Identification of Suitable Perennial Host for Sandal in Nursery and Field

R. Anandalakshmi; A. Karthikeyan; K. Suresh Kumar; C. Rajesh; S. Geetha; E. Murugan; M. Ananthakumar

doi:10.36808/if/2023/v149i4/169618

Identification of Suitable Perennial Host for Sandal in Nursery and Field

Authors

R. Anandalakshmi Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Coimbatore
A. Karthikeyan Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Coimbatore
K. Suresh Kumar Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Coimbatore
C. Rajesh Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Coimbatore
S. Geetha Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Coimbatore
E. Murugan Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Coimbatore
M. Ananthakumar Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Coimbatore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2023/v149i4/169618

Keywords:

Santalum album, Haustoria, Hemi-Parasite, Trial Establishment, Sandalwood.

Abstract

Santalum album is a hemi-parasite tree species native to India. Its fragrant heartwood and oil are of high economic value across the globe. Restoration, domestication and cultivation of sandal is gaining importance in the recent times due to its dwindling populations. Raising sandal nursery and field establishment require scientific inputs to promote sandal rejuvenation especially to establish haustoria (nutritive organ). An experiment was conducted in order to identify suitable perennial host for sandal that can serve both as primary and secondary host. Among the ten different hosts tested, three species namely Pithecellobium dulce, Duranta repens and Casuarina junghuhniana were found to improve the growth of sandal in the nursery. These species recorded haustorial formation in the roots in the order of P. dulce (62.5%) >C. junghuhniana (45%) >D. repens (32.5%). Thus the shortlisted three suitable hosts were raised along with sandal in polybags for six months and field planted along with sandal. Sandal growth parameters such as height, collar diameter and crown circumference were recorded at intervals of 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 21 and 29 months. Results showed that P. dulce is the most appropriate host for sandal followed by D. repens, while C. junghuhniana suppressed the growth of sandal in field. It is therefore concluded that P. dulce can meet the primary host requirement for sandal in nursery and also used for successful sandal establishment in waste lands.

References

Anandalakshmi R., Murugan E., Rajesh C., Suresh Kumar K. and Geetha S. (2022). Efficacy of seed grading and priming on germination and seedling vigour of Sandal. Indian Forester, 148(2): 142-147.

Ananthapadmanabha H.S. (2000). Sandalwood and its marketing trend. My Forest, 36: 147-151.

Angadi, V.G., Kamal, B.S. and Rai, S.N. (1988). Effect of deficiency of trace elements on leaf area, chlorophyll level, and photosynthetic efficiency in tree seedlings. My Forest, 24(2): 124-128.

Arun Kumar A.N., Joshi G. and Mohan Ram H.Y. (2012). Sandalwood: history, uses, present status and the future Current Science, 103(12): 1408-1416.

Arunkumar A.N., Dhyani A. and Joshi G. (2019). Santalum album. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T31852A2807668. https ://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-1. RLTS.T31852A2807668.en.

Ceccon E., SaÂ´nchez I. and Powers J.S. (2015). Biological potential of four indigenous tree species from seasonally dry tropical forest for soil restoration. Agroforestry Systems. DOI 10.1007/s10457-014-9782-6, 89, 455-467.

Chaudhary L.B., Kushwaha A.K. and Bajpai O. (2016). Santalum album L. In: Trees of Uttar Pradesh (Part 1). Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd., Lucknow, India, pp. 296.

Dhanya B., SyamViswanath and Seema P. (2010). Sandal (Santalum album L.) conservation in southern India: Areview of policies and their impacts. Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 48(1â€“2): 1â€“10.

Fox J.E.D. and Doronilla A.I. (1993). Selection of primary host (pot stage) for Santalum album. Mulga Research Centre, School of Environmental Biology, Curtin University of Technology. Report to the Sandalwood Research Institute, 23p.

Gairola S., Aggarwal P.S. and Ravikumar G.S. (2008). Status of production and marketing of sandalwood (Santalum album L.). In: Proc. National Seminar on Conservation, Improvement, Cultivation and Management of Sandal. Gairola, S., Rathore, T.S., Joshi, G., Arun Kumar, A.N. and Aggarwal, P.K. (eds). Institute of Wood Science and Technology, Bangalore, pp 1â€“8.

