D. and Malorie, H.C. (1985). Rarity, species richness, and conservation: Butterflies of the Atlas Mountains in Morocco, Biological Conservation, 33: 95–117.

Tiwari, J.C. and Singh J.S. (1985). Mapping forest Biomass in India through aerial photographs and non destructive field sampling. Appl.Geogr., 4: 151-165.

Tiwari, J.C. Rikhari, H.C. and Singh, S.P. (1989). Composition and structure feature of certain tree stands along an elevational gradient in Central Himalaya. Vegetatio, 85: 117-120.

Troup, R.S. (1921). Silviculture of Indian Trees. Vol. I - III. Clarendon Press, Oxfrod.

Upreti, N., Tewari, J.C. and Singh, S.P. (1985). The Oak forest of the Kumaun Himalaya (India): Composition, diversity and regeneration. Mountain Res. and Dev., 5(2): 163-174.

Wood, P.A. and Samways, M.J. (1992). Landscape element pattern and continuity of butterfly flight paths in an ecologically landscaped botanic garden, Natal, South Africa, Biological Conservation, 58: 149–166.

Wynter-Blyth, M.A. (1940-1946). A list of the butterflies of the Shimla hills, Journal of Bombay Natural History Society., 41: 716-741; 1945,45: 256-257: 1946, 46: 735-736.

Wynter-Blyth, M.A. (1957). Butterflies of the Indian Region, pp.523, 1-72 plates. Bombay Natural History Society, Bombay.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

How to Cite

Ramachandra, T. V., Joshi, N. V., Rao, G. R., Dhanpal, G., Gururaja, K. V., & Yadav, A. S. (2014). Ecological Status of Three Micro Watersheds in Western Himalaya. Indian Forester, 140(4), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2014/v140i4/48012

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Loading...