Hari Shankar Lal, Sanjay Singh and Mishra P.K. (2014). Trees in Indian Mythology. Discovery, 12(29): 16-23

Mathur C.M. (1961). Artificial regeneration of Santalum album in Rajasthan. Indian Forester, 87(1): 37-39.

Nagarajaiah C. and Rao C.S. (1993). A successful method of establishing sandal tree seedlings. Current Research, 22(3-5): 51-52.

Orwa C., Mutua A., Kindt R., Jamnadass R. and Anthony S. (2009). Agroforestree Database:a tree reference and selection guide version 4.0 (http://www.worldagroforestry.org/sites/treedbs/treedatabases.asp)

Radomiljac A.M. and McComb J.A. (1998). Alternanthera nana R.Br. nursery sowing â€“ time influences Santalum album L. growth following field planting. In: Sandal and its products. Proceedings of an International seminar, held on 18-19 Dec. 1997, Bangalore, India. Edited by Radomiljac, A.M., Ananthapadmanabha, H.S., Welbourn, R.M. and K. Satyanarayana Rao, ACIAR proceedings, 84: 188- 191.

Rai S.N. (1990). Status and Cultivation of Sandalwood in India. Pp. 66-71. In: Hamilton, L. and Conrad, C.E. (eds.) Proceeding of the Symposium on Sandalwood in the Pacific. Honolulu, Hawaii, 9-11 April 1990. USDAForest Service Tech. Rep. PSW-122.

Rocha D., Ashokan P., Santhosh Kumar A.V., Anoop E.V. and Suresh Kumar P. (2014). Influence of host plant on the physiological attributes of field-grown sandal tree (Santalum album). Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 26: 166-172.

Sandeep C. and Manohara T.N. (2019). Sandalwood in India: Historical and cultural significance of Santalum album L. as a basis for its conservation. NeBIO, 10(4): 235-242.

Shinde S.R., Ghatge R.D. and Mehetre S.S. (1993). Comparative studies on the growth and development of sandalwood trees in association with different hosts. Indian Journal of Forestry, 16(2): 165-166.

Sinha R.L. (1961). Sandalwood in Bundelkhand Forest Division, Uttar Pradesh. Indian Forester, 87(10): 590-597.

Srikantaprasad D., Mallikarjunagowda A.P., Pushpa T.N., Thimmegowda M.N., Umesha K., Ravikumar R.L. and Prasanna K.T. (2022). Identification of suitable host for sandalwood cultivation in Northern dry zone of Karnataka. Industrial Crops and Products, 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114874.

Struthers R., Lamong B.B., Fox J.E.D., Wejesuriya S.R. and Crossland T. (1986). Mineral nutrition of sandalwood (Santalum spicatum). Journal of Experimental Biology, 37(182): 1274-1284

Tewari V.P., Sheetalkumari D. Naik, Sangamesh H. Veerapur and Chandrashekar N. (2014). Distribution, Growth & yield and Demand & Supply of Santalum album: Survey & Review. In: Conference: International Seminar on Sandalwood- Current Trends and Future Prospects, held at Institute of Wood Science and Technology, Bangalore on 26 - 28, 2014.

Uma Shaanker R., Ganeshaiah K.N. and Nageswara Rao M. (2000). Conservation of sandal genetic resource in India: problems and prospects. In: International conference on science and technology for managing plant genetic diversity in the 21^st Century, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Venkatesan K.R., Srimathi R.A. and Kulkarni H.D. (1995). Survey population. In: Srimathi, R.A., Kulkarni, H.D. and Venkatesan, K.R. (eds.) Recent Advance in Research and Management of Sandal (Santalum album L) in India. Associated Publishing Company, New Delhi, pp. 3-52.

Warrier R.R. (2010). Santalum album L. In: Krishnakumar, N., Palanisamy, K., Hegde, M., Warrier, K.C.S. and Krishnamoorthy, M. (eds.) Manual of economically important forestry species in South India, IFGTB publication, Coimbatore.pp.387-393.